Who owns the works created by artificial intelligence? To what extent, the existing legal structure can regulate new paradigm generated by artificial intelligence?
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 798340
- Danışmanlar: PROF. DR. STEVE HEDLEY
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bilimleri-Bilgisayar ve Kontrol, Bilim ve Teknoloji, Hukuk, Computer Engineering and Computer Science and Control, Science and Technology, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2019
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: University College Cork
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 76
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
Copyright systems, all over the world, seek to strike a balance between rights of authors and welfare of the large public. In the course of time, the balance in question has been affected by technological developments inter alia other factors that have direct impact on social development. New leaps on information technologies gave rise unbalance yet the copyright systems accomplished to strike the balance, over and over throughout the course. Although it was needed new tools such as new exception and limitations, it might be said that copyright paradigm has remained the same since its occurrence and it has been able to regulate all developments until recent innovations. Today, technology heralds making real the popular sci-fi stories, which are about machines that are capable of original thought and independent action. Reflection of this technology on the coypright field, namely, computer-generated works (CGWs) is entirely different from anything else copyright has ever faced. After the declaration of“death of the author”within the context of birth of the reader in literature in late 1960s, CGWs have recalled the same phrase in copyright law, where author is an unreplaceable constituent, to accommodate the birth of artificially intelligent authors. However, traditionally, copyright systems have been rested on a human creator, who independently and originally creates a work substantially from her/his mind and soul in a way that reflects her/his personality. This fact gives rise a crisis that encompasses the“soul”of copyright, since it brings into question the nature and meaning of the concept of authorship. Beyond its numinous references, this determination is utterly appropriate to point out the extent of the crisis. When authorship concept is called into question, Pandora's Box opens: it is needed to enlarge the examination as wide as to embrace the concept of originality, intellectual creativity and personality as well as the rationale of copyright, the relation between privatization and public domain, even copyright itself. This thesis seeks to answer to the question, who owns the rights on the works generated by AI? To do this, it is needed to investigate and clarify the tension between the traditional structure of copyright law that confers rights on artwork to human creators and AI systems that autonomously and independently create artworks. Lex lata does not delimit the discussion, the thesis examines existing approaches and reform suggestions to provide a vision for lex ferenda as well. This thesis contends that throughout the time viii course when copyright enhanced its protection categories towards new productions that require new technologies, all those developments were employed just as a tool in the hand of human creator, thus, conferring exclusive right on the works to the detriment of society's interest on free flow of information could be justified by both incentive and natural rights rationales. However today, CGWs are being generated by AI by making decisions based on its self-learning that enable it to improve itself similar to human artist. There is no rationale to restrict society's free access to CGWs within the scope of copyright law. Put simply, the most convenient stance within the framework of fundamentals of copyright law is putting CGWs to public domain, in other words, no restriction/copyright protection on CGWs.
Benzer Tezler
- Celebritylerin adını taşıyan markalarda marka yönetim süreci ve Eda Taşpınar markası örneği
Brand management process in celebrities brands and an Eda Taşpınar brand sample
ATACAN BAŞELLİ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
İşletmeİstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesiİşletme Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ MEHMET SAĞLAM
- Türkiye'de dijital eserlerin korunmasında blok zinciri tasarımı ve uygulaması
Blockchain design and implementation for the protection of digital artifacts in Turkey
MUHAMMET MUSTAFA TOZLU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2022
Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bilimleri-Bilgisayar ve KontrolKonya Teknik ÜniversitesiBilgisayar Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. MESUT GÜNDÜZ
- İMALAT İÇİN MÜHENDİSLİK VERİLERİNİN YÖNETİLMESİ
MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING DATA FOR MANUFACTURING
MÜFİT ÇUN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
Endüstri ve Endüstri MühendisliğiMarmara ÜniversitesiMakine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ GÜRCAN ATAKÖK
- Plastik imgelerle otorite
Authority with plastic images
NECLA RÜZGAR KAYIRAN
Sanatta Yeterlik
Türkçe
2004
Güzel SanatlarHacettepe ÜniversitesiResim Ana Sanat Dalı
PROF.DR. HÜSNÜ DAKAK
- Kemal Tahir'in romanlarında kadın kahramanlar
Heroines in the novels of Kemal Tahir
HİLAL DOĞAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2008
Türk Dili ve EdebiyatıSelçuk ÜniversitesiTürk Edebiyatı Bölümü
PROF. DR. MEHMET TEKİN