İdari yargıda mahkeme kararlarının uygulanmasının yargı kararları bağlamında incelenmesi
Examination of the implementation of court decisions in administrative jurisdiction in the context of judicial decisions
- Tez No: 906949
- Danışmanlar: DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ DİLHUN AYAYDIN
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Rule of law, Administrative judicial authorities and decisions, Right to a fair trial, Right to execution of the decision
- Yıl: 2024
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Çankaya Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Kamu Hukuku Bilim Dalı
- Sayfa Sayısı: 240
Özet
Bu çalışmada idari yargı mercilerince verilen kararların kimler tarafından hangi sürede uygulanması gerektiği, uygulanmamasının nasıl ortaya çıktığı, kararların uygulanmasına ilişkin hukuki güvencelerin neler olduğu ve kararların uygulanmaması durumunda buna sebep olanların sorumluğuna değinilecek, mahkeme kararlarının uygulanmamasının sebep olduğu zararların tazmin edilebilme koşullarının belirlenmesi ile buna ilişkin yargı kararlarının değerlendirilmesi ve kararlarda ortaya konulan ölçütlerin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla çalışma yapılacak olup buna ilişkin olarak karar ve mahkeme kavramı, kararların icrai şekli, meydana gelen zarar, zarar ile eylem veya eylemsizlik arasındaki illiyet bağı, konuyla ilgili yargı kararlarıyla belirlenen ölçütler, literatür taraması yapılarak bilimsel eserlerden, doktrinden ve yargı kararlarından yararlanmak suretiyle tez yazımı gerçekleştirilecektir.
Özet (Çeviri)
In the second article of the 1982 Constitution, which defines the characteristics of the Republic, it is stated that the Republic of Turkey is a“state of law.”A state of law is one in which individuals' rights and freedoms are secured, the state is subject to legal rules in all its components, and the legal security of both individuals and society is ensured. The fundamental element of a state of law is that all administrative activities must be conducted in accordance with legal rules, and the administration itself must be constrained by the law. The most important requirement of a state of law is that all actions and decisions of the administration are subject to judicial review. While it is crucial that the actions and decisions of the administration are subject to judicial review, it is equally important that the administration promptly executes the decisions made by judicial authorities. The existence of a decision in the legal realm can only be proven by the execution of that decision. The judicial oversight of the administration, which can be conducted in various ways, can only be achieved by the administration's timely and full execution of the decisions made by administrative judicial authorities, except in cases of factual or legal impossibility. According to the imperative legal rules stated in Article 138 of the Constitution, it is a constitutional obligation for the administration to promptly implement judicial decisions. The administration must comply with judicial decisions and take action or establish procedures according to the requirements of these decisions, which is also a necessity for being a state of law. The administration has no discretion in the implementation of court decisions; it must implement these decisions“exactly”and“without delay.”In the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights, it has been recognized that the right to seek legal remedies and the right to a fair trial, as expressed in Article 36 of the Constitution, not only includes the right to make claims and defenses before judicial authorities but also encompasses the right to obtain what one is entitled to at the end of the trial. The right to execute the decision is considered an element of the right to a fair trial, along with the right to access the court and the right to a decision. Although the execution of court decisions is outside the scope of the trial, it is a complementary element that ensures the trial produces results. It is stipulated in the Paragraph 1 of Article 28 of the Procedure of Administrative Justice Act No. 2577 that the administration is obliged to take action or take action without delay in accordance with the requirements of the decisions of the Council of State, regional administrative courts, administrative and tax courts on the merits and suspension of execution, and that this period cannot exceed 30 (thirty) days as of the notification of the decision to the administration. In the face of the aforementioned principle, the administration has no other option but to implement a judicial decision that is applicable according to the material and legal conditions“exactly”and“without delay”and it is undoubted that the responsibility of the administration will arise in case the Court decisions are not fulfilled within the period specified in the Law. Accordingly, it is clear that the refusal of the administration to implement the judicial decision, which is a constitutional obligation, will also be in the nature of a service defect of the administration. The subject of this study is“Studying the Implementation of Court Decisions in Administrative Jurisdiction in the Context of Judicial Decisions”. For this reason, firstly, the concept of court is mentioned, the courts operating in the administrative jurisdiction are briefly introduced, then the types of judicial decisions in the field of administrative jurisdiction in Türkiye, their applications and the cases of liability that may arise in case of non-implementation of the said judicial decisions and their legal bases are put forward, and the attitude of the judiciary in the cases filed against the non-implementation of court decisions is set forth by reviewing their decisions.
Benzer Tezler
- Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararları ışığında idari yargıda adil yargılanma hakkı
The right to a fair trial in the administrative judiciary in the light of the European Human Rights Treaty and the decisions of the European Human Rights Court
GÜNEŞ MARA BADILLI
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2019
HukukSüleyman Demirel ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. YÜKSEL METİN
- Farklı yargı düzenindeki yargı organı kararlarının birbirleri üzerindeki etkileri
Reciprocal effects of judicial decisions made by judicial and administarative courts
HİLAL ALBAL
- İdari yargı kararlarının uygulanmamasından doğan sorumluluk
Liability arose from the decisions of administrative judicial
OSMAN KAYA
- İdari yargılama usulü kanunu'nun 31. maddesi çerçevesinde medeni yargılama hukuku-idari yargılama hukuku ilişkisi
The relation of civil procedure law and administrative jurisdiction law according to the code of administrative procedure: Clause 31
SEÇKİN YAVUZDOĞAN
- Türkiye'de idari yargı kararlarının uygulanmama durumu
Status of implementation of administrative judicial decisions me in turkey
GAYE TUĞ LEVENT