Al-Ghazālī and Rasā'il Ikhwān al-Safā': Their influence on his thought
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 403382
- Danışmanlar: Prof. KHALED M. ABOU EL FADL
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Din, Religion
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2016
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıty Of Calıfornıa Los Angeles
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
In his Munqidh, al-Ghazālī states that there were four classes of seekers of truth at his time: the theologians, the followers of the doctrine of Ta'līm, the philosophers, and the Sufis. He depicts himself here as a Sufi who denounces the others, especially philosophy. This image of al-Ghazālī became the major perception of him from the beginning. But this perception changed completely in the twentieth century. The most recent scholarship challenges this image and views him as a kind of scholar who was heavily influenced by philosophy and disseminated its teachings in disguise. However, the concentration is given mostly to the philosophy of Ibn Sīnāwhile searching the source of this influence. While not denying the influence of Ibn Sīnā, this study argues that Rasā'il Ikhwān Ṣafā' must be taken iii seriously as a major source of philosophical influence on al-Ghazālī's thought despite the negative remarks he makes about them. It tries to prove its argument first by situating al-Ghazālī's negative remarks in the political and social conditions of his time and second by comparing his works, especially his Mishkāt al-Anwār, with Rasā'il. For its purpose, this study considers al-Ghazālī as a philosopher whose main concern was to direct the attention of his readers to their inner states and the behaviors resulting from them. This concern led him to search for and develop an ethical theology in which the theory of the soul and its purification played a role of utmost importance. The study shows that during his search, al-Ghazālī found the essential ingredients of this theology in the work of Ikhwān al-Ṣafā', gave it a new form, and put it on the market with a new name,“the Science of the Hereafter”('ilm al-akhirah) with its two subdivisions: the science of practice ('ilm al-mu'āmalah) and the science of unveiling ('ilm al-mukashafah).
Benzer Tezler
- Al-Ghazalı's account of causality and ıts ımplıcatıons to contemporary scıence and relıgıon dıscussıon
Al-Gazalinin kozalite anlayışı ve din-bilim tartışması
ÖZGÜR KOCA
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2011
FelsefeFatih ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ALPARSLAN AÇIKGENÇ
- Imam al-Ghazali's understanding of human ontology and behavior
Gazali'nin insan ontolojisi ve insan davranışına ilişkin anlayışı
CEMRE ATEŞÇİ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2019
Dinİbn Haldun ÜniversitesiMedeniyet Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. RECEP ŞENTÜRK
- A critical assessment of hume's and al-Ghazālī's views on critique of causation
Hume ve al-Ghazālī'nin nedensellik görüşlerinin kritik bir değerlendirmesi
ZAHRA KARANDISH
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2018
FelsefeBoğaziçi ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SUN DEMİRLİ
DR. NAZİF MUHTAROĞLU
- The holistic approach to knowledge and education in İmām Abū Hāmid Al-Ghazālī's system of thought
Imām Abū Hāmid Al-Ghazālı̄'nin düşünce sisteminde ilim ve eğitime bütünsel yaklaşım
AHSEN NİMET CEBECİ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2017
Felsefeİbn Haldun ÜniversitesiMedeniyet Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. RECEP ŞENTÜRK
- Seeking certitude: Iktisāb and Ilhām in imam al-Ghazālī's theory of knowledge
İmam Gazzâlî'nın bilgi teorisinde ilme giden iki yolu: İktisab ve ilham
SHEEBA ARIF
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2021
Felsefeİbn Haldun ÜniversitesiMedeniyet Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. RECEP ŞENTÜRK