Geri Dön

A Comparison of two progressive weight training methods on leg strength and anaerobic power of high school boys

Farklı iki tür arttırmalı ağırlık antreman metodunun liseli erkek öğrencilerin bacak kuvveti ve anaerobik gücü üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılması

  1. Tez No: 43230
  2. Yazar: BEKİR YÜKTAŞIR
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ.DR. FEHMİ TUNCEL, DOÇ.DR. KEMAL TAMER
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Spor, Sports
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Isotonic Training, Strength Training Vertical Jump, Anaerobic Power IV, Isotonic Training, Strength Training Vertical Jump, Anaerobic Power IV
  7. Yıl: 1995
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 46

Özet

ABSTRACT A COMPARISON OF TWO PRORESSIVE WEIGHT TRAINING METHODS ON LEG STRENGTH AND ANAEROBIC POWER OF HIGH SCHOOL BOYS YÜKTAŞIR Bekir M.S. in Physical Education Supervisor : Assoc.Prof. Dr.Fehmi TUNCEL Co-Supervisor : Assoc.Prof.Dr.Kemal Tamer July 1995 46 Pages The effect of eight weeks of multiple set progressive isotonic resistance (MSPIR) training and manual resistance (MR) training methods on the static and the dynamic leg strength and anaerobic power (vertical jump) were compared in forty seven high school boys aged 16-17 years. The subjects were classified into a control group (n=16), multiple set progressive isotonic resistance training group (n=16) and manual resistance group (n=15). Standardized field tests were used to measure the subject's performance. All measurements were accomplished within one week before and one week after traning. In applied procedure of multiple set progressive isotonic resistance (MSPIR) training method a barbell and free weights were used as a training equipment. Subjects exercised three sets of six repititions with a workload 80 - 85 % of one repitition maximum, rest interval between the sets being 90 sec. In applied procedure of manual resistance (MR) training method a barbell and free weights were also used. Subjects performed only one set to failure with a workload 60 - 65 % of 1 repitition maximum. mSubjects used knee extension/flexion in both training methods. One-way ANOVA, paired simple T-test and Tukey test were used to evaluate the effects of training. MSPIR training method and MR training method demonstrated a significant increase in dynamic leg strength (PO.05) over 8 weeks training period although they were not significantly different from each other. MSPIR training method and MR training method showed significant increase in the static leg strength (P< 0.05) but they didn't differ significantly from each other. And also both treatment groups showed a significant increase in anaerobic power (vertical jump) (P< 0.05) whereas they were not significantly different from each other. The control group demonstrated no significant change in any of the measured variable. Results indicated a significant gain (P < 0.05) in the static and the dynamic leg strength and anaerobic power by the MSPIR group and the MR group over that of the control group. However, no significant differences in the static and the dynamic leg strength and anaerobic power gain between the two experimental groups was demonstrated.

Özet (Çeviri)

ABSTRACT A COMPARISON OF TWO PRORESSIVE WEIGHT TRAINING METHODS ON LEG STRENGTH AND ANAEROBIC POWER OF HIGH SCHOOL BOYS YÜKTAŞIR Bekir M.S. in Physical Education Supervisor : Assoc.Prof. Dr.Fehmi TUNCEL Co-Supervisor : Assoc.Prof.Dr.Kemal Tamer July 1995 46 Pages The effect of eight weeks of multiple set progressive isotonic resistance (MSPIR) training and manual resistance (MR) training methods on the static and the dynamic leg strength and anaerobic power (vertical jump) were compared in forty seven high school boys aged 16-17 years. The subjects were classified into a control group (n=16), multiple set progressive isotonic resistance training group (n=16) and manual resistance group (n=15). Standardized field tests were used to measure the subject's performance. All measurements were accomplished within one week before and one week after traning. In applied procedure of multiple set progressive isotonic resistance (MSPIR) training method a barbell and free weights were used as a training equipment. Subjects exercised three sets of six repititions with a workload 80 - 85 % of one repitition maximum, rest interval between the sets being 90 sec. In applied procedure of manual resistance (MR) training method a barbell and free weights were also used. Subjects performed only one set to failure with a workload 60 - 65 % of 1 repitition maximum. mSubjects used knee extension/flexion in both training methods. One-way ANOVA, paired simple T-test and Tukey test were used to evaluate the effects of training. MSPIR training method and MR training method demonstrated a significant increase in dynamic leg strength (PO.05) over 8 weeks training period although they were not significantly different from each other. MSPIR training method and MR training method showed significant increase in the static leg strength (P< 0.05) but they didn't differ significantly from each other. And also both treatment groups showed a significant increase in anaerobic power (vertical jump) (P< 0.05) whereas they were not significantly different from each other. The control group demonstrated no significant change in any of the measured variable. Results indicated a significant gain (P < 0.05) in the static and the dynamic leg strength and anaerobic power by the MSPIR group and the MR group over that of the control group. However, no significant differences in the static and the dynamic leg strength and anaerobic power gain between the two experimental groups was demonstrated.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Tez No

    314525

    İnme hastalarında ilerleyici denge eğitimi ve oyun teknolojisi destekli denge eğitimi yöntemlerinin etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

    A comparison of the effectiveness of progressive balance training and game technology based balance training approaches in patients with stroke

    GÖZDE İYİGÜN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2012

    Fiziksel Tıp ve RehabilitasyonHacettepe Üniversitesi

    Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. SİBEL AKSU YILDIRIM

  2. Tez No

    547923

    Takım çalışması esaslı demontaj hattı için optimizasyon yaklaşımı: Beyaz eşya endüstrisinde bir uygulama

    An optimization aprroach for balancing multi-manned disassembly lines: An application from white goods industry

    DİCLE ASLAN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Endüstri ve Endüstri Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. EMRE ÇEVİKCAN

  3. Tez No

    482678

    Antenatal eğitim alan ve almayan gebelerin doğum sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

    Comparison of the birth outcomes between pregnant women whom received antenatal training and whom did not

    MUSTAFA BAKIRCI

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2017

    Kadın Hastalıkları ve DoğumSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi

    Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. FULYA KAYIKÇIOĞLU

  4. Tez No

    808294

    Siroz tanılı hastalarda depresyon riski ve uyku bozukluğunun değerlendirilmesi

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    ZEYNEP BÜŞRA AKIN

    Tıpta Uzmanlık

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    GastroenterolojiSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi

    İç Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ALPASLAN TANOĞLU

  5. Tez No

    633411

    Gömülü sistemlerde sesli komut tanıma

    Voice command recognation in embedded systems

    CAN ÇETİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    Mekatronik Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Mekatronik Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MUSTAFA DOĞAN

Geri Dön