Geri Dön

El fleksör tendon yaralanmalarında rehabilitasyon sonuçları

Rehabilitation outcome of flexor tendon injuries

  1. Tez No: 171889
  2. Yazar: YASEMİN SOYTÜRK ÖZSEREN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. NİHAL TAŞ
  4. Tez Türü: Tıpta Uzmanlık
  5. Konular: Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2006
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Gazi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Tıp Fakültesi
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 95

Özet

82 injuries and 45.9 % improvement in the hand which is zone V injuries. This is statistically significant (p

Özet (Çeviri)

81 SUMMARY Although the exact incidence is unknown, flexor tendon injuries are very common problems. Prolonged disability following such an injury can cause physical and emotional suffering and socioeconomic disaster fort he patient. Rehabilitation after tendon repair is of the utmost importance, because it often determines the final outcome. There is stil controversy with regard to the postoperative management of flexor tendon injuries. However, recent evidence suggests that early mobilization produces better results. în this prospective study, results of 48 flexor tendon repairs in 21 patients rehabilitated in Gazi University, Medical Faculty Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation are analyzed. Postopertively patients were managed by Kleinert' controlled active extansion with rubbber band flexion technique. Pre and post treatment, it was measured finger range of motion, distance between the finger tip and distal palmar crease, grip strength and pinch strength at the injured hand. Result were evaluated by using the both Stricland and Buck-Gramcko systems. According to Strickland formula of total active motion, 30 fingers (% 62.5) were rated 'excellent' and 'good'. According to Buck-Gramcko system 31 fingers (% 64.6) were rated 'excellent' and 'good'. The values of grip strength in zone V which contain nevre injury less than the values of grip strength in the zone II cases that does not include nevre injuries. According to the statistics it is not found meaningfull difference between these values( p>0.05). When it is compared distance between the finger tip and distal palmar crease in zone V and zone n, we see 66.8 % improvement in the hand that is zone II82 injuries and 45.9 % improvement in the hand which is zone V injuries. This is statistically significant (p

Benzer Tezler

  1. Elin fleksör tendon yaralanmalarında rehabilitasyon sonuçları

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    SAMİ KÜÇÜKŞEN

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Fiziksel Tıp ve RehabilitasyonSelçuk Üniversitesi

    Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. HATİCE UĞURLU

  2. I-III. bölge fleksör tendon yaralanmalarında elektromiyografik (:EMG) biofeedback eğitiminin elektriksel kas aktivitesi ve fonksiyonel duruma etkisi

    The effect of electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training on electrical muscle activity and functional status in zone I-III flexor tendon injuries

    UMUT ERASLAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Fizyoterapi ve RehabilitasyonPamukkale Üniversitesi

    Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ALİ KİTİŞ

    PROF. DR. AHMET FAHİR DEMİRKAN

  3. El fleksör tendon yaralanmalarında rehabilitasyon

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    TEZGÜL SEZER

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2000

    Fiziksel Tıp ve RehabilitasyonEge Üniversitesi

    Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SİMİN HEPGÜLER

  4. El bileği ve parmak fleksör tendon yaralanmalarından sonra uygulanan farklı rehabilitasyon yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    HASAN HALLAÇELİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1992

    Fiziksel Tıp ve RehabilitasyonHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. SAADET OTMAN