Geri Dön

Bilgisayar programlarının hukuki korunması

Legal protection of computer programs

  1. Tez No: 64006
  2. Yazar: SERHAT KAYPAKOĞLU
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. ZİYA AKINCI
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1997
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 223

Özet

nı ABSTRACT In this thesis, the legal protection of computer programs following the amendment of Turkish Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works, in June 1995 has been studied. With this amendment not only Turkish legislation on computer software was harmonised with the EU Directive on the Legal Protection of Com puter Programs, the pressing need for a legislative guidance on the subject had also been met. With the understanding that USA is the first country in the world to pass a legislative motion on the subject, the works of prominent American jurists and lawyers of software law were tried to be exploited extensively. Some of the major American landmark cases have also been looked into. The topic was covered in four chapters. In the first chapter, following a brief introduction of some basic technical concepts, the different legal frameworks that had been considered for the protection of computer programs before copyright had been chosen, are examined. Various theories and opinions for and against protecting software under copyright law have also been probed into. In the second chapter related international agreements to which Turkey was a party were primarily looked into, and then Articles 2 and 6 of Turkish Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works were discussed. Since not only these but all of the clauses on computer programs in this Turkish law originate from the EU Direc tive, Articles thereto were almost always cross-referred throughout the whole the sis. " The problematic issues like the protection of non-literal elements of com puter programs, correction of program errors, interoperability and reverse engi neering are the highlighted topics of the third chapter. On the subject of copyright protection of the non-literal elements, Whelan v. Jaslow, Lotus v. Paperback, Computer Associates v. Altai and Lotus v. Borland cases were outlined.IV Software contracts, validity of the shrink-wrap licenses, civil and penal remedies against infringements and violations of copyrights are the topics of foutfh chapter. As the conclusion, the opinion that has been reached is that most of the contentious issues could have been avoided had sui generis legal protection been chosen for computer programs instead of copyright law. It is also been thought that because some of the stipulation of Turkish Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works can be misleading if due care is not given, comprehensive analysis should not be ignored in litigation and when drafting software contracts.

Özet (Çeviri)

nı ABSTRACT In this thesis, the legal protection of computer programs following the amendment of Turkish Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works, in June 1995 has been studied. With this amendment not only Turkish legislation on computer software was harmonised with the EU Directive on the Legal Protection of Com puter Programs, the pressing need for a legislative guidance on the subject had also been met. With the understanding that USA is the first country in the world to pass a legislative motion on the subject, the works of prominent American jurists and lawyers of software law were tried to be exploited extensively. Some of the major American landmark cases have also been looked into. The topic was covered in four chapters. In the first chapter, following a brief introduction of some basic technical concepts, the different legal frameworks that had been considered for the protection of computer programs before copyright had been chosen, are examined. Various theories and opinions for and against protecting software under copyright law have also been probed into. In the second chapter related international agreements to which Turkey was a party were primarily looked into, and then Articles 2 and 6 of Turkish Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works were discussed. Since not only these but all of the clauses on computer programs in this Turkish law originate from the EU Direc tive, Articles thereto were almost always cross-referred throughout the whole the sis. " The problematic issues like the protection of non-literal elements of com puter programs, correction of program errors, interoperability and reverse engi neering are the highlighted topics of the third chapter. On the subject of copyright protection of the non-literal elements, Whelan v. Jaslow, Lotus v. Paperback, Computer Associates v. Altai and Lotus v. Borland cases were outlined.IV Software contracts, validity of the shrink-wrap licenses, civil and penal remedies against infringements and violations of copyrights are the topics of foutfh chapter. As the conclusion, the opinion that has been reached is that most of the contentious issues could have been avoided had sui generis legal protection been chosen for computer programs instead of copyright law. It is also been thought that because some of the stipulation of Turkish Law of Intellectual and Artistic Works can be misleading if due care is not given, comprehensive analysis should not be ignored in litigation and when drafting software contracts.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Türk Hukukunda bilgisayar programlarının hukuki korunması

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    FIRAT ÇİNİCİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2004

    HukukGazi Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. OĞUZ KÜRŞAT ÜNAL

  2. Bilgisayar programlarındaki değişikliklerin Fikrî Hukuk kapsamında değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of changes in computer programs in the scope of intellectual Property Law

    TUĞBA AKDEMİR KAMALI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2014

    HukukYaşar Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. EMRE CUMALIOĞLU

  3. Bilgisayar programlarının hukuki yolla korunması

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    AHMET KURTULMUŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1992

    Hukukİstanbul Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. CAN TUNCAY

  4. Bilgisayar programlarının fikri mülkiyet hukuku çerçevesinde korunması

    Intellectual property protection on computer programs

    EMİNE SENA YAZICI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Hukukİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. FERNA İPEKEL KAYALI

  5. Bilgisayar programlarının fikri mülkiyet hukuku kapsamında korunması

    Protection of computer programs in intellectual property law

    SIRMA KORKUT EMRAĞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Hukukİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ EDA ÇATAKLAR