Teori ve pratikte supranational Avrupa Topluluk Hukuku (yapısal ve operasyonel bir çalışma)
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 12951
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. NAZİF KUYUCUKLU
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Hukuk, Law
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1991
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: İstanbul Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 10
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
319 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The European initiative started after the Second World War. In 1951, six countries (Belgium, France, West Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and The Netherlands) signed the Treaty of Paris which set up the ECSC (European Coal and Steel Community), concerned with the pooling of production and consumption of coal and steel. In 1957 the same six countries signed the Treaty of Rome, establishing the EEC (European Economic Community) better known as the Common Market, and the EURATOM Treaty (European Atomic Energy Community), designed to promote and supervize the development of nuclear and atomic energy. In 1965, common institutions for the three Communities were established, and became effective in 1967. These three Communities have generally been known as the European Communities, and more recently, simply as the European Community. In 1973, the UK, Denmark and Ireland joined the original six countries, and in 1981 Greece also joined, to be followed in 1986 by Spain and Portugal. The European Union would need institutions with sufficent power to give political leadership, capable of taking action where required to ensure equality for all states, but under democratic control. Such a European Union would require strong political commitment in the member states. By the time Tindemans presented his report to the Community leaders in 1976 it was obvious that the necessary political commitment, if it had ever existed, had evaporated.320 Political commitment to integration had declined at a time when the Community was supposed to be moving forward towards a more ambitions phase of integration. Yet the purpose of integration was to help the mixed-economy industrialised democracies of Western Europe, and the political freedom and social equality which they attempt to provide for their citizens, to survive in the modern world. Community law is both international and municipal, public and private, enacted and formulated in precedents. It is sui generis law and must be treated as such. The three European founding Treaties are the primary source of Community law, laying down the principles and rules which are binding on all Community members, since the nature of the Community itself, its existence, and its functioning, demand a consistent application of Community law between the member states. The acts of the Community represent a second source of Community law. Where uniform rules are needed, it can legislate directly, through regulations which are binding in law throuhghout the Community. They are oautomatically incorporated into the national legal systems of member states without specific individual ratification. The Community legal system has often been compared with that of the federal system of the United States. The basic document of the law, the Constitution, was drafted in terms of general intention and the Supreme Court was left to interpret it and to give it pratical meaning. By the process of judicial review, over Congressional measures and over state laws, the law in the United States has become an instrument in fulfilling the original intentions of the Constitution. The European Community is also a political structure which emerged out of a general act of will; it is an independent structure set up by a number of states which at that time were looking for something separate from and superior to the nation state. It too depends heavily on statements of general principle and about broad objectives. The United States Supreme Court plays a partly political role, the upholding of federal aims. A comparable role is also fulfilled by the legal system of the321 European Community, whose law has been described as the 'motor' to enable it to move towards its ultimate aim, the 'ever closer union' referred to in the preamble of the Treaty of Rome. I. THE SOURCES OF COMMUNITY LAW I. Written sources Foremost among the written sources of Community law is the so-called primary legislation of the European Community created directly by the Member States. It comprises the Community law contained in the Treaties establishing the European Communities themselves, including the annexes, schedules and protocols attached to the Treaties and the subsequent additions and amendments thereto. These include : Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community of 18 April 1951 - 'Treaty of Paris'; Treaty establishing the European Economic Community of 25 March 1957 - Treaty of Rome'; Convention on certain Institutions common to the European Communities of the 25 March 1957; Treaty establishing a Single Commission of the European Communities (Merger Treaty) of 8 April 1965; Treaty concerning the accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, (the Kingdom of Normway) and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the EEC and Euratom of 22 January 1972, including the Act concerning the Conditions of Accession and the Adjustments to the Treaties (Accession Treaty and Act of Accession); Association Agreement with Greece oif 9 July 1961, with Turkey of 12 September 