Geri Dön

The impact of the item types and number of solution steps of multiple-choice items on item difficulty and discrimination and test reliability

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401309
  2. Yazar: ERKAN HASAN ATALMIŞ
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. NEAL KINGSTON
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Eğitim ve Öğretim, Education and Training
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2014
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Kansas
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 98

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This study examined two multiple choice item-writing guidelines addressed by Haladyna, Downing, and Rodriguez (2002). One is related to using the“None of the Above (NOTA)”option, the other is about the plausible number of options for a multiple-choice item (MCI). These two guidelines were empirically tested using one-step and multi-step problems to identify their impact on item characteristics (item difficulty and item discrimination) and test characteristics (test reliability). Three forms with MCIs were generated and administered to approximately 1500 7th and 8th grade students in the United States and Turkey. Bi-factor Item Response Theory (IRT) was applied to assess dimensionality related to the number of solution steps of items. Multiple regression models were employed to determine the degree of impact these item-writing guidelines had on item and test characteristics for MCIs with one step solution (MCI with one-step solution)and those with more than one step solutions (MCIs with multi-step solution). The results show that item characteristics do not change significantly across the conventional MCIs with four options, MCIs with three options, and MCIs with NOTA option. The interaction between solution steps and the three MCI types hadnosignificant impact on item characteristics. For the test with MCIs with a one-step solution, the findings demonstrate that four options are significantly more reliable than the NOTA options and not statistically different from three options. For the test with MCIs with multi-step solutions, four options are not statistically different from three and NOTA options. Compared to MCIs with four options,the results support that MCIs with NOTA options are preferable for MCIs with multi-step solutions while three options are desirable for both MCIs with one-step solutions and multi-step solutions.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Gemilerde artık ısı sistemlerinin optimum işletilmesi

    Optimum operation of waste heat recovery systems

    ERDAL GÜLLÜ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Gemi Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Gemi İnşaat Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. OSMAN KAMİL SAĞ

  2. Dağıtım merkezlerinde sipariş toplama ve ayrıştırma işlemleri için bütünleşik bir analitik model önerisi

    A proposed integrated analytical model for order picking and sortation operations in warehouses

    RECEP KIZILASLAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2014

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    İşletme Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. DEMET BAYRAKTAR

  3. Techno-economic investigation of alternative propulsion systems for tugboats

    Römorkörler için alternatif sevk sistemlerinin tekno-ekonomik incelenmesi

    ÖMER EMRE KARAÇAY

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    Gemi Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Gemi İnşaatı ve Gemi Makineleri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. OSMAN AZMİ ÖZSOYSAL

  4. Üretim planlama ve kontrol

    The Production planning and control

    HÜLYA AKIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1993

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    DOÇ.DR. MEHMET TANYAŞ

  5. Kıyı yapısı inşaatları için iş güvenliği risk yönetim sistemi

    Occupational safety risk management system for coastal structure construction

    DİNÇER İNANÇ YILMAZ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Mühendislik Bilimleriİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    İnşaat Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. DENİZ ARTAN