Geri Dön

Territorial disputes and sovereignty claims: The case of Dokdo/Takeshima and regional perspectives

Toprak anlaşmazlıkları ve egemenlik iddiaları: Dokdo/Takeshima örneği ve ve bölgesel perspektifler

  1. Tez No: 999490
  2. Yazar: ELİF KURT CİVİL
  3. Danışmanlar: DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ZEYNEB HALE EROĞLU SAĞER
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Tarih, Siyasal Bilimler, Uluslararası İlişkiler, History, Political Science, International Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 2025
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Asya Çalışmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Asia has long been home to unresolved territorial and maritime disputes, particularly in the East China Sea and South China Sea. These disputes are not just about law or history but they also reflect the struggles over regional influence. Among these, the dispute involving the islets called Dokdo by Korea and Takeshima by Japan remains one of the most long-standing and sensitive ones in the region. An important cause is the uncertainty embedded in the 1951 San Franciscoso Peace Treaty. While the treaty officially ended World War II and required Japan to give up its colonial claims, it failed to clearly state who holds sovereignty over several islets, including Dokdo/Takeshima. This lack of clarity has allowed Korea and Japan to interpret the treaty in ways that support their respective positions. This thesis examines how the dispute has evolved by analyzing historical events, key treaties and diplomatic statements. To better understand the nature of the disputes, the thesis also compares them with other conflicts in East and Southeast Asia that share similar aspects. By doing so, it examines the impact of the U.S. on the formation of the postwar setting and explores how symbolic actions—like Korea's“Dokdo Day”and Japan's“Takeshima Day”—are used to strengthen national identity and public awareness. This study argues that resolving such disputes requires more than legal solutions; it also requires historical understanding and long-term diplomatic effort.

Özet (Çeviri)

Asia has long been home to unresolved territorial and maritime disputes, particularly in the East China Sea and South China Sea. These disputes are not just about law or history but they also reflect the struggles over the regional influence. Among these, the dispute involving the islets called Dokdo by Korea and Takeshima by Japan remains one of the most long-standing and sensitive one in the region. An important cause is the uncertainty embedded in the 1951 San Franciscoso Peace Treaty. While the treaty officially ended World War II and required Japan to give up its colonial claims, it failed to clearly state who holds sovereignty over several islets, including Dokdo/Takeshima. This lack of clarity has allowed Korea and Japan to interpret the treaty in ways that support their respective positions. This thesis examines how the dispute has evolved by analyzing historical events, key treaties and diplomatic statements. To better understand the nature of the disputes, the thesis also compares it with other conflicts in East and Southeast Asia that share similar aspects. By doing so, it examines the impact of the U.S. on the formation of the postwar setting and explores how symbolic actions—like Korea's“Dokdo Day”and Japan's“Takeshima Day”—are used to strengthen national identity and public awareness. This study argues that resolving such disputes requires more than legal solutions, it also needs historical understanding and long-term diplomatic effort.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Ege sorunları

    Aegean disputes

    RUSLAN KAMALOV

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2007

    HukukAnkara Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü

    PROF. DR. SETAÇ HAMİ BAŞEREN

  2. Kolektif güvenlik anlaşması teşkilatı ve kriz anı karar alma süreçleri: 2010 Kırgızistan olayları örneği

    Collective security treaty organization decision-making processes: The case of Kyrgyzstan

    ABDURRAHMAN ÖZACAR

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    Uluslararası İlişkilerİstanbul Üniversitesi

    Avrasya Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. AYNA ASKEROĞLU ARSLAN

  3. Dağlık Karabağ uyuşmazlığında Rus dış politikasındaki değişimin içsel ve dışsal nedenleri

    Internal and external reasons for the change in Russianforeign policy in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict

    MUHAMMET ALİ

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    Uluslararası İlişkilerBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi

    Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. ÖMER GÖKSEL İŞYAR

  4. The effectiveness of ASEAN's role and impact in regional security: The case study of South China Sea dispute

    ASEAN'ın bölgesel güvenlikteki rolünün ve etkisinin etkinliği: Güney Çin Denizi anlaşmazlığı örneği

    ADHE NUANSA WIBISONO

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2023

    Uluslararası İlişkilerPolis Akademisi

    Uluslararası Güvenlik Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. BAYRAM ALİ SONER

  5. Ülkesel egemenlik bağlamında devletlerin oluşumu ve ülke edinimi: Batı Sahra örneği

    Creations of states and acquisition of territory in context of territorial sovereignty: Case of Western Sahara

    MEHMET TUZCUOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2025

    HukukAnkara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi

    Kamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. MELEK SARAL