Kimyasal gübrede yeni subvansiyon uygulamasının Yüreğir İlçesi köylerinde değerlendirilmesi
Analysis of the new subsidy application in chemical fertilizer in the villages of Yüreğir
- Tez No: 50390
- Danışmanlar: Y.DOÇ.DR. ENVER ORHAN
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Ziraat, Agriculture
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1996
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Çukurova Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 146
Özet
141 subvention, and 7.27 % of the cultivations implied that it was useful for fertilizer wholesale distrubitor,7.25 % of the cultivations have not expressed any views in that regard. In order for the application of the new fertilizer subvention to reach its aim, and increase in the facility of making use of subvention which will be able to solve the problems must be taken. On the other hand,what is important is to make it possible for those who need a subvention to make use it. With the result that, it will be beneficial for both the government that provides the subvention and the producers who make use of the subvention.140 subvention used in the whole cultivated land drops. When the reasons for not making use of the new fertilizer subvention were analysed according to the group of the cultivation width, it was found that, 47,06 % of the cultivation did not make use of subvention on the occasion that they worked up for hire field. For this reason, they could not take title-deed from landed proprietor, 23.53 % of the cultivation revealed because of that they found expenses of the documents which are arranged for making use of the subvention is very high. 11.76 % of the cultivations revealed that there were too many bureaucratic processes, 11. 76 % of the cultivations revealed that because they worked up to treasure- field they did not pay any rent for the field,for this reason, although they are members of the cooperative, the cooperative does not accept their fertilizer invoices which they received from persons or companies, other than the cooperative itself, and 5.88 % of the cultivations were not registered in title.deed office. When the opinions of the producers about the application of the fertilizer subvention were analyzed according to group of the cultivation width, 16.67 % of the cultivation express that the application has to continue in exactly the same way, 16.67 % of the cultivations implied that, as before, fertilizer has to made subsidied according to the registration of factory, 21.67 % of cultivations require that the application has to continue in exactly the same way but bureaucratic processes must be depleted. 40 % of the cultivations implied instead of the subvention of the fertilizer, high base price must be given to the crops. 5 % of the cultivations implied that according to crops, proportion of the fertilizer subvention must be different, and subvention payment must be given in due course. When the producers' opinion as to which units the use of the new subvention application does any good was analyzed; 30.91 % of the cultivations analyzed implied that it was useful for government. 1.82 % of the cultivations analyzed implied that it was useful for the fertilizer factories,52,73% of cultivations implied that it was useful for the farmer making use of the141 subvention, and 7.27 % of the cultivations implied that it was useful for fertilizer wholesale distrubitor,7.25 % of the cultivations have not expressed any views in that regard. In order for the application of the new fertilizer subvention to reach its aim, and increase in the facility of making use of subvention which will be able to solve the problems must be taken. On the other hand,what is important is to make it possible for those who need a subvention to make use it. With the result that, it will be beneficial for both the government that provides the subvention and the producers who make use of the subvention.140 subvention used in the whole cultivated land drops. When the reasons for not making use of the new fertilizer subvention were analysed according to the group of the cultivation width, it was found that, 47,06 % of the cultivation did not make use of subvention on the occasion that they worked up for hire field. For this reason, they could not take title-deed from landed proprietor, 23.53 % of the cultivation revealed because of that they found expenses of the documents which are arranged for making use of the subvention is very high. 11.76 % of the cultivations revealed that there were too many bureaucratic processes, 11. 76 % of the cultivations revealed that because they worked up to treasure- field they did not pay any rent for the field,for this reason, although they are members of the cooperative, the cooperative does not accept their fertilizer invoices which they received from persons or companies, other than the cooperative itself, and 5.88 % of the cultivations were not registered in title.deed office. When the opinions of the producers about the application of the fertilizer subvention were analyzed according to group of the cultivation width, 16.67 % of the cultivation express that the application has to continue in exactly the same way, 16.67 % of the cultivations implied that, as before, fertilizer has to made subsidied according to the registration of factory, 21.67 % of cultivations require that the application has to continue in exactly the same way but bureaucratic processes must be depleted. 