1963, with the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP countries) of 28 February 1975 (First Lome Convention), etc.322 In the Community Treaties the legal acts are listed which the Community instutitutions have at their disposal when carrying out the tasks conferred on them (Art. 189, first paragraph, EEC; Art. 161, first paragraph, Euratom; Art. 14, first paragrafph, ECSC). Although the acts enumerated and described there in are given different names in the EEC and Euratom Treaties on the one hand and in the ECSC Treaty on the other, they may be classified according to their legal affects and 'adresses' as follows : A regulation is described in the second paragraph of Article 189 of the EEC Treaty and the second paragraph of Article 161 of the Euratom Treaty as a legal act which has general application, is binding in its entirety and is directly applicable in all Member States. The second parargraph of Article 14 the ECSC Treaty merely provides that general ECSC decisions are binding in their entirety. A more precise definition has, howover, been given by the Court of Justice, according to which general ECSC decision also are generally and directly applicable in the Member States. General applicability : means that the act is adressed to an indeterminate category of individuals and covers a multitude of unspecified circumstances. Binding effect means that the acts confer rights and impose obligations on those to whom they are addresed. The statement that regulations and general ECSC decisions are binding in their entirety serves to distinguish them from directives and ECSC recommendations, which are binding only as to the result to be achieved. Direct applicability : means that the legal effects occur without any intervention by Member States or their institutions. Regulations and general ECSC decisions therefore apply not only to, but also in, the Member States. Because of their general and abstract caharacter, reglutaions and general ECSC decisions have the same structure, as far as their content is concerned, as national laws. The Court therefore started in Case 8/55 (F£dechar), with regard to general ECSC decisions, that such acts are 'quasi-legislative measures'. In their capacity as general323 legislative acts of the Community, reglutaions and general ECSC decisions are instruments for securing the uniformity of laws. The secondary legislation of the Community is a further written source of Community law. This consists of the created by the Community institutions. It comes into being primarily as a result of the legal acts expressly provided for in the Treaties in so far as they concern binding rules. This is the case with reglutaions, directives, decisions adressed to individuals and States, and recommendations made under the ECSC Treaty. International agreements conculuded by the Community as an entity having international legal personality my be considered the final written source of Community law. The tariff and trade agreements concluded by the Community (see Arts III and 113 of the EEC Treaty) my be singled out in this connection. Whether such international agreements entered into by the Community rank as Community law or as international law in the Community legal system has not yet be settled conclusively. In view of the Council's practice of implementing international agreements by means of secondary Community legal acts - regulations and decisions in particular - it must be assumed that the provisions of international agreements are there by 'transformed' simultaneously into Community law. Such Community acts therefore are comparable to the rules which some of the Member States adopt when incorporating international agreements into their legal system. 2. Unwritten sources The general principles of law are one unwritten source of Community law. The existences and validity of general principles of law as a form of Community law arise primarily from the second paragraph of Article 215 of the EEC Treaty, which refers to the general principles common to the laws of the Member States in the case of non-conractual liability. On the other hand, Article 164 of the EEC Treaty, Article 136 of the Euratom Treaty and Article 31 of the ECSC Treaty enstrust the Court of Justice of the European324 Communities with the task of insuring that 'in the interpretation and application of this Treaty the law is observed'. This wording shows that, in performing its task, the Court is not restricted to written Community law, but also has to insure that unwritten law, andhence the general principles of law are observed. In its judgments, the Court also has applied the general principles of law in cases other than that refferred to in the Treaty as non-contractual liability in order to close various loopholes. It has had recourse, especially in the field of general administrative law and of fundemental rights, to the general principles of law as a source of Community law. Customary law is another unwritten source of Community law. This consists of law resulting from established practice, and the ensuing conviction that it respresents the law. For example, in Community law the right of the European Parliament to question the Council derives from custom. The general rules of international law may be considered to be only a supplementary source of Community law. Because of their generality they are of significance only in connection with the development of the principles embodied in Community law, and as specific expressions of the general principles of law. The Court of Justice has recourse to them especially when applying the principles of proportionality, good faith and legal certainty. 