Geri Dön

Baş boyun radyoterapisinde lineer hızlandırıcıda asimetrik kolimasyonlu tek izomerkezli tedavi tekniği ile kobalt-60 ve lineer hızlandırıcıda normal kolimasyonlu iki izomerkezli tedavi tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of asymmetric collimated monoisocentric treatment technique of linac with symmetric collimated double isocentre treatment technique of CO-60 and linac units in head and neck radiotherapy

  1. Tez No: 193266
  2. Yazar: MELTEM ATAMEL
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. FERAH YILDIZ
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Fizik ve Fizik Mühendisliği, Physics and Physics Engineering
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Head and neck irradiation, asymmetric collimation, thermoluminance dosimetry, diode in-vivo dosimetry
  7. Yıl: 2006
  8. Dil: Türkçe
  9. Üniversite: Hacettepe Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Radyasyon Onkolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

ÖZET$7$0(/ 0 %Dú ER\XQ UDG\RWHUDSLVLQGH /LQHHU KÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕGD DVLPHWULNve LineerNROLPDV\RQOX WHN L]RPHUNH]OL WHGDYL WHNQL÷L LOH .REDOW-60KÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕGD QRUPDO NROLPDV\RQOX LNL L]RPHUNH]OL WHGDYL WHNQLNOHULQLQNDUúÕODúWÕUÕOPDVÕ+DFHWWHSHhQLYHUVLWHVL6D÷OÕN%LOLPOHUL(QVWLWV5DG\RWHUDSLFizL÷L 3URJUDPÕ <NVHN /LVDQV 7H]L $QNDUD %X oDOÕúPDGD EDú ER\XQNDQVHUOHULQGH ER\XQ YH 6&) ÕúÕQODPDODUÕQGD DODQ NHVLúPH E|OJHVLQGH ROXúDQ GR]GD÷ÕOÕPODUÕ WHN L]RPHUNH]OL WHGDYL WHNQL÷L YH LNL L]RPHUNH]OL WHGDYL WHNQL÷LNXOODQDUDN NDUúÕODúWÕUÕOPÕúWÕU 7HN L]RPHUNH]OL WHGDYL WHNQL÷L /LQHHU KÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕFLKD]ÕQGD DVLPHWULN NROLPDW|U NXOODQDUDN LNL L]RPHUNH]OL WHGDYL WHNQL÷L /LQHHUKÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕ YH .REDOW- FLKD]ODUÕQGD VLPHWULN NROLPDW|U NXOODQDUDN LQFHOHQPLúWLUøNLL]RPHUNH]OLWHGDYLWHNQL÷LVLPHWULNDODQWHNQL÷LYHDoÕOÕDODQWHNQL÷LROPDN]HUHLNL D\UÕ E|OPGH LQFHOHQPLúWLU 6LPHWULN DODQ WHNQL÷LQGH ER\XQ DODQÕ YHGHUHFHJDQWU\DoÕODUÕQGD6&)DODQÕGHUHFHJDQWU\DoÕVÕQGDÕúÕQODQPÕúWÕU$oÕOÕDODQWHNQL÷LQGH ER\XQ DODQÕQGD ÕúÕQ GLYHUMDQVÕQÕ \RN HGHFHN úHNLOGH PDVD\D DoÕYHULOPLúWLU 6&) DODQÕQGD LVH |QFH PDVD\D GHUHFH DoÕ YHULOPLú VRQUD ÕúÕQGLYHUMDQVÕQÕ \RN HGHFHN úHNLOGH JDQWU\ DoÕVÕ YHULOPLúWLU $ODQ NHVLúLP E|OJHVLQGHNLsistemiGR] GD÷ÕOÕPODUÕ $OGHUVRQ 5DQGR IDQWRPGD %LOJLVD\DU WHGDYL SODQlamaSimetrik alanNXOODQÕODUDN KHVDSODQPÕú 7/' YH GL\RW NXOODQÕODUDN |OoOPúWUWHNQL÷LQGH /LQHHU KÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕGD PDNVLPXP ¶ OLN GR] QRNWDODUÕ .REDOW-60FLKD]ÕQGD PDNVLPXP ¶ OXN GR] QRNWDODUÕ VDSWDQPÕúWÕU $VLPHWULN DODQWHNQL÷LQGH LVH /LQHHU KÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕ FLKD]Õ LoLQ HQ ID]OD ¶ OLN VÕFDN QRNWDEXOXQPXúWXU $oÕOÕ DODQ WHNQL÷LQGH /LQHHU KÕ]ODQGÕUÕFÕ YH .REDOW- FLKD]ODUÕ LoLQHOGH HGLOHQ YHULOHUGH HQ ID]OD ¶ OXN VÕFDN QRNWD EXOXQPDNWDGÕU (OGH HGLOHQsonuçlarda simetrik alan teknL÷LQGH ÕúÕQ GLYHUMDQVÕQGDQ GROD\Õ DODQ NHVLúPHE|OJHVLQGH LVWHQPH\HQ VÕFDN QRNWDODU ROXúPDNWDGÕU )DNDW DoÕOÕ DODQ WHNQL÷L YHDVLPHWULN DODQ WHNQL÷L NXOODQÕODUDN EX VÕFDN QRNWDODU D]DOWÕOPÕúWÕU %X QHGHQOH LGHDO\DNODúÕPDVLPHWULNDODQWHNQL÷LGLU %XWHNQL÷LQ PPNQROPDGÕ÷ÕPHUNH]OHUGHDoÕOÕDODQWHNQL÷LL\LELUDOWHUQDWLIWLU'R]KRPRMHQLWHVLDoÕVÕQGDQLQFHOHQGL÷LQGHDVLPHWULNDODQ WHNQL÷LQGH DoÕOÕ DODQ WHNQL÷LQH J|UH GDKD KRPRMHQ ELU GR] GD÷ÕOÕPÕ HOGHHGLOPLúWLUasimetrik kolimasyon,$QDKWDU .HOLPHOHU %Dú ER\XQ ÕúÕQODPDVÕTermolüminesans Dozimetri (7/''L\RWøQ-vivo Dozimetrisi

