The freedom of movementrights of Turkish citizens in theEu
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 715567
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DONNA MARGARET LYONSB
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2020
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Dublin (Trinity College)
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 50
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This dissertation considers the freedom of movement (free movement) rights of Turkish citizens in the European Union (EU). Under EU law, there are four fundamental freedoms, free movement of persons, free movement of services, free movement of goods and free movement of capital. These freedoms are guaranteed under Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) for EU citizens. However, the EU has the competence to sign association agreements with third countries. Turkey is one of these third countries, which signed the Ankara Agreement (AA) with the EU in 1963. The AA, which entered into force in 1964, governs the association between Turkey and the EU, and it specifies the principles of the association. Regarding the historical chronology of the relations, the parties signed the Additional Protocol (AP) in 1970. Heeding Turkey's European integration endeavors, the Association Council (AC) Decisions, such as Decision 1/80, were signed afterwards. Although the customs union between the parties (AC Decision 1/95) initiated the last stage of the association, the parties aimed to embark on a quest to find mutual responses against regional and global problems. The Visa Liberalization Dialogue (VLD) in parallel with the objective of preventing irregular migration, was one of these responses. The parties initiated the VLD in 2013. Currently, the political and legal findings indicate that the EU-Turkey relations are in a deadlock. In consideration with its everlasting outcomes, this dissertation will argue that the freedom of movement rights of Turkish citizens in the EU were jeopardized due to the legally baseless and asymmetrical interpretations of the EU-Turkey Association Law. Mainly, the primacy of the EU-Turkey Association Law over secondary legislation will be emphasized in order to facilitate the enforcement of the rights. Meanwhile, this paper will also lay stress on the necessity of finding a coherent Court of Justice of the EU (ECJ/ Court) jurisprudence.
Benzer Tezler
- İslam Hukukunda fikir ve inanç hürriyeti
The Freedom of thought and belief in Islamic Law
TEMEL ŞEN
Doktora
Türkçe
1999
DinOndokuz Mayıs ÜniversitesiTemel İslam Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MUHSİN KOÇAK
- II.Meşrutiyetten Harf Devrimine güzel sanatlar dergilerinde dekoratif öğeler ve illüstrasyonlar
Elements and illustrations found in the fine arts periodicals published during the term between the 2nd Constitutional period and the Alphabet Reform
ARZU AKKAYA
Doktora
Türkçe
2013
Sanat Tarihiİstanbul ÜniversitesiSanat Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MEHMET BAHA TANMAN
- İnternete erişim yasakları çerçevesinde ifade özgürlüğünün sınırları
Restraining freedom of expression with regards to prohibitions of internet access
RUMEYSA İSPİR
- The freedom of expression and its reflections in Turkey in the frame of the decision of ECTHR
İfade özgürlüğü ve ifade özgürlüğünün Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararları ışığında Türkiye'ye yansımaları
SENA ELİF KÜTÜK
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2012
HukukAkdeniz ÜniversitesiUluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ŞEYDA EMEK
YRD. DOÇ. DR. RAMAZAN İZOL
- İfade hürriyeti bağlamında basın-yayın hürriyetinin sınırlandırılması
The limitation of freedom of press and publication in the context of freedom of expression
SEVİNÇ KIRGIL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2013
HukukGazi ÜniversitesiRadyo Televizyon ve Sinema Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. AHMET ÇİFTCİ