Geri Dön

Obtaining evidence from noncooperative parties/non-parties ininternational arbitration law inFrance and The Usa

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 768532
  2. Yazar: MEHMET BURAK AYDOĞAN
  3. Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2020
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Sussex
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 35

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Evidence taking process is a key part of international arbitration proceedings. Without adequate evidence, an arbitrator cannot establish the facts of the case; and render a fair award. On the other hand, some parties/non-parties may be unwilling to produce evidence, considering the requested evidence might be unfavourable for their cases. At this point arbitrators cannot compel parties/non-parties since they lack the authority to compel them to produce evidence. However, there are alternative means which enables arbitrators to obtain evidence from non-cooperative parties. This study will first examine the sources of arbitrators' powers in terms of evidence taking. In this regard, statutory laws of France and US and set of rules, which supplements evidence taking process, will be examined. Next, means of taking evidence will be presented. At this point, evidence taking procedures of French and US laws and their efficiencies will be compared. Each national law provides certain advantages and drawbacks in different aspects. Therefore, depending on the circumstances, either French or US law may provide a more efficient way of taking evidence. At the end of each section, by adopting socio-legal methodology, impacts of evidence taking methods will be discussed. It will be argued that, depending on the scenario, some evidence taking methods might be more useful than others.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Ceza muhakemesinde delillerin toplanması

    Obtaining evidence in Turkish criminal procedure law

    VEYSEL DİNLER

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    Adli TıpPolis Akademisi

    Suç Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. VAHİT BIÇAK

  2. Nemo tenetur ilkesi bağlamında beden muayenesi ve vücuttan örnek alınması

    Physical examination and taking samples from body in the context of nemo tenetur principle (principle of not to be compelled self-incrimination)

    ÇİĞDEM ADAR ÖZDEMİR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Hukukİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SERDAR TALAS

  3. Beden muayenesi ve vücuttan örnek alma suretiyle elde edilen delillerin ispat değeri

    Evidentiary value of pieces of evidence gathered through the physical examination of the body and through body samples

    FULYA EROĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    HukukYeditepe Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. YENER ÜNVER

  4. Bulut depolama uygulamalarını kullanan bilgisayarların adli bilişim açısından incelenmesi

    The examination of computers that use the applications of cloud storage in terms of computer forensics

    İSMAİL BARBAROS

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2016

    Adli Tıpİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Fen Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. EMEL HÜLYA YÜKSELOĞLU

  5. Hukuka aykırı arama işlemi neticesinde elde edilen delillerin ceza muhakemesinde kullanılması

    Using the evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search in the criminal procedure

    MELİSA AYDEMİR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    HukukKadir Has Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ FULYA EROĞLU