Geri Dön

Wittgenstein, the self and religious life

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401157
  2. Yazar: CHRYSSI SIDIROPOULOU
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. DAVID COCKBURN
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1995
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Unıversıty Of Wales
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This work is an attempt to discuss Wittgenstein's philosophy in a way which brings -together issues in Philosophy of Mind and in Philosophy of Religion. The ultimate aim is to show that the Cartesian dualistic picture of the self, not only is not necessary to religion, but that it, furthermore, gravely distorts philosophical accounts of religious life. In order to do this, the Cartesian idea of thought and language as mental occurrences is discussed and shown to give rise to the central dualist conception of a private inner self. Then an attempt is made to highlight the applications of such a conception to religious life. Saint Anselm's Ontological Argument for the Existence of God as well as Sir J.Frazer's Golden Bough are offered as examples of a mentalist view at work in much Philosophy of Religion. Following this, Wittgenstein's distinction between picture and representation is presented. It is suggested that this distinction can be useful towards shaping an anti- Cartesian, anti-mentalist framework within which to discuss important issues in Philosophy of Religion. One of the issues approached within such a perspective is that of prayer and superstition. Again, the claim is that Cartesianism cannot uphold the religious authenticity of prayer and that it fails to discern the distinctive grammar of superstition. Finally the concept of the soul is discussed. A brief historical exploration shows that this concept has been overwhelmed by dualist metaphysics, most clearly articulated by Descartes. It is then argued that the dualistic conception of the soul cannot do justice to any of the claims that the soul represents, notably among them those of spirituality and eternal life.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Words pictured, pictured read: Imagination, literary language and visuality in wittgenstein, heidegger and sartre

    Resmi yapılan kelimeler, okunan resimler: Wittgenstein, Heidegger ve Sartre'da hayalgücü, edebi dil ve görsellik

    MUSTAFA AHMET SÜNER

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2006

    Karşılaştırmalı EdebiyatUnıversıty Of Southern Calıfornıa

    Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. PETER STARR

  2. Kartezyen benliğe bir cevap olarak Wittgenstein`in ikinci dönem felsefesi

    The Later philosophy of Wittgentein as a response to cartesian ego

    TOLGA GÜNGÖR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2004

    FelsefeAnkara Üniversitesi

    Sistematik Felsefe ve Mantık Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ERDAL CENGİZ

  3. Posthümanist öznellik anlayışının dil ve anlam meselesindeki yankısı

    The echo of posthumanist understanding of subjectivity on the issue of language and meaning

    ARİF VOLKAN AYDIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    FelsefeHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NAZİLE KALAYCI

  4. Ethica ve Tractatus'ta Sub-Specie Aeternitatis ve Dünya

    World and Sub-Specie Aeternitatis in Ethica and Tractatus

    İBRAHİM KÖRPE

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2018

    FelsefeNecmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ERDAL BAYKAN

  5. Scepticism and 'Attitude': A wittgensteinian approach

    Şüphecilik ve 'Tavır': Wittgensteinci bir yaklaşım

    NESİBE SENA ARSLAN

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2022

    FelsefeBoğaziçi Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. CHRYSSI SIDIROPOULOU