Hukuk felsefesi açısından John Locke'un ihtilal hakkı teorisi
John Locke's theory of revolution
- Tez No: 26016
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. ADNAN GÜRİZ
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1993
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 120
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
SUMMARY JOHN LOCKE'S THEORY OF REVOLUTION John Locke, like Hobbes, begins with man in a“state of nature”. By nature, man are free (that is, independent of one anothers control) and equal. If society is not natural to man, however reason is. Reason, which is the“law of nature'*, ”theaches all mankind, who will but cosult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possesions.“ The state of nature, which reason discovers as self-evident obliges everyman to act to as to preserve himself and others. The state of nature constitutes a predicament, however. Man is independent and equal but he is also insecure. This is so because there is no common authority to adjudicate violations of law of nature and punish offenders. Each man in the state of nature is his own interpreter and enforcer of the law of nature. The fact results in a highly men become blind to any interpretation of reasons law but their own, and in fact act against that law. The state of nature ( a peaceful state) is transformed into a state of war. Men leave the state of nature and enter civil society to secure and impartial and regular interpretation and application of the law of nature. Locke contends that all men are in the state of nature and remain so till by their own consents they make themselves members of some politic society. All legitimate government thus rest on consent. The principal purpose of government, the reason why men give up the state of nature for civil society, is ”for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties, and estates, which he calls by the general name, property. Locke insist upon the separation of powers: Legislative, executive and federative. Legislation is the supreme function of the state. The formulation of rules by which life, liberty, and property are to be secured is 105SUMMARY JOHN LOCKE'S THEORY OF REVOLUTION John Locke, like Hobbes, begins with man in a“state of nature”. By nature, man are free (that is, independent of one anothers control) and equal. If society is not natural to man, however reason is. Reason, which is the“law of nature'*, ”theaches all mankind, who will but cosult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possesions.“ The state of nature, which reason discovers as self-evident obliges everyman to act to as to preserve himself and others. The state of nature constitutes a predicament, however. Man is independent and equal but he is also insecure. This is so because there is no common authority to adjudicate violations of law of nature and punish offenders. Each man in the state of nature is his own interpreter and enforcer of the law of nature. The fact results in a highly men become blind to any interpretation of reasons law but their own, and in fact act against that law. The state of nature ( a peaceful state) is transformed into a state of war. Men leave the state of nature and enter civil society to secure and impartial and regular interpretation and application of the law of nature. Locke contends that all men are in the state of nature and remain so till by their own consents they make themselves members of some politic society. All legitimate government thus rest on consent. The principal purpose of government, the reason why men give up the state of nature for civil society, is ”for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties, and estates, which he calls by the general name, property. Locke insist upon the separation of powers: Legislative, executive and federative. Legislation is the supreme function of the state. The formulation of rules by which life, liberty, and property are to be secured is 105
Benzer Tezler
- Le rapport des droits de l'homme au politique: Lefort et Rancière
İnsan haklarının politik-olan bağlantısı: Lefort ve Rancière
EYLEM YOLSAL MURTEZA
Doktora
Fransızca
2022
FelsefeGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ALİYE KARABÜK KOVANLIKAYA
- Hugo Grotius ve John Locke'da doğal hukuk öğretisi
The doctrine of natural law in Hugo Grotius and John Locke
MUSTAFA CAN ÖZDEMİR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
HukukFatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ İSMAİL KILLIOĞLU
- Toplum sözleşmesinin felsefi kaynaklarını aramak: Thomas Hobbes, John Locke ve Jean Jacques Rousseau mukayesesi
Looking for the philosophical sources of the societh concract: The comparison of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau's
MEHMET KUTLU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
Siyasal BilimlerMuş Alparslan ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ YUSUF ÇİFCİ
- Toplum sözleşmesi düşüncesinde devletin doğuşu: Hobbes, Locke Rousseau
Establishment of state with in the context of social contract
ULAŞ KARADAĞ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2013
FelsefeAnkara ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. ABDURRAHMAN SAYGILI
- Modern siyaset felsefesinde sözleşme teorisi
The contract theory in modern political philosophy
MEHMET FATİH DENİZ