Public policy as a ground for refusingrecognition and enforcement of new yorkconvention awards in england and Turkey
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 645663
- Danışmanlar: DR. RİCHARD EARLE
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: International Commercial Arbitration, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Award, New York Convention, Grounds for Refusal, Public Policy Exception, English Law, Turkish Law
- Yıl: 2017
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Westminster
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 54
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
The strong connection between arbitration as a dispute resolution and the recognition and enforcement of the arbitral awards requires an effective set of rules which is applicable world-wide. The New York Convention provides such provision; however, its success heavily relies on the appropriate application and interpretation by the national courts. Public policy is one of the limited grounds provided by the convention for refusing recognition and enforcement of convention awards. Unfortunately, the convention did not provide a definition or criteria for interpreting such ground. Therefore, different courts across the world have applied this exception different, sometimes, unfairly. In this paper, the public policy considerations of English and Turkish Courts will be examined, presented and compared. In order to do that, firstly, in the light of New York Convention, the general overview of recognition and enforcement of convention awards will be drawn. In the second place, the public policy expectations in the decision of English Courts will be observed. Following to this, the attitude of Turkish Courts towards the public policy exception will be determined. In conclusion, the findings from the English and Turkish courts will be compared and certain ideas will be presented in order to improve recognition and enforcement of foreign awards in Turkey.
Benzer Tezler
- Milletlerarası unsurlu hakem kararlarının Türk mahkemelerinde kamu düzenine aykırılığının yargısal denetimi
Judicial review of public policy violations in arbitral awards with international element by Turkish courts
BERFU ESEN ATAK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2025
HukukAnkara Hacı Bayram Veli ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MUSTAFA ALPER ENER
- Çevre yönetiminde bir katılım aracı olarak Yerel Gündem 21 (İznik örneği)
Local Agenda 21 as a participatory instrument of environmental management (the İznik case)
AFİFE KUDAL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2002
Kamu YönetimiAnkara ÜniversitesiÇevre Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF.DR. CAN HAMAMCI
- The recognition and enforcement of foreignarbitral awards in Turkey: A critical study of thepublic policy exception'
Başlık çevirisi yok
ŞERİFE HANDE ÖZÇELİK