3. Decisions of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council A futher source consists in the decisions of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council. The Composition of the Council of the assembled representatives of the governments of the Member States is identical with the individuals who also form the Community institution known as the Council. The decisions taken by it are improperly called Council decisions.325 Technically, they are governmental agreements and hence international conventions. Unlike the acts of the Community institutions, they are not taken as a result of the exercise of powers conferred by the Treaties but are based on the Member States capacity to act under international law. Whether in view of their international origin they can be regarded as Community law is still an open question. At all events, there is a close connection with Community law, as the subject-matter and content of such 'Council' decisions relate to Community matters. This is borne out by the fact that such decisions are as a rule published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. II. COMMUNITY LAW AND PROCEDURES Community, law is both international and municipal, public and private, enacted and formulated in precedents. It is sui generis law and must be treated as such. The three European founding Treaties are the primary source of Community law, laying down the principles and rules which are binding on all Community members, since the natuure of the Community itself, its existence, and its functioning, demand a consistent application of Community law between the member states. The acts of Community represent a second source of Community law. Where uniform rules are needed, it can legislate directly, throug regulations which are binding in law throughout the Community. They are automatically incorporated into the national legal systems of member states without specific individual ratification. At the outset it should be noted that Community law, properly made in accordance with the treaties, has priority over any conflicting law of a member states. Where complete uniformity is not essential, the Community can work through the legal systems of the member states. In such cases, the Commission can use directives, which indicate a broad objective and call on the member states to which they are addressed to implement these objectives in harmony, but in their own way. Directives326 require somelegal action, which normally amounts to legislation, by the member states before they become national law. Decisions of the Commission are directed specifically to an individual or an enterprise, and are also binding on them. Recommendations and opinions given by the Council of Ministers or the Commission on matters of general or particular concern do not have binding fore of law, but are useful since they can test the reation to a proposed new Community policy without committing the Commission to that action. Directives and ECSC recommendations are binding as to the result to be achieved upon each Member State and, in the case of ECSC recommendations, on citizens of the Common Market as well. The Member States are obliged to take steps to ensure that the result is achieved. The choice of the form of the measures and methods used in achieving the results required under Community law is left, on the other hand, to the national authorities (Art. 189, third paragraph, EEC: Art. 161, third paragraph, Euratom; Art. 14, third parragraph, ECSC). Directives are also legally binding and are addressed to the member states. They lay down the intended results of legislation, leaving it to the individual member states as to how these aims are to be achieved. However, if they impose an obligation on a member state (e.g. to implement the principle of equal pay for work of equal value) they may possibly be effective even before they are actually implemented in the member state - if that state has not, for example, implemented them properly. These acts are directed exclusively at individual determinable addressees. Addressees may - according to the rules applicable in the EEC - be one or more Member States, or one more individuals in the Member States. Their content may be expressed either in concrete or in abstract terms. Decisions are binding in their entirety, and in this respect they differ from directives and ECSC recommendations. According to the case-law of the Court, decisions addressed to Member States are directly applicable in the same way as directives.327 Decisions are the usual means whereby the Community institutions deal with individual cases. To this extent they are comparable to administrative measures taken pursuant to national law. The recommendations provided for in the EEC Treaty and the Euratom Treaty (Art. 189, fifth paragraph, EEC; Art. 161, fifth paragraph, Euratom) and the opinions common to all the Treaties (Art. 189, fifth paragraph, Euratom; Art. 14, fourth paragraph, ECSC) differ from other acts in that they are not binding and therefore give rise to no legal obligations on the part of the addressees. The addressees are for the most part Member States. Only in a few cases specified in the Treaties may they also be addressed to individuals or undertakings (see Art. 92(1) of the EEC Treaty and Art. 54, fifth paragraph, of the ECSC Treaty). Recommendations and opinions differ from each other in that recomendations are generally made on the initiative of the Community institution issuing them, whereas opinions are delivered as a result of an outside initiative. The