Geri Dön

Self and other in the Renaissance: Laonikos Chalkokondyles and late Byzantine intellectuals

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401623
  2. Yazar: ASLIHAN AKIŞIK
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. CEMAL KAFADAR, PROF. PAUL MAGDALINO
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Siyasal Bilimler, Tarih, Political Science, History
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2013
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Harvard University
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 340

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The capture of Constantinople by the Ottoman armies of Mehmed II in 1453 was a cataclysmic event that reverberated throughout Renaissance Europe. This event intensified the exodus of Byzantines to Italy and beyond and they brought along with them the heritage of Greek antiquity. Laonikos Chalkokondyles contributed to the Renaissance with his detailed application of Herodotos to the fifteenth century, Apodeixis Historion, and made sense of the rise of the Ottomans with the lens of ancient history. The Apodeixis was printed in Latin, French, and Greek and was widely successful. The historian restored Herodotean categories of ethnicity, political rule, language, and geography to make sense of contemporary events and peoples. This was a thorough study of ancient historiography and Laonikos thus parted ways with previous Byzantine historians. I refer to Laonikos' method as“revolutionary classicizing”, to describe the ways in which he abandoned the ideal of lawful imperium and restored the model of oriental tyranny when he described the nascent Ottoman state. What appears to be emulation of the ancient classics was radical revival of political concepts such as city-states as ethnic units, freedom defined as independence from foreign rule, law-giving as fundamental aspect of Hellenic tradition which did not encompass the Christian period. Laonikos has often been studied in the context of proto-nationalist historiography as he had composed a universal history, wherein he had related extensive information on various ethnic and political units in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. However, such proto-nationalist application does not fully capture Laonikos' classicizing interests. Laonikos referred to his contemporaries as Hellenes, not because he was a nationalist who defined political identity only by recourse to language and common history. Rather, Laonikos believed that Hellenic identity, both referring to paganism as well as ethnicity, was relevant and not bankrupt. Importantly, we introduce manuscripts that have not yet been utilized to argue that Hellenism as paganism was living reality for Laonikos, his Platonist teacher Plethon, and their circle of intellectuals in the fifteenth century.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Çağdaş sanatta birey ve öteki bağlamında mahremiyet olgusu

    The concept of privacy in contemporary art in the context of 'The individual and the other'

    EZGİ ARARAT CÜCEOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Güzel SanatlarYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi

    Sanat ve Tasarım Ana Sanat Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MUAMMER BOZKURT

  2. Levinas'ta Öteki'nin özgürlüğü

    Freedom of the other in Levinas

    PINAR KARADAL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    FelsefeSüleyman Demirel Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MEVLÜT ALBAYRAK

  3. 'Öteki' kavramı üzerine görsel çözümlemeler

    Visual analysis on the notion of 'the other'

    EVRİM ÖZESKİCİ

    Sanatta Yeterlik

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2017

    Güzel SanatlarHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Resim Ana Sanat Dalı

    PROF. CEBRAİL ÖTGÜN

  4. Bir anlatım unsuru olarak 'parçalanma' ve 1970 sonrası Türk romanına yansıma biçimleri

    'Fragmentation' as a narration element and its reflections on Turkish novel after 1970's

    EMEL ARAS

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    Karşılaştırmalı EdebiyatDüzce Üniversitesi

    Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. RECAİ ÖZCAN

  5. Klasik uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerinde uluslararası sistemin doğası sorunu: Realizm, liberalizm ve marksizm

    The problem of nature of international system in classical international relations theories: Realism, liberalism and marxism

    MUHAMMED ALİ AĞCAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2003

    Siyasal BilimlerYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. FUAT AKSU