Knowledge in action
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 760185
- Danışmanlar: PROF. SEAN KELLY
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi, Information and Records Management
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2013
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Harvard University
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 153
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
It is widely acknowledged that an agent is doing A intentionally only if she knows she is doing A. It has proved difficult, however, to reconcile two natural thoughts about this knowledge. On the one hand, the agent seems to know what she is doing immediately, simply by doing it. Her knowledge seems to rely upon no evidence, and indeed to rest upon no specifiable epistemic basis at all. On the other hand, the agent can be wrong about what she is doing; she is fallible. The difficulty is to see how an agent can be wrong about her action if her knowledge of it is immediate. My dissertation provides an account of the agent's knowledge of her own actions that reconciles these natural, but apparently conflicting thoughts. In the face of this difficulty, many philosophers distinguish two objects of knowledge in action: the object of immediate knowledge, which is supposed to be something interior, and what the agent actually does, which is known only mediately. I argue that this two-factor framework is unacceptable, since it cannot account for the insight which motivated the study of intentional action via the agent's knowledge of these actions: that it is in virtue of this specific way of knowing that the agent is the agent of her intentional actions. Instead, I defend a view on which acting intentionally itself, with no need for further epistemic work, is a way of knowing what actually happens. "# This account of knowledge in action also allows me to clarify how this knowledge is necessarily related to our capacity for agency. I argue that the rational capacities that are drawn on in figuring out what to do here and now are the very source of both the action's taking place, and the agent's knowledge of her actions without evidence. Since the agent's knowledge is the result of the very same reasoning that brings about the action, it is practical, and the agent's having it is the mark of her practical rationality at work and her being the knowingly efficacious author of the action.
Benzer Tezler
- Learning from the construction site: An epistemological investigation of stonemasons and architects in action
Başlık çevirisi yok
ELİF KENDİR BERAHA
Doktora
İngilizce
2014
MimarlıkRMIT University (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology)Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. SUZETTE WORDEN
PROF. MARK BURRY
- Gadamer'in eğitim kuramında Aristoteles'in phronésis kavramının rolü
The role of Aristotle's phronésis concept in Gadamer's theory of education
GÜL ESİN SERTTEK
Doktora
Türkçe
2024
Eğitim ve ÖğretimAnkara ÜniversitesiEğitimin Kültürel Temelleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HASAN ÜNDER
- English as a foreign language teachers' technology professional development through online communities of practice: a case study
Yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğretmenlerinin çevrimiçi uğraş toplulukları aracılığıyla teknlojik mesleki gelişimleri: Bir vaka çalışması
ALİ BOSTANCIOĞLU
- Exploring the potential of online platforms in product design: A study on integrating craftsmen into systems of design
Ürün tasarımında çevrimiçi platformların potansiyeli: Zanaatkarların tasarım sistemlerine entegrasyonu üzerine bir çalışma
BARIŞ GÜMÜŞTAŞ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2015
Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımıİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiEndüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ŞEBNEM TİMUR ÖĞÜT
- Problem çözme konuşmalarında bilgi kaybı: Bilgi yönetim döngüsünün sosyalleştirme aşamasında bilgi reddi
Knowledge loss in problem talk: Knowledge rejection duri̇ng socialization stage of knowledge management cycle
MEHMET SELİM DERİNDERE
Doktora
Türkçe
2021
Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimiİstanbul ÜniversitesiEnformatik Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. SEVİNÇ GÜLSEÇEN