Reproduction of the Ottoman legal knowledge:The case of İbrahim Al-Halabi's multaqa al-abhur anddefining the concept of baghy in commentarial writings on it (16th to 18th centuries)
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 720794
- Danışmanlar: DR. KENT F. SCHULL
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Hukuk, Tarih, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı, Law, History, Turkish Language and Literature
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2019
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: State University of New York at Binghamton
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 393
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This dissertation is on the emergence of a Hanafi legal textbook, Multaqa al-Abhur (written in 1517) in the Ottoman Empire, and its transformation into a discursive authority over the Ottoman legal practices and culture through commentarial reproduction of it during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The book is produced as a religio-legal textbook during the early stages of the Ottoman state's transformation into an Imperial State. Its author, Ibrahim al-Halabi wrote the book as an Arab origin Ottoman scholar in Istanbul. Al-Halabi wrote the book to help the students and teachers of fiqh (Islamic law). The religio-legal knowledge that is re-produced in the book related to practice of religion in everyday life. However, the absorption of the book into state's legal apparatuses, mainly through the official jurists using the book as source of judicial rulings, changed the representation of the book from being a fiqh book into a code of law for the state by the end of the eighteenth century. Contemporary modernist discourse picked up the state oriented view of the book and presented the production of the Ottoman legal culture as moribund and frozen from during the period from the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. The proponents of this discourse argued that commentarial authors on the book merely repeated the earlier writings and did not have originality and intellectual dynamism. This dissertation argues that the production of the Ottoman legal knowledge, shown in the example of the emergence of the Multaqa and continuous commentarial writings on it, was not moribund and static. In contrast, the v commentarial writing shows a continuous interaction and negotiation between the reproduction of legal discourse and Ottoman historical forces. To show this interaction, the dissertation argues that by the end of the sixteenth century, once the scholarly community of the jurists received the book as legally authoritative discourse, there emerged continues commentarial writings on the book of Multaqa. Through commentarial writings the discursive authority of the book was constantly reinforced and the commentarial writings provided a frame of juristic response to the changing dynamics of the Ottoman state and social formation. As a sample to exemplify this interaction, the dissertation analyzes the discursive reproduction of the definition of legal term baghy, a specific form of rebellion, in commentarial writing. The dissertation shows that, the term baghy started to be defined with more qualitative legal features added to its legal definition. The study specifically focuses on the elements of the legitimacy of sate authority, which is represented in the concept of the imam. Increasing number of commentaries are produced with more qualitative features of the Imam being highlighted and integrated into the discourse on baghy. This happened around the mid-seventeenth century, the time when sultan's authority at the central apparatuses of the state was weakened. The weakness became visible in the increasing number of the forced deposition of the sultans in the empire. A larger number of commentaries discussed the qualities of the legitimate imam when defining the term al-baghy. The dissertation also argues that there is no a linear developmental process in the production of legal knowledge and its culture in the Ottoman Empire. To demonstrate this, dissertation points out that the qualities of the Imam were already defined and discerned in Hanafi legal books by the fourteenth century. When commentators wrote their book in late sixteenth and early seventeenth century they did not pay much attention the qualities of the Imam. vi However, when sultan's position within the central state apparatuses weakened commentators started to increasingly speak about the concept of“rightful imam”in defining the act of baghy. This shows that the commentatorial writings on the Multaqa did not developed in a linear conceptual development, rather the authors were selective in their discursive chocises, and negotiaative in their production of legal discourse on baghy.
Benzer Tezler
- Sit alanını koruma politikası için bir model denemesi, örnekleme:Odunpazarı
The Development of model for the conservation policy on the historic sites. Sample:Odunpazarı
ALİ ULU
- Kentsel sit alanlarının korunmasına yönelik politikaların geliştirilmesi örneklem: Bursa-Muradiye/Hisariçi
Conservation policies on the urban sites samples: Bursa-Muradiye/Hisariçi
İLKNUR KARAKOÇ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2005
Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF.DR. CENGİZ ERUZUN
- Osmanlı 'Mimarlık Dili'nin yeniden üretimi: 1830'lardan 1930'lara bir kavramlar tarihi denemesi
The reproduction of the Ottoman 'Language of Architecture': An investigation of history of concepts from the 1830s to the 1930s
ÖMER FARUK GÜNENÇ
Doktora
Türkçe
2019
MimarlıkMardin Artuklu ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ HALİL İBRAHİM DÜZENLİ
- İktidarın mekânla imtihanı Osmanlı ve Cumhuriyet dönemi toponomi politikaları bağlamında iktidarın yeniden üretimi
Reproduction of power in the context of toponymy policies of the Ottoman and Turkish Republic
NİYAZİ DOĞAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
Siyasal Bilimlerİnönü ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MİHRİBAN ŞENGÜL
- Osmanlı'dan günümüze kamu güvenlik yönetiminde dönüşüm
From Ottoman to the present transformation in public security administration
EMRE AYDİLEK
Doktora
Türkçe
2019
Kamu YönetimiBolu Abant İzzet Baysal ÜniversitesiKamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ CENGİZ EKİZ