An analysis of Muslim commentators on the death of Jesus
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 402812
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Din, Religion
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Jesus, Death and Second Coming, the Qur'an, Mufassirs
- Yıl: 2011
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıty Of London - Heythrop College
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Each Abrahamic faith has an account of Jesus' crucifixion and death. While the Jews considered Jesus as heretical thus they thought that he deserved to die and they succeeded to crucify him, for the Christians, Jesus is the Son of God and it was an eternal plan of God to let Jesus to die on the cross for the sake of the sins of all human kind. However, as for the Muslims, Jesus is the prophet and the word of God, the Jews intended to crucify and kill Jesus, but they did not succeed since God has raised Jesus up (4:157). As a consequence, the Muslims view of Jesus' crucifixion and death contradict with both the Jews and Christians view. The Qur'an refers to the crucifixion and death of Jesus in a few verses. However, there have been massive studies on this issue in the Islamic tradition. On the one hand, Jesus' story had been taken into consideration in the“tales of the prophets”, on the other hand, the Sufi and Shi'i Muslims had an account of Jesus. Additionally, Hadith tradition has shaped Muslim understanding of Jesus' story. Finally, the commentators of the Qur'an have placed themselves into different positions in terms which source they used and how they interpreted the verses related to Jesus. It seems that understanding of Jesus in Islam is essentially based on not fully the Qur'an, but stories narrated by extra-Islamic sources. In the classical period of tafsir tradition, that kind of sources was not questioned, but in the modern period due to fundamental changes, these kinds of sources were not accepted, but actually their interpretation remains more or less the same with some exceptions.
Benzer Tezler
- İlk fıkhî tefsir ve müellifi Mukâtil b. Süleyman
Başlık çevirisi yok
MUSTAFA DEMİR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2010
DinCumhuriyet ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. HASAN KESKİN
- La problématique de l'espace et du temps dans l'écriture d'Assia Djebar et de Nedim Gürsel
Assia Djebar'ın ve Nedim Gürsel'in yazınında zaman ve mekan sorunsalı
CANSU GÜMÜŞTAŞ ŞEN
Yüksek Lisans
Fransızca
2014
Karşılaştırmalı EdebiyatGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFransız Dili ve Edebiyatı Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. SIDIKA SEZA YILANCIOĞLU
- Çörek otu hadisinin tahric ve tahlili
Verification and analysis of the hadith of black oil
FATİH VURMAZ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
DinDicle ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HACI MUSA BAĞCI
- Bakara Sûresi bağlamında Nafi', Ebu Âmr Âsım kıraatleri ve farklılıkları
Nâfi', Ebû 'Amr, 'Âsım qirats and their differences in the context of Sura Bakara
YAKUP TAŞ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
DinFırat ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MUSTAFA TAŞ
