Normative consensus and regional orders:saudi reaction to systemic crises in the middle east
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 716907
- Danışmanlar: PROF. MUQTEDAR KHAN
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Uluslararası İlişkiler, International Relations
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2019
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University of Delaware
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 307
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This study focuses on the systemic crises in the Middle East regional statesystem. The main question I deal with is“why are there frequent systemic crises in the region?”The current Middle East regional state-system, which was established after the First World War, has gone through various political crises in the last century, such as the revolutions and uprisings caused by the Arab Nationalism in the 1950s and 60s, by the Iranian revolution of 1979 and the following decade, and by the Arab Spring in 2010s. The argument I put forward is that the root causes of these crises are a) legitimacy deficit, b) lack of foreign-domestic distinction, and c) disagreement over the normative consensus in the system by the main actors in the region. While the legitimacy deficit (i.e.: lack of legitimacy of individual governments and the system in general in the eyes of peoples), and lack of foreign domestic distinction (i.e.: porous borders which quickly turns an international crisis into a domestic one, and vice versa) act as permissive causes, proposal for an alternative normative consensus (i.e: alternative sets of ground rules for the system) acts as the efficient cause. To verify if such an explanation is correct, I focus on foreign and domestic politics of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during three episodes of crises: Arab Nationalism, Iranian Revolution, and the Arab Spring. By using process tracing, I reconstruct these episodes of crises from the eyes of Saudi policy makers. I test whether their perception of crises and the precautions they took correspond to causal claims of my argument. I demonstrate that Saudi policy makers also saw the legitimacy deficit, porous borders and normative consensus proposal as the main causes of systemic crises in the Middle East; and designed precautions to curb their influence.
Benzer Tezler
- Yeni bölgecilik anlayışı çerçevesinde iletişimsel planlama pratiğinin irdelenmesi: Hatay örneği
Examining the communicative planning practise under the overall framework provided by new regionalism: The case of Hatay
NAİL GÖKHAN KARABULUT
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2015
Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. E.FERHAN GEZİCİ KORTEN
- Politik bir müzakere süreci olarak kamusal mekanın tasarımı
Design of public space as a political negotiation process
İDİL AKYOL KOÇHAN
Doktora
Türkçe
2024
Siyasal BilimlerMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar ÜniversitesiŞehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. EBRU FİRİDİN ÖZGÜR
- Interregional Relations: Perspectives on the Summit of South American-Arab Countries 'New' patterns of engagement
Bölgelerarasi ilişkiler: Güney Amerika - Arap Ülkeleri zirvesindeki 'Yeni' angajman yapısı perspektifleri
MARSHA MARİE HALL
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2015
Uluslararası İlişkilerOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiOrtadoğu Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. MELİHA BENLİ ALTUNIŞIK
DOÇ. DR. DERYA GÖÇER AKDER
- The European human rights regime: Creation, evolution, and the defining characteristics from a cognitive perspective
Başlık çevirisi yok
GÜL SOSAY
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
1992
SosyolojiBoğaziçi ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. KEMAL KİRİŞÇİ
- Girişimcilik teorileri ve girişimci tipleri: Antalya-Burdur-Isparta illerinde (İBBS Düzey 2 tr61 Bölgesinde) imalat sanayi KOBİ'lerindeki girişimciler üzerine bir inceleme
Entrepreneurship theories and entrepreneur types: an investigation on the entrepreneurs of the manufacturing industry SMES in Antalya-Burdur-Isparta provinces (NUTS2 TR61 Region)
GÖKHAN ÖZKUL