Geri Dön

Word syntax of nominal compounds: Internal and aphasiological evidence from Turkish

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

PDF İndir

  1. Tez No: 401065
  2. Yazar: DENİZ TAT
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. SIMIN KARIMI, DR. HEIDI HARLEY
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Dilbilim, Linguistics
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2013
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: The University of Arizona
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 219

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This dissertation is an analysis of two types of nominal compounds in Turkish, primary compounds and synthetic compounds within the framework of Distributed Morphology. A nominal primary compound is formed by two nouns, and its meaning is largely determined by world knowledge. A synthetic compound, on the other hand, is formed by a noun and a derverbal noun, such that the former is a true argument of the latter. The meaning of such compounds is always compositional. In many languages, the structural difference between these two types of compounds is not immediately observable. However, in Turkish, a primary compound would be obligatorily marked with the compound marker, -(s)!(n) while a synthetic compound would never be marked as such. In this dissertation, I claim that primary compounds in Turkish are underlyingly possessive phrases, a claim that has been previously made by several others. My analysis differs from those previous analyses in that it maintains that -(s)!(n) figures in a morphological component that follows syntax but precedes PF. Such a post-syntactic analysis has a number of advantages as it can account for a wide range of descriptive observations about the behavior of -(s)!(n). I claim that -(s)!(n) and an agreement marker never form a sequence at any stage in the grammar. I test this claim in an experiment conducted with Turkish-speaking individuals with aphasia, and show that only a vanishingly rare number of -(s)!(n)-agreement sequences are attested in aphasic speech. My analysis of synthetic compounds in Turkish is based on three types of nominalizers and the types of categories they can select. I show that only event-denoting nominals can form true synthetic compounds. I also show that nominals that are derived directly from roots can never form true synthetic compounds, which casts doubts on roots as projecting categories. I also consider a third group of seemingly synthetic compounds, which have an overt complex verbal stem, and yet, fail to derive true synthetic compounds. Following Marantz (2013), I claim that such pseudo-synthetic compounds, in fact, have semantically null verbalizing morphemes, and therefore, the root and the nominalizing head are semantically adjacent at LF.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    723186

    İbnü's-Serrâc'a göre Arapça sözdiziminde takdim ve tehir (El-Usûl örneği)

    Fronting and delaying in Arabic syntax according to Ibn Sarrāj(The example of al-Usul)

    NEŞE ÇETİNOVALI BAY

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    Dilbilimİzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ EYUP AKŞİT

  2. Tez No

    547740

    Tarihî Türk dillerinde sözdizimsel değişimler: Sıfat işlevli yantümceler

    Syntactic changes in historical Turkic languages: Relative clauses

    HÜLYA UYSAL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    DilbilimAnkara Üniversitesi

    Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. PAŞA YAVUZARSLAN

  3. Tez No

    249076

    İlköğretim Türkçe 8. sınıf ders kitabı'ndaki metinler üzerinde cümle çeşitlerinin incelenmesi ve cümle çeşitlerinin Türkçe öğretimi açısından değerlendirilmesi

    The examination of sentence types in the reading passages in Turkish book for 8th grades and the evaluation of sentence types in terms of teaching Turkish language

    Z.ŞULE YİĞİT

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    Türk Dili ve EdebiyatıNiğde Üniversitesi

    Türk Edebiyatı Bölümü

    DOÇ. DR. MEVLÜT GÜLTEKİN

  4. Tez No

    490931

    Nomînal morfolojiya kurmanciya herêma torê

    Tori kurmanci kürtçesinde adsıl biçimbilim

    AHMET GÜNERİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Kürtçe

    Kürtçe

    2018

    Doğu Dilleri ve EdebiyatıMardin Artuklu Üniversitesi

    Kürt Dili ve Kültürü Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. RAFIK DR SULAIMAN

  5. Tez No

    508892

    Ya'kûb Afvî ve tefsir anlayışı: Netîcetü't-Tefâsîr Fî Sûreti Yûsuf bağlamında

    Ya'gub Afwi and the concept of tafsir: In the context of Neticet Al-Tafasir Surati Yusuf

    EMİNE ARABACI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2018

    DinKarabük Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ŞÜKRÜ MADEN

Geri Dön