Geri Dön

Sweatshopsa normative analysis

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

PDF İndir

  1. Tez No: 719131
  2. Yazar: HUSEYİN SUNGUR KUYUMCUOGLU
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. CHRİSTOPHER MORGAN-KNAPP
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri, Labour Economics and Industrial Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2020
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: State University of New York at Binghamton
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 181

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

This dissertation lays out certain moral issues related to sweatshop labor, and suggests solutions to them. In the first place, I scan the literature on exploitation and show that each prominent theory of exploitation proves some sweatshops to be exploitative. This result gives one moral reason to activists and sweatshop critics for interfering in the conditions of these workplaces. Later, I analyze the challenge posed by sweatshop defenders against the critics that interference in these workplaces by means of boycotts, tariffs, law enforcement, etc. actually either harms or disrespects the workers it intends to help. This is sometimes called the“choice argument.”In response to this argument, I develop a contractualist argument to morally justify interference in sweatshops. Finally, I engage in a discussion regarding the moral duty of individuals as consumers to alleviate adverse circumstances in sweatshops. I take boycotts as an exemplary case, and show that except for some specific situations, consumers have a duty to participate in well-organized boycotts. In the entirety of this dissertation, I am doing a threefold work: 1) I investigate the literature on the concept of exploitation to find out which theory best explains the relevant moral wrong in sweatshops. 2) I show that the defense of sweatshop jobs based on the choice argument—formulated by some scholars to defend sweatshops—is an untenable position. Moreover, as a response to the choice argument, I provide a iv basis for possible strategies for interference in sweatshop conditions. And finally, 3) I lay out the moral duties of groups and individuals for improving the situation.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    671992

    Impact of corporate sustainability reporting on firm performance/ investor decisions: Evidence from Turkey

    Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporlamasının şirket performansı/ yatırımcı kararları üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği

    EYLÜL ÖZDARAK

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2021

    İşletmeMarmara Üniversitesi

    İşletme (İngilizce) Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ÇAĞATAY AKARÇAY

  2. Tez No

    545949

    Küreselleşme sürecinde mülteciler vaka analizi: 'Made ın Turkey' etiketinin arkasındakiler

    Refugees in the era of globalization case study: behind 'Made in Turkey' label

    ADELİNA IONA SAVA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    SosyolojiEge Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ÖZGÜR BUDAK

  3. Tez No

    277751

    Sermayenin etik inşası: Küresel meta zincirleri ve çalışma standartları

    Ethical fabrication of capital: Global commodity chains and labour standards

    AHMET BEKMEN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2011

    Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileriİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. FATMAGÜL BERKTAY

  4. Tez No

    400472

    Conveyor belt of flesh: Urban space and proliferation of the industrial labor practices

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    UTKU BALABAN

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2011

    SosyolojiState University of New York at Binghamton

    Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. ÇAĞLAR KEYDER

Geri Dön