purpose of a recommendation is to suggest that the adressee take a specific course of action without legally obligging him to do so. An opinion either contains a general assessment of certain facts or prepares the ground for subsequent legal proceedings (see Arts 169 and 170 of the EEC Treaty and Arts 141 and 142 of the ECSC Treaty). There are also notices which are not really legislation as such, nor do they have the force of law, but they are generally intended to provide guidance. Up to now they have usually been used to assist companies in the field of competition. There are two procedures : the Consultation Procedure; and, since the Single European Act, the Co-operation Procedure. It should be noted that legislation is generally initiated by the Commission.328“THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY'S LAW LEGAL SYSTEM”EEC(Article : 189) EAEC (Article : 161) ECSC (Article : 14) General Decisions Recommendations Decisions Opinions Recommendations Decisions Opinions Regulations Directives Recommendations Decisions Opinios Regulations Directives Consultation procedure (For regulations, directives and decisions of the Council of Ministers.) After general drafts and consultation Commission adopts proposal NOTE: At any stage the Commission may amend or withdraw its original proposal, and may be required to consult again the European Parliament and ECOSOC if changes are significant. Council of Ministers who consults European Parliament Economic and Social Committee (ECOSOC) Opinions published in Official Journal Council of Ministers for final decision. If adopted Publication in Official Journal If rejected proposal may be dropped or started.. again *329 Cosultation Procedure The stages as follows : 1. Commission proposal : The Commission prepares and discusses a preliminary draft with government officials of member states and other relevant bodies. It then adopts the proposal which must then be published in the Official Journal. 2. It goes to Council. The Council of Ministers simultaneously seek the opnions of 3. The European Parliament (who may suggest amendments) and ECOSOC. Both opinions are published in the Official Journal. 4. The draft returns to the Commission- who may amend the proposal if appropriate - and may refer the new proposal to the European Parliament and ECOSOC. The Commission then refers the amended proposal again to 5. Council- which refers it to one of its working parties to discuss the text-and comment on it as appropriate. It goes to 6. COREPER (the Committee of permanent Representatives) who prepare it, then send it back to 7. Council who under the traditional consultation procedure either (a) reject it-so that it has to start again if it is to be approved or (b) adopt it- and it is again published in the Official Journal.330 Co-operation procedure {Wit regulations, directive» «nü decisions of the Council of Ministers »Mowed by the Single European Act, 1787, - broadly for m.ittrrs relating to the establishment of the internal market, social and economic cohesion, ami technological research and development.) After general drafts and consultaiiun,Commission adopts proposalCouncil u( Ministers who consults I European Parliament ] Economic and Social Committee (KCOSOC) Council of Ministers, svho adopts a position,at the least, by qualified majority7" (I) Approves Council ptnition European Parliament % who withm three montht: J u) İ m \ W \ or AmemU Council } ar Reiccu Council of Taket no rHniiion j common pmmun by J common pmition by t aKolııte majority ı atnolute majority \ 7 Council of Ministers adopts proposal Commission, within one month comments, amends, or revises proposal Council may then only act Unanimously Published in Official journal Council of Ministers who, within three months which may be emended with European Parliament approval by one month: | (I) Adopts final proposal by qualified majority (2) Of may un»nimm»!y atlnpt European Patliamrm amendment*, not appruvrJ by CnmmİtMon 0) or May unanimously amend Commotion proposal
Benzer Tezler
- Contribution a la recherche d'un cadre juridique pour un droit international de laconcurrence plus efficace
Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için hukuki çerçeve arayışı
ALİ CENK KESKİN
Doktora
Fransızca
2009
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. JEAN MARC SOREL
PROF. DR. HALİL ERCÜMENT ERDEM
- Temsili demokrasi krizine çözüm olarak katılımcı demokrasi uygulamalarının uluslarüstü düzeyde incelenmesi: Avrupa Birliği örneği
An examination of the practices of participatory democracy at the supranational level as a solution to the crisis of representative democracy: The case of the European Union
KEMAL BARIŞ KILIÇ
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
Kamu YönetimiAkdeniz ÜniversitesiSiyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ YAVUZ SELİM ALKAN
- Klasik egemenlik yaklaşımının dönüşümü: Avrupa Birliği üzerine bir çalışma
The transformation of classic sovereignty approach: An evaluation upon the European Union
TÜRKER DEMİR
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2020
Kamu YönetimiVan Yüzüncü Yıl ÜniversitesiKamu Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. AYSUN YARALI AKKAYA
- Çocuğun özel yaşamının gizliliğinin korunması hakkı
Le droit de l'enfant pour la protection du secret de sa vie privée
DUYGU ÜNAL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2021
HukukGalatasaray ÜniversitesiKamu Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. DEMİRHAN BURAK ÇELİK
- Theory and practice in logistics activities and A BI-criteria model application
Başlık çevirisi yok
FÜSUN ÜLENGİN
