Geri Dön

Türk Hukukunda cezaların ve güvenlik önlemlerinin infazı ve hakimin infaza katılması

The Execution of punishments and security precautions in Turkish Law and the intervention of judge to execution

  1. Tez No: 117250
  2. Yazar: MEHMET UĞUR
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. METİN FEYZİOĞLU
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Kamu Yönetimi, Law, Public Administration
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2002
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Anadolu Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 371

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Ill ABSTRACT In general meaning of the word, execution is determined as to carry out. In Crime Law, execution is to carry out a criminal sentence or security precaution decision which became final. As it could be seen in the definition, to become final is needed for the execution. In other words, execution is impossible for the decision which did not become final. For the execution, the concept of punishment should also be enlighten. In general words, punishment is a sanction which ordered with a law and determined in a judicial decision. The punishment must have a disciplinary and preventive qualification. Only the person who has an ability for punishment can be punished. The aim of the execution is to provide the realization of general and private preventive function of the punishment. The general preventive function means to keep the uncriminal people away from the crimes. The basic aim of the punishment can also be defined as to frighten and to retrain people. In addition to these, as it is seen especially in the punishments restricting personal liberty, to discipline the prisoner is another aim of the execution. Although there can be different procedures for execution in capital punishments, punishments restricting personal liberty, fines, subsidiary and supplementary punishments and in security precautions, there are basic principles such as the principles of legality and continuousness of execution, to avoid of being secret in execution* huministic execution and the individiulaziation of execution. Without these principles the system of execution can not be contemporary.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Nefret söylemi kapsamında Halkı Kin ve Düşmanlığa Tahrik Suçu

    The Crime of Provoking The Public Hatred, hostility within the scope of hate speech

    SERRA KARADENİZ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2012

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. VESİLE SONAY EVİK

  2. Türkiye'de su hakkı

    The right to water in Turkey

    YILDIZ AKEL ÜNAL

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ERDOĞAN BÜLBÜL

  3. Türk iş hukukunda iş kazası ve işvereni sorumluluğu

    Work accident and employer liability in Turkish labor law

    HAKAN ÖZKAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    HukukYeditepe Üniversitesi

    Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ REFİK CEM DİNAR

  4. Türk hukukunda iş sağlığı ve güvenliği yaptırımları

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    ALİ EKİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    HukukSelçuk Üniversitesi

    Özel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. HALUK HADİ SÜMER

  5. Türk hukukunda hapis cezalarının infazında kanunilik ilkesi

    The principle of legality in Turkish law on the execution of criminal sentences

    AHMET NECİP ARSLAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    Hukukİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SERDAR TALAS