Choice-of-court agreements under the brussels I regulation (Recast) and Turkish private international law
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 799820
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. WİLLİAM BİLL O’BRİAN JR.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Uluslararası Ticaret, International Trade
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2018
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Warwick
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 54
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
International commerce has great importance in the world. People who are dealing with commercial issues are establishing strong commercial relationships between each other. The parties to those commercial relationships are generally regulating their relations by making various contracts under the principle of freedom of contract. In those contracts, they are regulating both the substance of their relations and the resolution of the potential disputes which may arise out of their relations either by adding various clauses to their contracts or by making separate contracts. One of the most important issues which the parties decide – either by adding clauses to their contract or by making separate contract for it – regards to the court that will hear their dispute. This research paper will deal with choice-of-court agreements under the Brussels I Regulation (Recast) and Turkish private international law. One of the reasons why this research prefers to deal with these two legal systems is that both the European Union and Turkey are involving in significant international commercial relations both between each other and with other countries. Furthermore, Turkey is in the process of applying for European Union membership and therefore it is trying to make necessary arrangements (from legal, political and economic aspects) for this purpose. So, by examining the European Union and the Turkish legal systems, this research will reach a conclusion about which legal system is more beneficial for the parties and how they can be improved (if necessary) to minimize their drawbacks.
Benzer Tezler
- Regarding recognition and enforcement of judgements why did not hague convention succeeded as new york convention did on awards?
Başlık çevirisi yok
EZGİ EVRENSEL
- Anonim ortaklıklar hukukunda pay satış sözleşmeleri ekseninde satıcının beyan ve tekeffülleri
Representation and warranties of the seller within the scope of share purchase agreements under joint stock companies law
İSMAİL TÜRKYILMAZ
- Teori ve pratikte supranational Avrupa Topluluk Hukuku (yapısal ve operasyonel bir çalışma)
Başlık çevirisi yok
İRFAN PAÇACI
- 5718 sayılı Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk ve Usul Hukuku Hakkında Kanun'un 1. maddesi çerçevesinde yabancılık unsuru
Foreign element under the International Private and Civil Procedure Law No: 5718 art. 1
MERVE İLDAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
Hukukİstanbul Medipol ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. YÜCEL SAYMAN
