Judicial review mechanisms in global administrative lawhow can international courts bring accountability to global governance?
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 770927
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. NİELS BLOKKER
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2022
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Unıversıteıt Leıden
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.
Özet
In recent years, the classical international law perspective, which is based on inter-state relations, consent-based framework and sovereign equality of states, is being challenged by globalisation and global governance. The proliferation of global regulatory bodies and the increase in their areas of activities created pressure on the classical structure of international law. As a result of this process, today, the distinction between international law and domestic law is unclear, soft-law rules are commonly used, and most importantly, international law is considered less legitimate. Global Administrative Law (GAL) is one of the responses to this issue. GAL, as a concept, is based on the idea that global governance can be understood as an administration, and as it has been in domestic administrative law, administrative-law-like principles are emerging in global space, such as transparency, consultation, participation, reasoned decisions and review mechanisms. This thesis aims to analyse the judicial review mechanisms and their role in bringing accountability and legitimacy to global governance. Including the increasing activities of the international courts and tribunals, which attracts criticism and appraisals simultaneously, regional and national courts have also been actively involved with global affairs recently. While some arguing national authorities are wellsuited to review global regulatory bodies, others claim that the international courts are the better choice? However, even supporters of international courts cannot agree on mechanisms or procedures. Within this myriad of choices and approaches, in this study, it is suggested that the independent and impartial internal review mechanisms with compulsory jurisdiction and allowing private actors to refer this courts is the best way to achieve this goal
Özet (Çeviri)
Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.
Benzer Tezler
- Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararlarının uygulanması: Türkiye örneği
Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: The Turkish example
MUAMMER ÖZ
- Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin özel hayatın gizliliği hakkına etkisi: AİSH'nin 8. maddesi ışığında AİHM içtihatlarının dinamik yorumu ve uluslararası hukukla karşılaştırmalı bir analizi
The impact of artificial intelligence technologies on the right to privacy: A dynamic interpretation of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in the light of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and a comparative analysis with international law
EMİNE ESTEL GEZER
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2026
Hukukİstanbul Kültür ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. MUSTAFA AYTAÇ ÖZELÇİ
- Gümrük Birliği sürecinin Türk sermaye piyasasına etkileri
The Effects of Customer Union course on Turkish capital market
ÖNDER HALİSDEMİR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
1997
EkonomiMarmara ÜniversitesiSermaye Piyasası ve Borsa Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. İLHAN ULUDAĞ
- Uluslararası iklim değişikliği hukukunun devlet egemenliği ilkesi üzerinde etkisi
The impact of international climate change law in the principle of state sovereignty
DAMLA TİMUR