Geri Dön

A Conversation analytical account of responding in a second language

İkinci dilde cevap verme stratejilerinin söylem çözümlemesi açısından açıklanması

  1. Tez No: 127964
  2. Yazar: HATİCE GÜRBÜZ
  3. Danışmanlar: YRD. DOÇ. DR. İSMET ÖZTÜRK
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı, English Linguistics and Literature
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: pragmatics, speech acts, preference organization, responding to offers, responding to assessments, preferred responses, dispreferred responses. in
  7. Yıl: 2003
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Uludağ Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: İngiliz Dili Eğitimi Bilim Dalı
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 110

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACT The present cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the responding strategies of the Turkish EFL learners in responding to offers and assessments in a conversation analytical perspective with respect to their proficiency and, the ability of using their receptive and productive pragmatic knowledge. The subjects were 28 university students. An intermediate level homogenous group of the subjects were chosen for the study and to determine the level of proficiency a cloze test was administered to the subjects. Data were collected by the use of two discourse completion tasks (The Production Tests) and a multiple choice questionnaire (The Perception Tests) in English seperately designed for both offers and assessments. By the use of these tests, the subjects' differentiation between the realisation of the preferred and dispreferred responses in responding to offers and assessments according to preference organization system in English and the difference between the subjects' ability of using their productive and receptive pragmatic knowledge in their responding strategies when responding to offers and assessments were explored. The present study aims to find out whether there is a relationship between the learners' language proficiency and pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers and assessments. The results indicate that there is not a significant relationship between the learners' language proficiency and pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers and assessments. With respect to the learners' differentiation between the preferred and dispreferred responses, the results reveal that Turkish EFL learners do not appear to differentiate between the realisation of the preferred and dispreferred responses in responding to offers neither in the production nor in the perception test. The learners do not seem to have a native-like pragmatic comptetence in responding to offers in the preferred and dispreferred format neither in the production nor in the perception test. On the other hand, the learners seem to differentiate between the realisation of the preferred and dispreferred responses in responding to assessments both in the production and perception test. The learners seem to achieve more successful pragmatic competence in responding to assessments in the preferred format rather than the dispreferred format. However, the learners' overuse of one or two types of prefabricated forms which are not frequently occur among the native speakers of English and not suitable for all social or cultural conditions do not reflect a native-like pragmatic competence in responding to assessment in the preferred format. Also, no significant difference was observed between the learners' ability of using their productive and receptive pragmatic knowledge in their use or selection of the responding strategies in responding to offers in the dispreferred format, and in responding to assessments both in the preferred and dispreferred format. However, there is a significant difference between the learners' ability to use their productive and receptive pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers in the preferred format. The results suggest that the learners' ability of using their receptive pragmatic knowledge seems to be better than the ability of using their productive pragmatic knowledge in responding to offers in the preferred format. Possible reasons for these results are the“text-book effect”,“overgeneralisation”, and“pragmatic transfer caused by the Turkish language and culture”.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Günümüz Türkiyesi'nde muhafazakarlık kavramının Hürriyet ve Yeni Şafak gazeteleri bağlamında içerik analizi yöntemiyle analizi

    Analyzing the conservatism in modern Turkey with the examination of newspaper Hürriyet and Yeni Şafak by discourse analysis

    İSMAİL CEM FERİDUNOĞLU

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2013

    GazetecilikMarmara Üniversitesi

    Gazetecilik Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SEMRA ATILGAN

  2. Yalıtım malzemelerinin mikroyapılarının ısı geçişine etkisi

    Effect of microstructure of fibrous insulation materials on heat transfer

    ORKUN DOĞU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2015

    Makine Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Makine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SEYHAN ONBAŞIOĞLU

  3. Çok ölçütlü sorun çözümüne yönelik bir bütünleşik karar destek modeli

    Integrated decision aid model for multiattribute problem solving

    YUSUF İLKER TOPÇU

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2000

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF. DR. FÜSUN ÜLENGİN

  4. Çelik tel halatı mukavemetinin deniz ortamındaki değişikliklerinin incelenmesi

    An investigation for the changes of steel wire rope strenght in the marine environment

    İSMAİL KANDEMİR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2014

    Deniz Bilimleriİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Deniz Ulaştırma İşletme Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. MÜNİP BAŞ

  5. Wıttgensteın'ın din anlayışı

    Wittgenstein's understanding of religion

    İSMAİL HAKKI KUMBASAR

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Felsefeİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. CENGİZ ÇAKMAK