Interwar pronatalism in Turkey: Its formation, discourse,and institutions
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 719237
- Danışmanlar: DR. ÇAĞLAR KEYDER
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Siyasal Bilimler, Political Science
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2020
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: State University of New York at Binghamton
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 333
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This is a study on interwar pronatalism in Turkey. I argue that interwar pronatalism in Turkey was shaped not only by demographic conditions but also by the historical, international, and ideological context within the limits of state capacity, and in return became one of the constitutive fields of discourse and policy of the new regime. These factors made Turkey a part of the general trend of pronatalism, but also gave Turkish pronatalism its specific character. The ideological context refers to a pattern woven by positioning vis-à-vis the West, ethnic nationalism and anti-individualism. Starting with the late Ottoman Empire, the relationship with the West developed in a form where the West was both the model to be followed, the civilization to be a part of, and also a threat to be cautious of. Turkish interwar pronatalism also followed this pattern. In the atmosphere of rivalry and paranoia of the interwar period, increasing population, creating a healthy and fit population, demonstrating the trends of ethnic homogenization and population growth through census results were the priorities of interwar pronatalism that saw the West as a threat. Ethnic nationalism shaped and in return was supported by interwar pronatalism mainly in the population exchange and population censuses. Anti-individualism was at the core of interwar pronatalisms in describing reproduction as a field of conflict of interest between the individuals and the state, and offering the solution of pronatalist population policies. v I analyzed two institutions of pronatalism in interwar Turkey: the parliament and the General Directorate of Statistics. I examined the laws and records of parliamentary discussions, the history of the GDS, population censuses and the Analysis Series. My analysis shows how they were a part of interwar pronatalism, and how state capacity –in terms of limited resources and educated personnel– was a defining factor of interwar pronatalism
Benzer Tezler
- Assessing regime survivability during civil wars: A comparative analysis of the Russian (1917-22) and the Spanish (1936-39) civil wars
Rejimlerin iç savaşlardaki dayanma güçlerinin incelenmesi: Rus (1917-22) ve İspanyol (1936-39) iç savaşlarının karşılaştırmalı bir analizi
AYBARS ARDA KILIÇER
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2023
Siyasal BilimlerKoç ÜniversitesiUluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ŞENER AKTÜRK
- İki dünya savaşı arası dönemde Doğu Akdeniz: Uluslararası rekabet ve diplomasi
Eastern Mediterranean in the interwar period: International competition and diplomacy
YILDIZ ÇALIKKILIÇ
- Morality, loyalty and citizenship: Youth organization in interwar Albania
Ahlak, sadakat ve vatandaşlık: İki savaş arası Arnavutluk'ta gençlik orgutleri
FALMA FSHAZİ
Doktora
İngilizce
2012
Siyasal BilimlerBoğaziçi ÜniversitesiTürkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. AYDIN BABUNA
- Liderler bağlamında iki savaş arası dönemde Bulgaristan
Bulgaria during the interwar period in the context of leaders
NEBAHAT KOÇ
Doktora
Türkçe
2021
Uluslararası İlişkilerTrakya ÜniversitesiUluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. SİBEL TURAN
- Turkish-Italian relations in the interwar period
İki savaş arası dönemde Türk-İtalyan ilişkileri
HAZAL PAPUÇÇULAR
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2009
TarihBoğaziçi ÜniversitesiAtatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. AYDIN BABUNA