40 % of the cultivations implied instead of the subvention of the fertilizer, high base price must be given to the crops. 5 % of the cultivations implied that according to crops, proportion of the fertilizer subvention must be different, and subvention payment must be given in due course. When the producers' opinion as to which units the use of the new subvention application does any good was analyzed; 30.91 % of the cultivations analyzed implied that it was useful for government. 1.82 % of the cultivations analyzed implied that it was useful for the fertilizer factories,52,73% of cultivations implied that it was useful for the farmer making use of the
Özet (Çeviri)
137 SUMMARY As in other countries, because of that using facility of agricultural lands has reached the utmost limit, fmding the way for taking more crops from the unit fıeld has become necessary in our country, Fertilizing is öne of the most important yield multiplier applications in vegetable producti'on. The important part of subvention that is applied to the agricultural input has been fertilizer subvention. Applying fertilizer subvention has been the most important factor on the increase of consümption of fertilizer, and realising an increase in the yield. in this study, the new subvention that is applied in the chemical fertilizer was analyzed in the cultivation of the villages of Yüreğir, Adana. The aim of the this study is analyze the level of the usage of the fertilizer, and reasons for not making use of the subvention according to certain criteria, and to bring into action that how existing conditions can be directed. Avarage of the fıeld extensiveness is 119.10 in the cultivation that was analyzed. 66.28 % the fields worked on is vvatery and 32.72 % is dry. 61.38 % of the cultivated fields work up to real estate, 29.54 % of the cultivations work up to rent, and 9.08 % of the cultivations vvork up to shareholder. Avarage of the cultivated fıeld is 134.41 one-tenth-hectare in the region studied. Of this, 40.78 % is vvheat, 18.25 % is cotton, 16.25 % is fırst crop corn, \ l.39 % is seeond crop corn, 9.72 % is water-melon, 0,64 % is grovmdnut and 2.98 % is citrus fields 46.94 % of the cultivetions are members of the Agricultural Credit Cooperatives ( TKK ), 40,82 % of the cultivetions are member of Agricultural138 Selling Cooperatives (TSK), 30.61 % of the cultivations are members of both Of of the two cooperatives. in general, taking into consideration the relationship between increase of the price of the cheraical fertilizer that is used extensively in the region studied, and consıımption of chemical fertilizer, it has been seen that there is no consistent adjustment in the consumption of fertilizer, and relation betvveen prices and consumption has not yielded the expected result. in that case, although the price of the fertilizer has risen in the area,in general there has been no change in the consumption of the fertilizer. Even in some years it has been seen that consumption of the fertilizer has risen. it can be said that during the survey peiod, the relationship for survey crops and price paritİes of fertilizer of the relative price, excluding 1994 year, developed in favour of wheat and corn producers, but it seem to have to the disadvantage of cotton producer. As a result cotton producers faced an income loss. in the survey area,. 24,2 kg nitrogen, 8,7 kg phosphorus, and 4 kg potassium vvas used as plant-nutriment material in 1995 in each öne tenth hectare.Totally, 36.9 kg fertilizer vvas used. it can be said that total amount of the homogeneous nutriment material that was used in the unit field has been över the avarage of that of Turkey. it has been surveyed that, excessive amount of(more than recommended) nitrogen was used in ali crops; in some crops less than recommended phosphoures and potassium was used. If this defıciency is remedied, and use of excessive nitrogen is prevented, quantity and guality of yield would increase. in survey area, 73.47 % of the cultivations analysed according to their groups of cultivation width made full use of the subvention, 16.33 % partial use, and 10.20 % no use at ali.139 Proportion of making full use of the subvention is as follows: it was 86.68 % in 51-100 da.the size group of the cultivation, it was 73,68 % in 1-50 da. the size group of the cultivation, it was 60 % in 101 +'da. the size group of the cultivation. According to the form of the economy the proportion of making use of subvention orderly ; it was 100 % in the cultivation which vvorks up to shareholder, it was 80.55 % in the cultivation that works up to real estate, it was 40 % in the cultivation that vvorks up to rent. According to surveying crops.making full use of subvention is orderly ; it was 78,38 % in the cultivation that has produced wheat, it vvas 65 % in the cultivation that has produced cotton, it