Geri Dön

Inner‐city regeneration and the politics of resistance in Istanbul: A comparative analysis of Sulukule and Tarlabaşi

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 402364
  2. Yazar: ÖZLEM ÜNSAL
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. FRANK WEBSTER, DR. PATRIA ROMAN VELAZQUEZ
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Sosyoloji, Sociology
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2013
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: City University London
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 265

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Territories of neoliberal urbanization have expanded as local and central governments around the world have increasingly approached and utilized urban land as a rent--‐generating tool that can as well reproduce the workings of advanced capitalism in full effect. It has thus been inevitable to see the expansion of the territories of urban oppositional movements in direct proportion to the globalization of neoliberal urbanism. Currently, civil, supranational and grassroots organizations are actively raising critical questions with respect to the diminishing chances of citizens to access affordable housing, public spaces, natural reserves, urban resources and services, participatory decision--‐making mechanisms at the level of local governance etc. Departing from here, what is being witnessed is the reintroduction of debates on the 'rights to the city' as coined by Henri Lefebvre (1968) and further tackled by David Harvey (2008) to the agenda of contentious urban politics. However, although there is growing literature on the skillful battles of oppositional movements against the forces of capital in various cities of the world, challenges encountered by movements, or the fragilities and vulnerabilities they might experience remain relatively understudied. This poses a matter of concern regarding that it can only be through the acknowledgement and transfer of knowledge emanating from battles against such challenges and vulnerabilities that learning processes can be enhanced and more sustainable movements can be built for the future. Istanbul's experience is not divorced from any of these developments and thus falls into the coverage of these territories of neoliberal globalization and urban contestation along the given lines. State--‐led urban transformation projects targeting informal housing zones, inner--‐city poverty areas, coastlines, large tracts of state owned, and natural and historic reserves, and oppositional views raised against these novel expressions of urban development by diverse civil initiatives can all be interpreted as narratives that reveal the contingency of Istanbul within the given territories. Yet, just as similar to the international context, the Turkish experience has not so far tackled the question of challenges to movement building in the face of such immense pressures as much as needed. The cases of Sulukule and Tarlabaşı, however, are highly revealing of the fact that it is incredibly difficult for socio--‐economically disadvantaged communities to sustain their mode of mobilized resistance against forces of urban transformation since the given forces instigate imminent divides within communities based on the will to access certain securities and gains. That is, although collective resistance and opposition to urban transformation may emanate from poverty zones, a tendecy to settle for material securities and gains may also emerge depending on the individually defined capacities of residents as the fear of loss in the battle against transformation climbs. Private ownership and its impact on grassroots mobilization deserves particular attention within the given set of constellations.

Benzer Tezler

  1. A comparative study in urban regeneration process: The case of Istanbul

    Kentsel yeniden üretim süreci üzerine karşılaştırmalı çalışma: İstanbul örneği

    EBRU GÜRLER

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2002

    Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    DOÇ. DR. ÇAĞATAY KESKİNOK

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. ASUMAN ERENDİL

  2. Tarlabaşı kentsel dönüşüm projesinin sanatçı çalışmaları üzerinden değerlendirilmesi

    Evalution of the Tarlabasi urban transformation project on artist work

    PELİN DOĞRUCAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2016

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. İPEK AKPINAR

  3. Kent merkezlerindeki konut alanlarında çöküntüleşme ve dönüşüm Bursa Doğanbey Kentsel Dönüşüm Projesi örneği

    Deprivation and regeneration in housing areas of the inner city Bursa Doğanbey Urban Regeneration Project

    ASLIHAN UYAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2008

    Şehircilik ve Bölge PlanlamaGazi Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    YRD. DOÇ. DR. ÖZLEM GÜZEY

  4. Ankara Garı-Ankara Kalesi aksı örneğinde özgün kent dokusuna yönelik kentsel yenileme çalışmasının peyzaj mimarlığı açısından irdelenmesi

    From the view of landscape architecture discussion of urban regeneration in accordance with original urban structure in the case of Ankara Central Station-Ankara Castle axle

    YELİZ YALÇIN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2006

    Peyzaj MimarlığıAnkara Üniversitesi

    Peyzaj Mimarlığı Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. EMİN BARIŞ

  5. İstanbul kent merkezi yakın çevresindeki konut alanlarındaki üniversite kampüslerinin sosyal ve fiziksel çevrenin canlandırılmasındaki etkileri

    The influences of university neighborhoods on regeneration of the social and physical environment

    BAŞAK ÇETİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2005

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    DOÇ.DR. NİLGÜN ERGUN