Geri Dön

Shared reality, in-group positivity, and consensus

Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.

  1. Tez No: 721250
  2. Yazar: İREM EKER
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. ALEKSANDRA CİCHOCKA
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Psikoloji, Psychology
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: need for shared reality, collective narcissism, in-group positivity, consensus
  7. Yıl: 2017
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: The University of Kent
  10. Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 45

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

It has long been known that groups have an importance for individuals. Group members tend to evaluate their in-groups in a positive manner. Social psychology literature differentiates between defensive and secure in-group positivity in an attempt to understand their respective effects on intergroup relations. While collective narcissism reflects defensive in-group positivity, non-narcissistic in-group positivity reflects the secure part of it. Groups are also known to satisfy individual needs. This study investigates the role of the need for shared reality as a precursor motive for these two types of in-group positivity. Because shared reality closely relates to consensus, it also tests the role of collective narcissism and non-narcissistic in-group positivity in predicting perceived consensus. I hypothesized that need for shared reality will predict higher collective narcissism, but not non-narcissistic in-group positivity, and consensus. I also predicted that collective narcissism will mediate the relationship between the need for shared reality and consensus. To test the proposed links, university students (N = 236, 188 female, Mage = 21.03) were asked to respond a set of questionnaires. The need for shared reality did not correlate significantly with collective narcissism or identification. Regression results indicated that non-narcissistic in-group positivity predicted perceived consensus. Collective narcissism had negative coefficients; however, it was not a significant predictor for perceived consensus. The study concludes that perceptions of consensus might be explained by nonnarcissistic in-group positivity. The relationship between collective narcissism and perceived consensus requires further investigations. Finally, experimental methods or other measures should be employed to assess the need for shared reality.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Göstergebilim ışığında modernizm, postmodernizm ve bir örnek: Klassis

    In the light of semiotics modernism, postmodernism and an example:Klassis

    BÜLENT TANJU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1991

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF.DR. FİLİZ ÖZER

  2. Sanal gerçeklik alışveriş deneyiminin teknoloji kabulüaçısından incelenmesi

    Investigation of virtual reality based shoppingexperience in terms of technology acceptance

    MEHMET ZAFER ÖZCAN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2024

    Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımıİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Endüstriyel Tasarım Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ EKREM CEM ALPPAY

  3. Exploring opinions of corporate instructional designers on their professional development and training needs

    Kurumsal öğretim tasarımcılarının mesleki gelişim ve eğitim ihtiyaçları konusundaki görüşlerinin araştırılması

    NAZLI GÖKALP

    Yüksek Lisans

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2025

    Eğitim ve ÖğretimOrta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi

    Eğitim Programları ve Öğretimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ELİF ÖZTÜRK

  4. Uluslararası hukukta iç savaşın düzenleme altına alınması

    The regulation of civil war under international law

    MEHMET CENGİZ UZUN

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2023

    HukukGalatasaray Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. AKİF EMRE ÖKTEM

  5. 1908-1946 Türkiye mimarlığının kavramsal çerçevesi

    Başlık çevirisi yok

    BÜLENT TANJU

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    1999

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    PROF. DR. GÜNKUT AKIN