Multicultural citizenship in a liberal society
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 400426
- Danışmanlar: PROF. PAUL GILBERT
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Siyasal Bilimler, Political Science
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2002
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: The University of Hull
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 264
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
In this chapter, our aim was not to suggest a principle that could be applied to all kinds of disputed minority practices, for there is no such a principle. The extent of accommodating such practices should therefore be determined by the kinds of moral, political and cultural values and preferences that the relevant parties hold. However, accepting that disputed minority practices should be assessed according to the specific circumstances in which they 79 Galeotti, `Citizenship and equality?, p. 601.arise does not mean that some practices cannot be rejected by appealing to some universally recognised human interests and rights. Since they are fundamental conditions for individual well being, they should be regarded as culturally neutral values. The rights to be granted to a minority cultural group would therefore have to be compatible with them. In this sense, while the right to culture is a significant human interest, it should be constrained by other fundamental human interests and rights.On the other hand, there are some minority practices and values that cannot be assessed by appealing to human rights. We tried to maintain two positions to be held in assessing such minority practices that are seen offensive to the values with which a liberal society identifies itself. First, a liberal society is, we argued, culturally specific, has a particular moral understanding, and common established way of life, even if it is not shared by its all constitutive groups. It cannot therefore have equal sympathy towards all minority practices. Secondly, that a liberal society, as a cultural community, cannot have equal sympathy towards all minority practices does not mean that it should regard its liberal values as authoritative over non- liberal minority groups. That is, liberals may rightly identify their preferences to these groups, but liberal states should not impose these preferences on them. Since no established way of life is absolute, and thus subject to reassessment and criticism, accommodation of some minority practices may require liberal societies to revise and change some rules and regulations to enable these groups to live in accordance with their cultural and religious nexus to the extent that these practices do not undermine the basic stability of the liberal democratic regime. 243All these arguments point out the necessity of a democratic public dialogue in which the relevant parties should engage, though we do not have adequate space here to explain the notion adequately. That is, there should be an open-minded public dialogue between them, and arrive at mutually acceptable principles. There is no governing principle that can be suggested as to what the scope and degree of such a mutual agreement or compromise should be like. Yet, they should take two significant assumptions as the starting point of the dialogue; namely, the constituent groups of a multicultural society have obligations both to each other and to their individual members. In this sense, they have two obligations. First, each distinctive cultural and religious group has a valid claim to maintain their own distinctive cultural and religious existences, and thus they should respect the distinctive otherness of each other. Second, no matter how genuine a cultural or religious practice is, no group can, in the name of culture and religion, have a valid claim to dismiss, oppress or violate the human rights of their individual members. Given that fundamental human rights should not be considered as rights associated only with liberalism, but as rights that belongs to all human beings, all relevant parties then should morally take them very seriously in their treatment of their members.
Benzer Tezler
- 1989' dan 2009 yılına Kürt sorununa ilişkin kamuoyuna sunulan rapor ve açılımların çokkültürlülük literatürü kapsamında değerlendirilmesi
Analysing the reports and expansions, which are declared to public between 1989-2009, about Kurdish question within context of multiculturalism
TANZER ÇELİKTÜRK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2011
Siyasal BilimlerPamukkale ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. H. ALİYAR DEMİRCİ
- Framing rights-claims: Collective identity groups in the Turkish Public sphere
Başlık çevirisi yok
BİHTER TÖMEN
- Modern yurttaşlık ve çokkültürlülük Habermas'ın çözüm önerisi: Anayasal yurtseverlik
Modern citizenship and multiculturalism Habermas's solution proposal: Constitutional patriotism
UĞUR AZİZOĞLU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
Siyasal BilimlerAnkara ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ÖMER AYKUT ÇELEBİ
- Küreselleşme sürecinde vatandaşlık ve din
Citizenship and religion in the globalization process
ÖZLEM ÜLKER SHAHAVATOV
- Avrupa'da dinsel farklılık ve John Rawls'ın siyasal liberalizmi
Religious diversity in europe and John Rawls' political liberalism
HÜSEYİN ŞİMŞEK
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
Siyasal BilimlerAbant İzzet Baysal ÜniversitesiKamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. FATMA TÜTÜNCÜ
