Geri Dön

Apologia in Xenophon's Anabasis

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401333
  2. Yazar: SHANE BRENNAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. STEPHEN MITCHELL, PROF. DANIEL OGDEN
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Tarih, History
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2011
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Exeter
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 268

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Xenophon of Athens probably did not write his Anabasis until thirty years or more after the events which it describes. This remarkable gap, taken together with the absence of a prologue, the presence of a number of prominent themes and authorial concerns, and the complex literary construction of the work, has made the task of explaining it problematic. Situating the text in the context of Xenophon's later life and wide-ranging literary output, in this dissertation I argue that apologia is the defining element in the work. Through his elaborate narrative structure and representation of his own character, Xenophon is defending himself, his social class, and his teacher, Socrates. In Books 5 and 7 (of 7) he is occupied with a rigorous defence of his conduct on the retreat, answering charges of deceiving the soldiers, hubris, corruption, and mercenary service, while in Books 3 through to 7, he is defending the memory of Socrates. For from the point of his introduction into the text at the opening of Book 3, following the decapitation of the Greek High Command at the Greater Zab River, Xenophon the character is acting as a pupil of Socrates would have done had he found himself in similarly dire circumstances. His actions, counsel, and moral bearing during the course of the retreat are a testimony to the value of his teacher's training, and powerfully undermine the charges of impiety and corrupting the youth levelled against Socrates in 399. At the same time, the outstanding leadership performance on the retreat of Xenophon's character reflects on himself as the historical figure behind the exemplar. By highlighting its different forms and bringing out its pervasiveness, the dissertation demonstrates that apologia is the major factor in the formation of the text.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Ksenophon'un Anabasis'inde söylevlerin yeri

    Significance of the speeches in Xenophon's Anabasis

    OĞUZ YARLIGAŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2008

    Eski Çağ Dilleri ve Kültürleriİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Eskiçağ Dilleri ve Kültürleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. A. VEDAT ÇELGİN

  2. Nietzsche'nin Sokrates hakkındaki düşünceleri bağlamında 'Sokrates problemi'ne bakış

    An approach to 'Problem of Socrates' through the context of Nietzsche's thoughts about Socrates

    EBRU AYDIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2016

    FelsefeHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. CEMAL GÜZEL

  3. Iustinus Martyr'in Birinci Apologia'sı Kapsamında Pagan Düşünce

    The Pagan Thought in the Iustinus Martyr's First Apology

    MERT AYSOYSAL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    Dinİbn Haldun Üniversitesi

    Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ZAFER DUYGU

  4. Kriz iletişiminde kurumsal savunca kuramı: Türkiye'deki krizlerin özür metinlerinin incelenmesi

    Corporate apologia theory to crisis communication: Examining the text of the apology crisis in Turkey

    GAMZE TERZİ KÖROĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2018

    Halkla İlişkilerKadir Has Üniversitesi

    Halkla İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. BURAK ÖZÇETİN

  5. Platon'da Daimōn ve Daımonıon ile irtibatı içerisinde epistēmē

    Epistēmē in connexion to Daimōn and Daimonion in Plato

    SEDA YALÇIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    FelsefeGümüşhane Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ÜMİT ÖZTÜRK