Institutional differences and case typicality as related to diagnosis, symptom severity, prognosis, and treatment
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 13866
- Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DOĞAN EKER
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Psikoloji, Psychology
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Klinik psikoloji, Psikiyatri klinikleri, Teşhis, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry clinics, Diagnosis
- Yıl: 1990
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Abstract The diagnostic classification system has an important function for scientific purposes in the field of psychiatry. The importance of diagnosis is to enable the clinician to reach a standard and a coimnan language not only in the treatment but in research and in training as well. Despite the agreed on importance of the diagnosis among clinicians, still a debate continues. In the present study diagnostic decision and its shortcomings were discussed by mentioning the effects of institutional differences on diagnosis and symptomatology. In relation with the diagnostic and symptom perceptual differences among the institutions, the impacts of these differences on treatment choice and prognostic decision were also taken into consideration. In order to investigate the impact of institutional differences on these variables, 55 clinicians from five different institutions participated in the study. Three video-taped actual cases were shown to the clinicians, and were asked to write down: (1) their diagnosis according to the short form of Diagnostic and Stastical Manual III, (2) their symptom ratings according to the Modified Brief Psychiatric Eating Scale, (3) their prognostic decision, and (4) their choice of treatment for each case. In this study, the first two cases were typical examples of their diagnostic categories, whereas the third case was an atypical one. Institutional comparisons regarding the 1four dependent variables have been carried out for those three cases. The results indicated that institutional differences play an important role especially in the atypical case on all dependent variables, namely; diagnostic decision, perception of symptom severity, prognostic decision and treatment choice of the clinicians. The standart diagnostic criteria seemed to be short of creating a precise agreement especially in the cases of an ambigious nature.
Benzer Tezler
- Antalya ilindeki epidermolizis bülloza tanılı hastaların aile hekimliği bakış açısıyla değerlendirilmesi
Assessment of patients diagnosed with epidermolysis bullosa in Antalya province from the perspective of family medicine
TUĞBA BALIK KOZAK
Tıpta Uzmanlık
Türkçe
2023
Aile HekimliğiSağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiAile Hekimliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ZEYNEP AŞIK
- Para piyasasında banka dışı mali kesimde finansal farklılaşma: Factoring, forfaiting, leasing ve özel finans kurumları
Başlık çevirisi yok
MÜGEHAN ACARASLAN
- Somuttan soyuta: Temel tasarım stüdyosunda bir başlangıç pratiği olarak yaparak tasarlama
From concrete to abstract: Designing by doing as an initial practice in basic design studio
BERİL GÖK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. YÜKSEL DEMİR
- Analyzing transition dynamics the actor-option framework for modelling socio-technical systems
Başlık çevirisi yok
GÖNENÇ YÜCEL
Doktora
İngilizce
2010
Endüstri Ürünleri TasarımıTechnısche Unıversıteıt Delft (delft Unıversıty Of Technology)PROF. C. E. VAN DAALEN
- Hikâye ile Zenginleştirilmiş Bilişsel Gelişim Programının (COGENT) okul öncesi çocuklarının erken okuryazarlık becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi
An examination of the effects of the Story-enriched Cognitive Development Program (COGENT) on preschool children's early literacy skills
FATMA KOÇ
Doktora
Türkçe
2026
Eğitim ve Öğretimİstanbul Aydın ÜniversitesiTemel Eğitim Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. BELMA TUĞRUL