Honour killings in Turkey: culture, subjectivism, and provocation
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 712533
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. DANIŞMAN YOK
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2010
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Keele University
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 306
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Honour killing is qualitatively different from other kinds of murders. It is governed by a particular cultural understanding of honour and shame, which can leave little freedom of choice for defendants. However, the voice of the defendant who has committed honour killing has rarely been heard. This thesis makes a start in supplying this missing focus, by exploring in detail what was felt, lived or experienced by the defendants in such cases. One of the claims of this thesis, based on its original field work, is that the conventional image of honour killings and the defendants who killed for honour is a flawed view. The real picture is much more complex. It is simply wrong to categorise all honour killing cases as revenge killings. In the trial of honour killings, the only realistic defence strategy is the partial defence of provocation, or loss of control. However, there is judicial reluctance to accept a cultural defence, or to allow provocation based on a different cultural understanding of honour and shame, specifically in honour killing cases. This approach is against the concept of human frailty, which is the underlying rationale of the defence of provocation, and puts defendants in certain honour killing cases in a disadvantaged position, by leaving them almost no defence to argue. It overlooks the possibility of causing injustice in honour killing cases where the mental or emotional condition of the defendant is likely to fall short of diminished responsibility but where there is evidence to show that the partial defence of loss of control or provocation might well otherwise apply. To provide a fair trial and equal treatment in honour killing cases the ordinary person test should be reformulated, and cultural evidence provided by expert witnesses to explain the nature of the defendant's act, and psychiatric evidence to explain the defendant's state of mind should be admitted for the consideration of jury
Benzer Tezler
- Türkiye'de namus adına işlenen cinayetler: Mücadele ve kazanımlar KAMER örneği
Killings in the name of honour in Turkey: Struggle and gains KAMER case
ÖZGE ÜNKAP
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2009
Sosyolojiİstanbul ÜniversitesiSosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. İNCİ ÖZKAN KERESTECİOĞLU
- Namus temsili: Farklı alt kimlikler açısından bir karşılaştırma
Representati̇on of honour: a compari̇son in terms of di̇fferent sub i̇denti̇ti̇es
ÖZEN KURTULUŞ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2015
HukukMersin ÜniversitesiKadın Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. NALAN YETİM
- Türkiye'de cinsiyet eşitliği söylemi ve uygulamaları: Karşılaştırmalı analiz
Gender equality discourse and applications in Turkey: Comparative analysis
TUĞÇE ARTAR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
Uluslararası İlişkilerTekirdağ Namık Kemal ÜniversitesiKüreselleşme ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. AYŞE FİLDİŞ
- Woman phase of narrative
Hikayenin kadın hali
CEREN ERDEM
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2004
Sahne ve Görüntü SanatlarıSabancı ÜniversitesiGörsel Sanatlar ve Görsel İletişim Tasarımı Ana Bilim Dalı
MURAT GERMEN
- Kadın cinayetleri Muş-Bitlis örneği
Women murders Muş-Bitlis sample
SULTAN ATEŞ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
Siyasal BilimlerMuş Alparslan ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ORHAN KESKİNTAŞ