Geri Dön

Honour killings in Turkey: culture, subjectivism, and provocation

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 712533
  2. Yazar: RECEP DOĞAN
  3. Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. DANIŞMAN YOK
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Hukuk, Law
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2010
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Keele University
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 306

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

Honour killing is qualitatively different from other kinds of murders. It is governed by a particular cultural understanding of honour and shame, which can leave little freedom of choice for defendants. However, the voice of the defendant who has committed honour killing has rarely been heard. This thesis makes a start in supplying this missing focus, by exploring in detail what was felt, lived or experienced by the defendants in such cases. One of the claims of this thesis, based on its original field work, is that the conventional image of honour killings and the defendants who killed for honour is a flawed view. The real picture is much more complex. It is simply wrong to categorise all honour killing cases as revenge killings. In the trial of honour killings, the only realistic defence strategy is the partial defence of provocation, or loss of control. However, there is judicial reluctance to accept a cultural defence, or to allow provocation based on a different cultural understanding of honour and shame, specifically in honour killing cases. This approach is against the concept of human frailty, which is the underlying rationale of the defence of provocation, and puts defendants in certain honour killing cases in a disadvantaged position, by leaving them almost no defence to argue. It overlooks the possibility of causing injustice in honour killing cases where the mental or emotional condition of the defendant is likely to fall short of diminished responsibility but where there is evidence to show that the partial defence of loss of control or provocation might well otherwise apply. To provide a fair trial and equal treatment in honour killing cases the ordinary person test should be reformulated, and cultural evidence provided by expert witnesses to explain the nature of the defendant's act, and psychiatric evidence to explain the defendant's state of mind should be admitted for the consideration of jury

Benzer Tezler

  1. Türkiye'de namus adına işlenen cinayetler: Mücadele ve kazanımlar KAMER örneği

    Killings in the name of honour in Turkey: Struggle and gains KAMER case

    ÖZGE ÜNKAP

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2009

    Sosyolojiİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. İNCİ ÖZKAN KERESTECİOĞLU

  2. Namus temsili: Farklı alt kimlikler açısından bir karşılaştırma

    Representati̇on of honour: a compari̇son in terms of di̇fferent sub i̇denti̇ti̇es

    ÖZEN KURTULUŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2015

    HukukMersin Üniversitesi

    Kadın Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NALAN YETİM

  3. Türkiye'de cinsiyet eşitliği söylemi ve uygulamaları: Karşılaştırmalı analiz

    Gender equality discourse and applications in Turkey: Comparative analysis

    TUĞÇE ARTAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    Uluslararası İlişkilerTekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi

    Küreselleşme ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. AYŞE FİLDİŞ

  4. Woman phase of narrative

    Hikayenin kadın hali

    CEREN ERDEM

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2004

    Sahne ve Görüntü SanatlarıSabancı Üniversitesi

    Görsel Sanatlar ve Görsel İletişim Tasarımı Ana Bilim Dalı

    MURAT GERMEN

  5. Kadın cinayetleri Muş-Bitlis örneği

    Women murders Muş-Bitlis sample

    SULTAN ATEŞ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2020

    Siyasal BilimlerMuş Alparslan Üniversitesi

    Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ORHAN KESKİNTAŞ