vvas 58,33 % in the cultivation that has produced corn, and it vvas 50 % in the cultivation that has produced vvater- melon. in vievv of facility of irrigation, the proportion of making full use of subvention orderly; it vvas 85,18 % in the cultivation vvhich'farms in dry condition, it vvas 59,10 % in the cultivation that farms in vvatery condition. According to the membership of the cultivation to the agricultural cooperatives the proportion of making full use of subvention orderly; it vvas 91.30 % in the cultivation that is menıber of Agricultural Credit Cooperatives, it vvas 85 % in the cultivation that is member of Agricultural Selling Cooperatives. When considering the cıütivated fıelds in getting use of the subvention among the surveyed cultivations, vvhile the proportion of the subvention vvas 30 % the agricultural cultivations studied used the suvention in the 91.77 % of the total cultivated land, vvhen the proportion of the subvention vvas raised to 50 % 94.84 % of the total cultivated land made use of the subvention. The rise is 3.30%. in a situation vvhen the subvention proportion is both 30 % and 50 %, it is determined that as the size of the cultivation grows,the proportion of the140 subvention used in the whole cultivated land drops. When the reasons for not making use of the new fertilizer subvention were analysed according to the group of the cultivation width, it was found that, 47,06 % of the cultivation did not make use of subvention on the occasion that they worked up for hire field. For this reason, they could not take title-deed from landed proprietor, 23.53 % of the cultivation revealed because of that they found expenses of the documents which are arranged for making use of the subvention is very high. 11.76 % of the cultivations revealed that there were too many bureaucratic processes, 11. 76 % of the cultivations revealed that because they worked up to treasure- field they did not pay any rent for the field,for this reason, although they are members of the cooperative, the cooperative does not accept their fertilizer invoices which they received from persons or companies, other than the cooperative itself, and 5.88 % of the cultivations were not registered in title.deed office. When the opinions of the producers about the application of the fertilizer subvention were analyzed according to group of the cultivation width, 16.67 % of the cultivation express that the application has to continue in exactly the same way, 16.67 % of the cultivations implied that, as before, fertilizer has to made subsidied according to the registration of factory, 21.67 % of cultivations require that the application has to continue in exactly the same way but bureaucratic processes must be depleted. 40 % of the cultivations implied instead of the subvention of the fertilizer, high base price must be given to the crops. 5 % of the cultivations implied that according to crops, proportion of the fertilizer subvention must be different, and subvention payment must be given in due course. When the producers' opinion as to which units the use of the new subvention application does any good was analyzed; 30.91 % of the cultivations analyzed implied that it was useful for government. 1.82 % of the cultivations analyzed implied that it was useful for the fertilizer factories,52,73% of cultivations implied that it was useful for the farmer making use of the141 subvention, and 7.27 % of the cultivations implied that it was useful for fertilizer wholesale distrubitor,7.25 % of the cultivations have not expressed any views in that regard. In order for the application of the new fertilizer subvention to reach its aim, and increase in the facility of making use of subvention which will be able to solve the problems must be taken. On the other hand,what is important is to make it possible for those who need a subvention to make use it. With the result that, it will be beneficial for both the government that provides the subvention and the producers who make use of the subvention.
Benzer Tezler
- Türk tarımında gübre: İzlenen politikalar ve gübre sübvansiyonunun ekonomik analizi
Fertilizer in Turkish agriculture: Policies and economic analysis of fertilizer subsidy
HASAN YILMAZ
- Determination of performances of slow release fertilizers
Yavaş yarayışlı gübrelerin performanslarının saptanması
MEHMET DAĞLIOĞLU
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2013
Kimya MühendisliğiMarmara ÜniversitesiKimya Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. EMİN ARCA
PROF. DR. ENİS MORKOÇ
- Determination of nitrogen budget of Turkey: A dynamic systems approach
Türkiye'nin azot bütçesinin belirlenmesi: Dinamik sistemler yaklaşımı
AYSUN BOŞÇA
Doktora
İngilizce
2022
Çevre MühendisliğiHacettepe ÜniversitesiÇevre Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. SELİM LATİF SANİN
- Bacillus subtilis bakterisinin üremesine ortam koşullarının etkisi
Effects of different conditions on the growth of Bacillus subtilis bacteria
BERNA ALICI
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
Kimya MühendisliğiGazi ÜniversitesiKimya Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MÜBECCEL ERGUN