Türkiye'de kentleşme ve kat mülkiyeti
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 20873
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. RUŞEN KELEŞ
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Public Administration
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1992
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 213
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
only to that of well-to-do economies with very high national incomes. Over-production in housing, exceeding in most cases the identifiable 'need', indicate to the 'supply-motivated' nature of constructional activities under the FO relations. FO motivated blocks of flats constitute the greatest parts of housing production since 1960's. Fluctuations in production are observed also to be dominated by factors directly related to apartment construction. Invest ments in such construction seem to gravitate towards external sources rather than remain endemic to the city, The greater proportion of investments are either transferred from abroad or from the rural background. Agricultural rent (almost pointlessly), seems to be channelled to the urban areas, contributing massively to the building-up of cities. Despite the impressive transfers of capital to the urban constructional sector, no real accumulation and transforma tions in production seems to have taken place in the sector during the thirty years of FO practice. The building stock as generated by FO relations, represent also a pool of values in relation to which the social structure of the populations in the cities are determined. With reference to housing ownership, it is possible to identify the formation of a strong 'rentier' class, owner occupiers, house owning tenants and plain tenants, not to mention the janitor households, all symbiotically taking part in the formation of blocks of flats. These groups of households seem to represent distinct and permanent classes. The cleaveges FO generates in society are real and effective as empirical evidence have indicated. It has been observed that the multi-layered structure dictated by the FO relations are as meaningful a differentiation as the conventional 'owner occupier-tenant' distinction. The physical and social destiny of the Turkish cities have thus been cast with the single factor of FO.KAYNAKÇA ABADAN, N. (1949) îsveç Evleri, Karınca (15:146) 23-26 ; Ulus Gazetesi, 6 Şubat. ABADAN, N., KELEŞ, Ketal. (1976) Migration and Development, Ajans Türk. ABİRAL, E. (1950) Kat Mülkiyeti, Cumhuriyet Gazetesi, 25 Şubat. ABRAMOVITZ, M. (1961) The Nature and Significance of Kuznets Cycles, Economic Develop ment, and Cultural Change (9) 225-248. ABRAMOVITZ,M. (1964) Evidences of Long Swings in Aggregate Construction since the Civil War, National Bureau of Economic Research, NY. ABRAMOVITZ, M. (1968) The Passing of the Kuznets Cycle, Economica (35)349-367. ABU-LUGHOD, J., HAY, R. (1977) Third World Urbanization, Methuen, London. AGNEW, JA. (1981) Ownership and the Capitalist Social Order, Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society, eds. M.Dear, AJ. Scott,UP, 456-480. AKÇURA, T. (1974) Urbanization in Turkey and Some Examples, Turkey: Geographic and Social Perspectives, eds. P. Benedict, E. Tümertekin, F. Mansur, EJ.Brill, Leiden. AKITA, T., FUJITA, M. (1982) Spatial Development Processes with Renewal in a Growing City, Environment and Planning (14) 205- 223. AKTÜRE, T. (1982) Konutta Maliyet Ödeme Gücü İlişkisi, Konut 81, Kentkoop, Özgün Matbaacılık, Ankara. ALAÇAM, S. (1949) Yurttaşları Mesken Sahibi Yapmak Amacıyla Çıkartılan iki Kanun ve Bunlann Ankara'da Tatbiki,//fer ve Belediyeler Dergisi (47) 18-21,47; (48) 22-29,58-60; (49) 30- 39. ALBERTS, W.W. (1962) Business Cycles, Residential Construction Cycles and the Mortgage Market, Journal of Political Economy (70) 263-281. ALİSBAH, H. (1955) Birinci İmar Kongresi, İller ve Belediyeler Dergisi (12) 208-212; 280-287; 342-346. AMAÇ, E. (1955) Hisseli Gayrimenkullerde Kat ve Daire Mülkiyeti, İller ve Belediyeler Dergisi (12) 665-666. AMİN, S. (1978) The Law of Value and Historical Materialism,Monthly Review Press, London. ANİ, M.C. (1946) Ankara Kooperatiflerinin Belediyeden İstekleri, Temennileri, Karınca (13:115) 8-17. ARCAK, A. (1988) Açıklamalı, İçtihattı Kat Mülkiyeti Kanunu, Seçkin Kitabevi, Ankara.
Benzer Tezler
- Kentsel mekanın değişimi ve konut dokusunda katmanlaşma: Feneryolu Mahallesi örneği
Transformation of the urban space and stratification in the housing stock: The case of Feneryolu Neighborhood
BURCU ARIKAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2013
Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. GÜLÇİN PULAT GÖKMEN
- Düşey mülkiyet haklarının 3-boyutlu yönetimi için yapı bilgi modellemesi (Bim)-tabanlı bütünleşik bir modelin geliştirilmesi ve üç-parçalı döngü yaklaşımı
Development of a building information modeling (Bim)-based integrated model for 3-dimensional management of vertical property rights and tripartite cycle proposal
DOĞUŞ GÜLER
Doktora
Türkçe
2022
Jeodezi ve Fotogrametriİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiGeomatik Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. TAHSİN YOMRALIOĞLU
- Türkiye'de kitlesel konut üretim sürecinde değişen paydaş ilişkilerinin haritalandırılması
Relationship changing stakeholder mapping of the mass housing production process in Turkey
CEREN SEVİNTİ ASLAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
MimarlıkYıldız Teknik ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. CANDAN ÇITAK
- Parsel bazlı kentsel dönüşümün kentsel çevreye ve kimlik algısına etkileri: Bahçelievler örneği
The effect of parcel based urban transformation on urban environment and perception of identity: The case of Bahcelievler
KERİME SEVEN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2022
Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaÇankaya ÜniversitesiKentsel Dönüşüm Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ DENİZ ALTAY KAYA
