Kentsel tasarım kapsamında tarihi kentsel mekanlarda arayüzlerin düzenlenmesine sistemli bir yaklaşım
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 29026
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. MEHMET ÇUBUK
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Mimarlık, Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlama, Architecture, Urban and Regional Planning
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1993
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 237
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
m ABSTRACT Many researchs are taken into consideration in several countries as a result of the sharp contrast between urban development and visual quality in 1960's afterwards. One of the actual common features of Turkish cities which everyone related or not agreed upon are the poor visual quality and the lack of spatial identity which domiates almost everywhere. The basic framework of this thesis,“INTERFACE'S are surfaces made of the total of architectural facades at the crossection of urban exteriors and built areas of cities. ”Interfaces“ are surfaces enough suitable to show urban transformations as well as one of the most concrete means to exhibit general level of social structure. The present state of ”interfaces“ as an outcome of sophisticated relationships and togetherness of various elements out of given architectural style is the basic problem area which is tuckled as a whole within the framework of the thesis. First chapter is an introduction which defines ”interfaces“ as considered within the frame of urban structure and urban fabric, as an outcome of mutual relationships and influence of urban typology, morphology and topology between and upon to each other. According to this definition there is an ”interface“ between natural and urban, negative and positive space, space and meaning and activity and form. ”Interface“ physically develops as a loading gauge and semantically within the frame of architectural elements. The second chapter İs a collection of some examples from abroad which underlines the techniques, methods and evaluations related with the ”interfaces“ And ”interfaces“ are considered within the context of urban design including more sensitive approaches in historic urban texture.IV Following third chapter is devoted to local examples which shows in traditional urban textures ”intertacial“ differences of climate, geography and socio-economic conditions are only reflections of local variations, not true differentiations. Which provides an almost uniform visual quality in such areas is the use of at common vernacular style. However this is mostly changed as a result of westernization which affects the society in different ways since the Late Ottoman Period Transformation is mostly visible in spatial structure, dimensions and in taste of design. In Republican Period ”interfaces“ are examined within the context of building, building regulations and architectural style and the facts that ”good“, ”beautiful“ and ”true“ genuine architectural taste which exists naturally inside of almost everyone is transformed to a ”bad“, ”disguising“ and ”false“ achitecture and hereby the reality that traditional urban textures are not well preserved are pointed out as a final result. Now ”interfaces“ are currently shaped with chaotic forms (against of order) individual approaches (in contrast with environmental harmony) and varied styles (difference of unity). Within the legal aspects of subject matler many similar ”interfaces“ appeared as an outcome of building regulations in planning procedures of Turkey. However ”interfaces“ are common interest of urban planning, urban design and architecture, therefore, a cooperated attempt on this subject is highly crucial. Undefined legal base and techical frame of urban design between architecture and urban planning in Turkey is a real obstacle for a proper practice of urban design. As a result, the fourth chapter is a proposal for designing ”interfaces" in historic urban fabrics and in urban design within the scape of systems approach. Here the basic problem is the definition of design criteria for a harmonious unity between the old and the new. The model therefore aims at an integration within the area of urban desgin and within the context of cultural continuity and, thus, at a contribution to the studies on the third dimension. For the model proposed an example area study in İstiklal Street at Beyoğlu, İstanbul is also added.
Benzer Tezler
- Müze bahçelerinin alternatif açık alan olarak kullanılmasının kentsel yaşam üzerindeki etkileri: İstanbul örneği
The effects of using museum gardens as an alternative open space on urban life: Istanbul case
DAMLA ERENLER
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiKentsel Tasarım Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ İSMAİL EREN KÜRKÇÜOĞLU
- Sosyal sermaye odaklı kentsel canlandırma yaklaşımı: Yeldeğirmeni örneği
Social capital led urban revitalization approach: Yeldegirmeni case
ALP CAN ARISOY
Doktora
Türkçe
2019
Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. NURBİN PAKER KAHVECİOĞLU
- Bir uzlaşma ortamı olarak tuval-mekan
Canvas-space as a medium of reconciliation
ATIL AGGÜNDÜZ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HÜSEYİN LÜTFÜ KAHVECİOĞLU
- Kentsel imaj öğeleri bağlamında Haliç bölgesinin incelenmesi
Survey of Haliç region in the context of urban image
EMİNE TAYYARE
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2007
Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaYıldız Teknik ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ZEKİYE YENEN
- Mekansal kimliğin sürdürülmesinde tarihi kent merkezlerinin kamusal gücünün kentsel tasarım bağlamında değerlendirilmesi: İstiklal Caddesi aksı ve Taksim Meydanı (İstanbul) örneği
Public power of historical city centers in sustaining spatial identity through implications of urban design: The case of Istiklal Street and Taksim Square (Istanbul)
SELİN SARGUT GELEN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2016
Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ALİYE EMEL GÖKSU