Geri Dön

From court history recorder to an official historical writing society in Turkey: The case of the Ottoman Historical Society

Saray tarihçisinden resmi tarih kurumuna: Tarih-i Osmani Enctümeni

  1. Tez No: 364305
  2. Yazar: HASAN AKBAYRAK
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. ZAFER TOPRAK
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Tarih, History
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1987
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Tarih Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 208

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Tradi tional Ottoman historical writing maintained __ its general features without any significant changes up to the second part of the nineteenth century. This period of ottoman historical writing was dominated by the recording of the official Ottoman state chronicles. From the nineteenth century on, traditonal Ottoman historical writing was affected by European historiography. Yet, though historical writing extended its areas of interest and started to include new branches of history, it still did not exhibit a significant development of historical methodology. However, the most important result of western influence on ottoman historical writing was the beginning of the national approach toward history. The Second Constitutional period did not receive any heritage of modern historical writing from the nineteenth century. After the proclamation of the Constitution, the activities in the field of history consisted of the publications of translated books and publishing articles about history in newspapers and magazines. This situation was due to the expansion of history courses in schools and the abolishment of censorship from press and publications after the proclamation of the Second Constitution. On the other hand, the vakantivis institution of traditional Ottoman historical writing continued to record the events of Ottoman history during the period, too. Just after the accession of Sultan Mehmed Re§ad,to the throne in May 1909, Abdurrahman $eref was appointed as the official history recorder (vakallltivis). The interest of :the new Sultan in history coincided with the general conviction that the Ottoman state can maintain her existence as a multi-national empire. Thus, the writing of a new ottoman history in conformity to this conviction became important. Under the Circumstances, the Ottoman Historical SOCiety (Tarih-i Osman1 Enctimeni) was founded with Abdurrahman ~eref as president, in November 1909. The SOCiety planned to first write the comprehensive history of the ottoman state. In addition, it would publish the documents and the manuscripts of Ottoman histories and pamphlets. The SOCiety first issued a journal publishing the documents and articles on ottoman history. Only the first volume of the planned work on Ottoman History which covered the history of pre-Ottoman Turks rather than the Ottomans themselves, could be written and published in 1917. Furthermore, the SOCiety worked on the classification of the Ottoman archives with the collaboration of the vaka~ntivis institution. Moreover, the Society tried to collect the sourCes of Ottoman history. The SOCiety also published the manuscripts of major ottoman histories and pamphlets separately as an appendix of its journal. In addition, after 1916 it started to publish some monographs on ottoman history. The Society stopped its activities during the Armistice period. After the Republic, the Society took the name of Turkish Historical Society (Türk Tarih Enctimeni) and continued its activities, except the writing of ottoman History. The Society was re-founded and put under the con trol of the Ministry of Education by the government of Ankara in 1927. On the other hand, it did not play an effective role in the activities of the cultural reform programmes of the Republican Administration. As a result, the new institution of the Republic, TUrk Tarih Kurumu (the Turkish Historical Society) replaced the Society in 1930.

Benzer Tezler

  1. XVIII. yüzyılda Osmanlı sosyal tarihine katkı; Konya 60 No'lu Şer'iyye Sicili'nin analizi ve tarihsel bilgi kaynağı olarak kullanımına ilişkin bir yöntem denemesi

    The Contribution to ottoman social history in XVIII th century; the analysis of Konya's 60 numbered sher'iye sicil and a methodical try to the usability relating to historical knowledge source

    ÖZLEM BAŞARIR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2003

    TarihAnkara Üniversitesi

    Tarih Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ÖZER ERGENÇ

  2. Tarihi Türk bahçeleri: İstanbul örneği

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    RANA FATMA AYDIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1993

    Peyzaj Mimarlığıİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AHMET C. YILDIZCI

  3. The functioning of the administrative judiciary in the province of Damascus within the framework of a 1549 Mehâyif Inspection Register

    1549 Mehayif Teftiş Defteri çerçevesinde Şam vilayetinde idârî yargının işleyişi

    ŞULE AKSU

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2024

    Tarihİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası Osmanlı Çalışmaları Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. GÜNEŞ IŞIKSEL

  4. 19.yüzyıl mimarlığı içinde Dolmabahçe Sarayı'nın yeri

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    DEMET COŞANSEL

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1991

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF. DR. METİN SÖZEN

  5. Kara avcılığında yasakların çiğnenmesi

    Violations of hunting prohibitions

    SİNAN ÇAYA

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2010

    Sosyolojiİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Sosyal Bilimler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. M. YAŞAR İŞCAN