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACTATAMEL, M. Comparison of asymmetric collimated monoisocentric treatmenttechnique of Linac with symmetric collimated double isocentre treatmenttechnique of Co-60 and Linac units in head and neck radiotherapy, HacettepeUniversty, Radiotherapy Physics Master program thesis of Medical SciencesInstitute, Ankara, 2006. In this study, the dose distributions at the junction zone ofbilateral neck and SCF irradiation were compared with monoisocentric and doubleisocentric treatment technique. Monoisocentric treatment technique was investigatedby using asymmetric collimation in Linear Accelerator. Double isocentric treatmenttechnique was investigated by using symmetric collimation in Linac and Co-60teletherapy units. Double isocentric technique was examined by symmetric field andangled field techniques. In symmetric field technique neck field was irradiated at 90and 270 degree of gantry angles, SCF field was irradiated at 0 degree of gantryangle. In angled-field technique neck field was rotated until radiation divergence wasannihilated rotation an at SCF field, couch was rotated to 90 degree angle withgantry till radiation was annihilated. Dose distributions at junction zone ofAlderson randophantom were evaluated by using computer planning tratment systemand measured by using TLD and diode equipments. In symmetric field technique ledto max 125% dose point for linac and max 130% dose point for Co-60 unit. Inasymmetric field technique on the other hand maximum 107% dose points werefound. In angled-field technique it was 109%. BTPS showed that asymmetric fieldtechnique had more homogenious dose distribution when compared to symmetricangled field technique.As a conclusion symmetric field technique leads to unwanting hot spots in head andneck cancer treatment. Asymmetric field technique seems to be the best solution inorder to eliminate this problem. However when this technique is not available,angled field technique offers a good alternative.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Baş ve boyun radyoterapisinde konvansiyonel ve asimetrik ortogonal planlamalarda larinks dozlarının karşılaştırılması.

    Comparsion doses to the larynx conventional and asymmetric orthogonal planning in head and neck radiotherapy.

    ERHAN DİŞÇİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2008

    Onkolojiİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Temel Onkoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. İSMAİL ÖZBAY

  2. Baş boyun radyoterapisinde, lineer hızlandırıcıda kritik organ dozlarının tedavi planlama sistemiyle karşılaştırılması

    In head and neck radiotherapy comparison of critical organ doses of linear accelerator with treatment planning system

    MERVE ERGÜN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2012

    Fizik ve Fizik MühendisliğiSelçuk Üniversitesi

    Nükleer Fizik Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. NURETDİN EREN

  3. Kuyruk modelleri ve analizi üzerine bir uygulama

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    DİDEM ÖZPULAT

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1985

    İstatistikEge Üniversitesi

    Bilgisayar Bilimleri ve Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. FİKRET İKİZ

  4. Gelişim nörolojisi polikliniğine başvuran nöral tüp defektli olgularda prospektif bir inceleme

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    İLKBAHAR EMİNE GÜLTEKİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1986

    Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıklarıİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Aile Sağlığı Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. SELÇUK APAK

  5. Samsun ve çevresinde tarla sarmaşığı (conuolvulus arvensis L.)'na karşı biyolojik savaşa esas olacak fauna tespiti

    Investigations on the insect fauna of the field binweed (Conuolvulus arvensis L.) related to its biological control in Samsun Province

    YASEMİN UFUK GERMAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1985

    BotanikEge Üniversitesi

    Bitki Koruma Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NİYAZİ LODOS