Geri Dön

Plato's defence of justices Socrates contra Nietzsche

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 401159
  2. Yazar: SANDRINE BERGES
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. CHRIS MEGONE
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Felsefe, Philosophy
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1999
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: University of Leeds
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 194

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

In the Crito, Socrates' refusal to escape from his death sentence is based on a certain account of what justice requires, distinct from the view that he owes unconditional obedience to the laws. This position is defended by Plato in later dialogues. The resulting account has famously been supposed to be one of the main targets of Nietzsche's critique of morality. I argue that on a proper understanding of the account of justice proposed in the Crito, and of Nietzsche's critique, it is not the case that Nietzsche rejects Socrates' position. In Part One I offer a novel interpretation of the Crito, and show how the assertions made in that dialogue are defended later by Plato. Socrates, I argue, refuses to escape because by doing so he would injure his fellow citizens, and thereby risk developing character traits which would eventually threaten to ruin his psychic health, but also, he would have to give up philosophy which is essential for producing and maintaining psychic health. In Part Two, I show that Nietzsche's critique is not targetted at Plato's account of justice thus understood, but that the positions of the two philosophers regarding the just life are in fact very close. In particular, I argue that the apparent resemblance between Nietzsche and Callicles vanishes when we look at their very different conceptions of power and the human good. I argue also that, contrary to traditional views of Nietzsche, he is not an anti-rationalist, and thus does not oppose Plato's view that reason plays an important role in the good life. Lastly, I compare Nietzsche' s concept of self-overcoming and Plato's psychic harmony, and show that the two resemble each other closely. I conclude that there is no substance to the claim that Nietzsche rejects Plato's account of justice, when this account is understood as an elaboration of the view put forward in the Crito.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Nietzsche'nin Sokrates hakkındaki düşünceleri bağlamında 'Sokrates problemi'ne bakış

    An approach to 'Problem of Socrates' through the context of Nietzsche's thoughts about Socrates

    EBRU AYDIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2016

    FelsefeHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Felsefe Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. CEMAL GÜZEL

  2. A metaphilosophical reading of Plato's Phaedo

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    TONGUÇ SEFEROĞLU

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2018

    FelsefeKing's College London

    Dr. JOACHIM AUFDERHEIDE

    Prof. RAPHAEL WOOLF

  3. Çeviri sürecine yorumbilimsel yaklaşımlar: Çeviribilimde yeni yorumbilimsel paradigma

    Hermeneutical approaches to translation process: The new hermeneutical paradigm in translation studies

    AYLA AKIN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2016

    Mütercim-TercümanlıkSakarya Üniversitesi

    Çeviribilim Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MUHARREM TOSUN

  4. Rönesans Devri bahçe sanatı ve ülkemizdeki yansıması olarak Beylerbeyi Sarayı ve set bahçeleri

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    AHSEN TAŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1998

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehircilik Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. NİLGÜN ERGUN

  5. Yuvarlama sarma yöntemi ile üretilen karbon fiber borularda fiber yönünün dayanıma etkisi

    The effect of fibre direction of on the strength of the carbon fibre pipes manufactured via roll wrapping method

    AKİF KABAKÇI

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    Makine MühendisliğiDüzce Üniversitesi

    Makine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MERT KILINÇEL