Illegally obtained evidence and right to a fair trial
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 794803
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2022
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: The University of Reading
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 76
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This dissertation examines how the non-existence of an automatic exclusionary rule in the European Court of Human Rights practice affects applicants' right to a fair trial. As evidence in a criminal process forms the reason for conviction and the procedure as a whole, studying any unlawful means of evidence gathering and its effects on the fairness of the trial is of importance. Current literature on this topic focuses on ECtHR's jurisprudence without considering its unique structure. In addition, the issue of illegally obtained evidence is a complicated problem to handle even without assessing its effect on the fairness of a trial. This work explores ECtHR's jurisprudence by focusing on rationales of exclusion, United States' Exclusionary system and the Court's interpretative ways and jurisprudence by depending on mainly doctrinal analyses together with some comparative analyses of legal scholarship and the Court's case-law. It argues that the non-exclusion of automatic exclusionary rules does not imply direct conclusions on the fairness of the trial. The Court's practice differs according to the violation in the procurement of evidence. It, in some cases, constitutes practice similar to automatic exclusion, while in others apply balancing practice to maintain the fairness of the trial. Although this practice seems convenient, it also creates problems of obscurity and inconsistencies.
Benzer Tezler
- Türk ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri vergi yargılama hukuklarında delillerin değerlendirilmesi
Evaluation of evidence in Turkish and the United States of America tax procedural laws
MEHMET TANK
- Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukumuzda ispatın mahiyeti
The essence of proof in Criminal Procedure Law
YASİN ÇEVİK
- Ceza Muhakemesinde hukuka aykırı delillerin ispat değeri
Probative value of illegally obtained evidence in Criminal Procedure
YEŞİM YILMAZ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2013
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ÜMİT KOCASAKAL
- Medeni yargılama hukukunda hukuka aykırı şekilde elde edilen delillerin geçerliliği ve kullanılması
Validity and use of illegally obtained evidence in civil procedure law
ZEYNEP DEMİRYÜREK
- Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda delil olarak telefon dinleme
Telephone tapping as an evidence source in Criminal Adjucation law
MEHMET EROL