Geri Dön

Financial assistance prohibition andits impact on leveraged buyouts:An analysis from the perspective ofthe eu and Turkish Law

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 706501
  2. Yazar: MERVE ÖZEL
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. IOANNİS KOKKORİS
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2022
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Queen Mary University of London
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 63

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Turkey adopted financial assistance prohibition for the first time in 2012 under Article 380 of the TCC on the base of EU Second Directive 77/91/EEC despite the fact that it was proven to be a very contentious issue and most of the jurisdictions have displaced a preference of removing it given its impact on LBOs. In this light, this dissertation questions whether this prohibition was in fact required to be adopted into Turkish law in the first place. EU Second Directive was amended in 2006 and the prohibition was softened for public companies by bringing ex-ante system so long as the conditions set forth in the Article have been met. However, Turkey adopted the previous regulation which was prohibiting all public companies from giving financial assistance to the third parties. This was deemed as ex-post outright prohibition for public companies as will be explained below. As Turkey did not adopt the ex-ante regime, all joint stock companies are prohibited from giving financial assistance under Article 380 of the TCC. Therefore, this dissertation assesses whether the ex-post system was appropriate and sensible in which all joint-stock companies, either publicly held or not, were prohibited to give financial assistance instead of the ex-ante system. Transcending the above questions, at any event, this dissertation considers whether the transfer into Turkish law is likely to create problems of interpretation in light of the Article 23 of the Second Directive as a source law that Turkey based.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Türkiye'de su hakkı

    The right to water in Turkey

    YILDIZ AKEL ÜNAL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ERDOĞAN BÜLBÜL

  2. Tanzimat Dönemi İstanbul'unda iç güvenlik ve suçla mücadele

    Internal security and struggle against crime in İstanbul the Tanzimat Period

    UFUK KILINÇ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    TarihÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi

    Tarih Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ALİ SÖNMEZ

  3. حكم الربا وآثاره على عقود المعاوضات المالية

    İslam hukukunda riba ile ilgili işlemlerin hükümleri ve finansal işlemler üzerindeki etkileri / The ruling on usury and its effects on financial contracts

    ASKAR KHALEEL HUSSEIN AL-ZAIDI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Arapça

    Arapça

    2021

    DinKarabük Üniversitesi

    Temel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. FAHRETTİN ATAR

  4. Yargıtay'ın anonim ve limited şirket faaliyetleri kapsamında işlenen vergi kaçakçılığı suçlarında kanuni temsilcinin sorumluluğuna ilişkin yaklaşımının değerlendirilmesi

    Evaluation of the Court of cassation's approach to the liability of the legal representative for tax evasion crimes committed within the scope of corporation and limited liability company activities

    MERT ANIL GÜLER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ BALCA ÇELENER