Byzantine heritage, archaeology, and politics between Russia and the Ottoman Empire: Russian Archaeological Institute in Constantinople (1894-1914)
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 401676
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DOMINIC LIEVEN
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Tarih, History
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2014
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of London - London School of Economics and Political Science
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Tarih Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 285
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This dissertation will analyse the history of the Russian Archaeological Institute in Constantinople, which operated between 1895 and 1914. Established under the administrative structure of the Russian Embassy in Constantinople, the institute occupied a place at the intersection of science and politics. Focusing nearly exclusively on Byzantine and Slavic antiquities in the Ottoman Empire, the activities of the institute reflected the imperial identity of Russia at the turn of the century. As was explicitly expressed by Russian diplomats, bureaucrats, and scholars, the establishment of an archaeological institution in the Ottoman capital was regarded as a foreign policy tool to extend Russia's influence in the Near East, a tool of“soft power”in modern parlance. On the Ottoman side, foreign archaeological activities were regarded with suspicion especially in the later part of the 19th century. In an attempt to preserve its vulnerable sovereignty, Ottoman Empire closely monitored foreign archaeological activities on its territories. For the Ottoman Empire, archaeology was also a way of projecting its image as a modern, Westernised empire. For both Russian and Ottoman archaeologists, European scholarship was regarded as an example that should be followed, and a rival at the same time. Russian archaeologists had to close down their office with the outbreak of World War I. The complications that arose with the disintegration of the institute were solved only in the late 1920s between the Soviet Union and Republican Turkey, under completely different political circumstances.
Benzer Tezler
- Doğal, tarihi kültürel açıdan turizm potansiyelini değerlendirme modeli: Ayvalık örneği
The tourism model for evaluation of natural, historical and cultural potential: A case of Ayvalık
İSMAİL HAKAN KOLCU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1993
Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiPROF. DR. VEDİA DÖKMECİ
- Humanist perception of culture and history in the 1938-1950 period of Republican Turkey
Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi?nin 1938-1950 arası döneminde hümanist kültür ve tarih anlayışı
MÜSLÜM KAVUT
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2011
Siyasal BilimlerOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. E. ATTİLA AYTEKİN
- İnsansız hava aracı (İHA) verilerinin kültürel mirasların belgelenmesinde kullanılabilirliği: Binbir Kilise örneği
Unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) data documentation of cultural heritage availability: One thousand churches
MEHMET SAMET SUCU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Jeodezi ve FotogrametriAksaray ÜniversitesiHarita Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HACI MURAT YILMAZ
- Erken Bizans Dönemi'nde Orta ve Güney Yunanistan'daki Slav izleri
The Slavic traces in the Early Byzantine Period in the Central and Southern Greece
ONUR TÜRKAY
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2022
ArkeolojiDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiArkeoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. BİNNUR GÜRLER
- Saraçhane Arkeoloji Parkı'nın kent arkeolojisi bağlamında incelenmesi ve koruma önerisi
Evaluation of the Saraçhane Archaeology Park in the context of urban archaeology and its conservation project
PELİN DOĞAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ZEYNEP ERES ÖZDOĞAN