Geri Dön

The critical assessment of the direct referentialist solutions to the semantic problems of empty names

Doğrudan göndergeciliğin 'boş' isimlerdeki semantik problemlere çözümlerinin eleştirisi

  1. Tez No: 399451
  2. Yazar: MUSTAFA POLAT
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. ALİYE KARANFİL SOYHUN
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2013
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 69

Özet

Doğrudan Göndergeci teoriye göre,özel adların biricik semantik anlamı ya da değeri ismin göndergesinden başka bir şey değildir eğer ki bu isim herhangi bir şeye gönderimde bulunuyorsa. Dolayısı ile göndergesiz,“boş”isimler bu teoriye göre anlamsızdır. Cümlenin anlamı olan önermenin, cümlenin parçalarının anlamından ibaret bir fonksiyon olarak alırsak;Doğrudan Göndergecilik, boş isimlerle kurulmuş cümlelerin anlamsız olduğunu söyler. Ancak bu durum genel kanıya ters bir sonuçtur, boş isim cümleleri,“Noel Baba yoktur”, bizim dilsel sezgilerimizde anlamlıdır. Bu tezde, Doğrudan Göndergecilerin açıklaması gereken bu sorunsalı ileri boyutlarıyla incelemekteyim.

Özet (Çeviri)

According to Direct Referentialist account of proper names, the sole semantic meaning of a proper name is its referent if and only if it has any. On the semantic function of a proper name within a sentence, it is further endorsed by the principle of semantic compositionality that a proposition expressed by a sentence is a function of the semantic meanings of the sentence?s constituents1. Holding the semantic compositionality, Direct Referentialist account entails the conclusion that a proper name in a sentence can be used to express a proposition if and only if it has a referent, namely a semantic meaning. Thus, for Direct Referentialist account (hereafter, DR), a referring proper name such as ?Aristotle? can be used to express a proposition to which the name contributes only its referent. In other words, a well-formed declarative sentence employing a referring proper name expresses a proposition if the other sentential constituents are meaningful as well. Thus, DR maintains that the sentence ?Aristotle is a philosopher?, for instance, expresses the proposition identified by the ordered pair < Aristotle, being a philosopher> at where the semantic meaning of the name ?Aristotle? is nothing but the individual man himself. Nonetheless, some proper names (e.g. Santa Claus, Sherlock Holmes, and Vulcan) are empty from an actual or an extensional referent and thereby these names are non-referring proper names when they are taken to speak of actual individuals involving in states of affairs in actuality. In the case of such non-referring proper names, DR therefore implies that an empty name has no semantic meaning to use to express a proposition. That is to say, sentences employing an empty name, i.e. empty-name sentences2, fail to express a proposition, namely a complete semantic function. For most of DR theorists, the empty-name sentence ?Santa Claus is jolly?, for instance, expresses an incomplete semantic function that could be represented by the ?gappy? proposition at where the argument slot designated for the semantic meaning of the name ?Santa? remains unfilled3. Furthermore, it is conventionally accepted in truth-conditional semantics that a proposition posits the meaningful and truth-evaluable content expressed by a sentence. If it is the case, and empty-name sentences fail to express a proposition, then DR entails the two further conclusions: (1) Empty-name sentences fail to express something meaningful and (2) Empty-name sentences fail to express something truth-evaluable. The above conclusions driven by DR are confronted with some apparent challenges by our linguistic intuitions about the semantics of what is said by an empty-name sentence. In a word, these conclusions do not jibe with our common semantic and truth-theoretical intuitions about empty-name sentences. Firstly, as our semantic intuitions suggest in most cases, empty-name sentences such as ?Vulcan is the tenth planet?4, ?Santa Claus doesn?t exist? make sense and this implies that empty-name sentences, unlike DR predicts, say something meaningful. Hence, it further implies that an empty-name sentence expresses a proposition. Respectively, I call this complication as the Problem of Meaningfulness (hereafter, PM). Secondly, it also appears that competent speakers judge empty-name sentences to be truth-evaluable in most cases. The sentence ?Santa Claus doesn?t exist?, for instance, seems to be true for our truth-theoretical intuitions once we have an informed reflection that there is no such a thing in discourse about actuality. In contrast to the Direct Referentialist conclusion, this seeming truth-evaluability of empty-name sentences implies that these sentences say something truth-evaluable. Again, it further implies that an empty-name sentence expresses a proposition. Throughout the paper, I dub this second complication as the Problem of Truth-Evaluability (hereafter PT).

Benzer Tezler

  1. Masif rotator manşet yırtığı hastalarında psödoparezi, psödoparalizi kavramları ve radyolojik değerlendirmeleri

    Pseudoparesis and pseudoparalysis concepts and radiological evaluations in patients with massive rotator cuff tears

    SEMİH YAŞ

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    Ortopedi ve TravmatolojiGazi Üniversitesi

    Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. MUHAMMET BAYBARS ATAOĞLU

  2. İklim değişikliğine uyumda yeşil sertifikasyonların yeri: Kırklareli -TOKİ örneği üzerinden bir değerlendirme

    The place of green certification in adaptation to climate change: an evaluation on Kırklareli -TOKİ example

    BÜŞRA BEGEN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ÖZLEM ÖZÇEVİK

  3. Kalitatif çapraz etki analizinde etkileşimi ve belirsizliği dikkate alan yeni bir yaklaşım

    A new approach to qualitative cross impact analysis considering the interaction effects and uncertainty

    ÇİĞDEM KADAİFÇİ

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2017

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. UMUT ASAN

  4. Ekosistem servisleri değerinin mekânsal planlama ile ilişkilendirilmesi

    Integration of ecosystem services value into spatial planning

    NÜKET İPEK ÇETİN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AZİME TEZER

  5. Duisburg Nachlass Refleksiyonları'nın Kant'ın felsefesi çerçevesinde tahlili

    An analysis of the Duisburg Nachlass Reflexions within the framework of Kant's philosophy

    TURAL ABBASOV

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    FelsefeAnkara Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. IŞIL BAYAR BRAVO