Politics of responsibility: From Aristotle to Heidegger and beyond
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 539635
- Danışmanlar: Dr. PATCHEN MARKELL
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Siyasal Bilimler, Political Science
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2009
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Chicago
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 207
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
My dissertation offers a new conceptualisation of responsibility from a Heideggerian perspective, which aims to move the problematic of human responsibility to a historico-ontological plane which is also political in its essence. I conceptualise responsibility as capability of the Self to respond to its ontological possibilities, by first disclosing the historical conditions that shape and limit those possibilities. In Chapter One, my main aim is to introduce this concept by distinguishing it radically from the dominant discourse of responsibility and its metaphysical foundations. I argue that responsibility is ultimately a self-responsibility; i.e. before and beyond one's actions and their consequences responsibility is for Self, which is to be taken not in sense of a“subject”but a way of being in the general mode of what Heidegger called Being-in-the-world. The Self can thus respond to and for itself only out of the particular world into which it is“thrown”, by first dis-closing it, through a combination of understanding and praxis. As the title of the dissertation suggests, I find the origins of this concept of responsibility in Aristotle's thinking, to which I devote Chapter Two. I argue that in Aristotle's thought there is a richer concept of human responsibility than the one to which it is usually reduced, which is ultimately a matter of the openness of the self to its highest possibilities of being Aristotle calls aretē which has its intellectual and ethical components. By returning to Aristotle I also find the origins of another essential aspect of human responsibility which I try to develop in the latter part of the dissertation, namely disposition – what Aristotle calls ethos – as the historico-ontological ground of responsibility. But Aristotle himself was not able, but first of all not in a position, to see to its full extent the historicity of human disposition as the ground of human responsibility. The aim of the last two chapters is, accordingly, to do justice to this historicity which demands that we re-introduce Heidegger but also go beyond him, for this historicity needs to be seen in its concreteness, and in its essentially political character.
Benzer Tezler
- La souveraineté et la question de l'animal chez Derrida
Derrida'da egemenlik ve hayvan sorusu
BİLGESU ŞİŞMAN
Yüksek Lisans
Fransızca
2013
FelsefeGalatasaray ÜniversitesiFelsefe Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. ZEYNEP DİREK
- Aristoteles ve Farabi'de devlet felsefesi
The philosophy of the state in Aristotle and Farabi
YAĞMUR TAŞ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2022
DinErciyes ÜniversitesiFelsefe ve Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. SALİH YALIN
- Uluslararası hukukta iç savaşın düzenleme altına alınması
The regulation of civil war under international law
MEHMET CENGİZ UZUN
- Phronēsis: Aristoteles düşüncesinde etik ve politika ilişkisi
Phronēsis: the relationship between ethics and politics in the Aristotelian thought
HAYRETTİN FURKAN LİVAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2016
Siyasal BilimlerHacettepe ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. RUHTAN YALÇINER