Recognition and enforcement of foreign commercial arbitral awardsaccording to Turkish law with a comparative focus on Korean law
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 854425
- Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Uluslararası Ticaret, Law, International Trade
- Anahtar Kelimeler: international arbitration, recognition and enforcement, foreign arbitral awards, New York Convention, arbitration-friendliness, comparison
- Yıl: 2019
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Korea University
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 128
Özet
One of the most preferred ways of resolving the disputes from Turkey and Korea's commercial relations is arbitration. The recognition and enforcement of foreign commercial arbitral awards attract considerable attention with the increasing usage of international arbitration between the countries. Considering the arbitration-friendliness of the countries provides convenience when effective recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards desired. The focus of this study is the recognition and enforcement of foreign commercial arbitral awards according to Turkish law while comparing it with similar practices in Korean law by means of the literature review method. The 1958 New York Convention provides a unified and simplified procedure for recognition and enforcement. Both Korea and Turkey apply the 1958 New York Convention for most of the foreign commercial arbitral awards. However, there are differences when it comes to iii practice. Turkish courts tend to have less arbitration-friendly interpretations when public policy is in question. On the same issue, it is expected from a Korean court to have narrow interpretations on the public policy and enforce the awards in a friendlier manner. At the end of this study, Turkey and Korea are found to be applying the 1958 New York Convention in compliance with the international standards. Even so, parties should conclude the arbitration agreement with due diligence in accordance with the legal practices and arbitration-friendliness of the country where recognition or enforcement is desired. When recognition or enforcement of the rendered awards requested in Turkey, parties should be aware of the public policy tendencies. Korea's positive attitude towards the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards on the public policy basis may be a good model to be incentivized by Turkish courts.
Özet (Çeviri)
Özet çevirisi mevcut değil.
Benzer Tezler
- Public policy challenge on enforcement and recognition of commercial arbitrage awards: A comparative analysis under UK and Turkish Law
Başlık çevirisi yok
EKİN DENİZ İLHAN
- Milletlerarası ticari tahkimde tanıma ve tenfize direnme hakkının bir sınırı olarak hakkın kötüye kullanılması yasağı
Başlık çevirisi yok
MEHMET ALİ TANRIKULU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. HATİCE KOCASAKAL
- The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards: Comparing the obstacles in English and Turkish law
Yabancı hakem kararlarının tanınması ve tenfizi; İngiliz ve Türk hukukundaki usuli engellere mukayeseli bakış
SERHAT ESKİYÖRÜK
- The recognition and enforcement of foreignarbitral awards in Turkey: A critical study of thepublic policy exception'
Başlık çevirisi yok
ŞERİFE HANDE ÖZÇELİK
- Yabancı hakem kararlarının tanınması ve tenfizinde kamu düzeni
Public policy in recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards
SEDEN DÜRÜSTKAN
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2016
HukukBahçeşehir ÜniversitesiÖzel Hukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. BURAK HUYSAL
