Bir robotik manipülatörün eklem ve kartezyen esaslı öngörülü kontrolu
Joint and cartesian based predictive control of a robotic manipulator
- Tez No: 21718
- Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. CAN ÖZSOY
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Makine Mühendisliği, Mechanical Engineering
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1992
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 283
Özet
ÖZET Bu çalışmada öngörülü kontrol ailesinden olan genelleştirilmiş öngörülü kontrol algoritmasının tic eklemli bir robotik manipülatöre değişik çalışma şartlarında uyarlanması incelenmiştir. Uzun menzilli Öngörülü kontrol algoritmalarının teorisini daha iyi anlayabilmek için adaptif kontrol algoritmaları ve bu konuda yapılan çalışmalar 2. bölümde geniş bir şekilde araştırılmış, 3. bölümde de öngörülü kontrol algoritmaları genel özellikleri ile incelenmiştir. Öngörülü kontrol algoritmaları içerisinde değişik açılardan en etkilisinin genelleştirilmiş Öngörülü kontrol algoritması olduğuna karar verildikten sonra 4. bölümde genelleştirilmiş öngörülü kontrol algoritmasının teorisi geniş bir şekilde çıkarılmıştır. S. bölümde ise genelleştirilmiş öngörülü kontrol algoritması değişik sistemler için performans araştırması yapmak amacı ile kişisel bilgisayarlar ile simülasyon çalışmasına tabii tutulmuş, sonuçlar detaylı bir şekilde verilmiştir. Robot kinematiği ve dinamiği, kullanılan matematik modeller ve parametre kestirme algoritmaları hakkında genel bilgiler verildikten sonra 7. bölümde üç eklemli bir robotik manipulator için yapılan simülasyon çalışmalarına geçilmiştir. Bir fikir vermesi amacı ile tek giriş-tek çıkşlı durum için kendi kendini ayarlayan bir adaptif kontrolörün aynı robotik manipülatöre uyarlanması da incelenmiştir. Öngörülü kontrol algoritması robotik manipülatöre tek giriş-tek çıkış ve çok giriş-çok çıkışlı durumlar için ayrı ayrı uygulanmış ve seçilen kübik ve eksponansiyel yörüngeler için yörünge kontrolü İle ilgili simülasyon çalışmaları ve sonuçları ilave edilmiştir. Ayrıca hesapsal açıdan büyük zorluklara neden olan ters kinematik problemini ortadan kaldıran ve uç elemanın direkt olarak kartezyen koordinatlarda kontrol una imkan veren yeni bir model geliştirilerek öngörülü kontrol algoritması ile uyum içinde çalıştığı gösterilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, genelleştirilmiş öngörülü kontrol algoritmasının tespit edilen yörüngelerin takibini çok yüksek bir hassasiyetle gerçekleştirdiğini ve direkt kartezyen uzay kontrolünün da çok başarılı olduğunu göstermektedir.
Özet (Çeviri)
SUMMARY JOINT AND CARTESIAN BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF A ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR In this study, SI SO and MIMO predictive control (Generalized predictive control -GPC) algorithms are proposed for the trajectory control of a three-link manipulator. Manipulator is controlled both in the joint coordinate system and directly in the cartesian coordinate system. Manipulators have been using extensively, such as in the nuclear industries, deep undersea exploration and maintenance operations, in space and increasingly in industrial automation applications. A mechanical manipulator can be defined as a multi degree of freedom open loop chain of mechanical linkages and joints. These mechanisms driven by actuators are capable of moving an object in space from initial to final locations or along prescribed trajectories. Tracking accuracy is of prime concern in assembly task. Hence, a robot controller should be able to achieve fast and at the same time accurate tracking and positioning control of the gripper. The dynamic equations of a mechanical manipulator are highly nonlineer and complex. To overcome these difficulties, several advanced adaptive control techniques for dynamic control of mechanical manipulators have been proposed, e.g., self-tuning control, model reference adaptive control, long-range predictive control. The equations for the motion of the manipulator may be developed by the direct application of the classical Newtonian mechanics. For a manipulator with m joints the mathematical model which is consist of a set of coupled nonlinear differential equations may be written in the joint coordinate system as follows: DW> 6 + H + G - uCt>... where 0, 0 and 0 are m-di mensi onal vectors signifying the joint position, velocity and acceleration, respectively. D, a symmetric matrix, includes the acceleration related coef f i ci ti ons. of the joints and the effects of link inertia. HC©, ©>,a m dimensional vector, signifies Coriolis and. centrifugal torques. G, a m-di mensi onal vector, represents the torques due to the gravity. The m-di mensi onal vector u, is the system input. The exprossions of D, H and G contain trigonometric functions. A digital simulation of is very time consuming due to a larger number ofmathematical operations. More over, the parameter values vary from task to task. If the model in is first properly linearized about a nominal trajectory and then discretized by Euler's method» a mult i variable discrete-time model is obtained in the form. y = a + A y + A y + Bu + B u + e... 2 where A. and B., i =1,2 are matrices, ao is the m-di mensi onal vector, and the vector e represents modelling errors. The direct use of is difficult because the calculation of the model parameters in the cofficient matrices is a tedious task. Modivated by the form of , a CARIMA «Controlled Auto-Regressive Integrate Moving Average) model is proposed here to model the motion of a manipulator and to design a controller for the system. Such a model will be determined on the basis of the measured input -output data of a manipulator system. The parameters of the model will be determined so that the best fit of the model to the input -output data will be obtained in the least-squares error sense. As is well known, the parameters in such an assumed model can be estimated on-line using recursive equations. They can be obtained by minimizing the sum of the squared errors. The CARIMA model is assumed to have the same number of inputs and outputs. The CARIMA model will be written in the following general form: y = A y + B(q“1)u... where the m-di mensi onal output vector y and the input vector u have as the ith component the output y. and the input u. of joint i, respectively, and 1=1,2,...,m. The equation error vector e in the CARIMA model is considered to be of the form: e = Ç/A... where A is the differencing operator l-q~ and Ç is an uncorrelated random sequence. The argument q~ is backward shift operator. The matrices A and B are polynomials defined by: A a B = B +B q”*+...+ B q~nb... O %? T% O Long-range predi eti ve control has recei vedmuch interest over the last few years as an alternative to one-step-ahead and pole-placement design methods in parameter adaptive control. The well-known Generalized Predictive Control has been found to posses features essential for successful application of self -tuning control to real processes, e.g., robustness against violation of modelling assumptions , applicability to a wide class of systems including open-loop unstable and/or nonminimum phase, and possibly time-varying processes. The majority of Generalized Predictive Control algorithm is basically a combination of a predictor, a cost function, an algorithm to choose a control sequence which minimizes this cost and a parametric identification scheme. The controller minimizes the quadratic cost function N N J = E Cy - yr3 + £ XAu' J=N. j = i where y is the j -step-ahead prediction of the plant. The quantities N4, N^ and X are called the initial horizon, prediction horizon and the control weighting respectively. If we subject the minimization to the assumption that Au = O, for j > Nu, the control horizon, we arrive at the following solution: Au = -1 GT r where: Au = EAu,Au....,Au3 u ty , y , r r,y 3 r 2 f = [f. f.,f] 2 G = g. o g. o o s N 9 2-i N -N 2 u and g. is the Jth value of the model step response. The term J f Ct+J> is the free response of the plant at time t+j, i.e. the output of the model at this time assuming zero future control increments. y is the set point at time t. XIIThe generalized predictive control algorithm will become: 1>- Measure the plant output and external set -point, 2>- Estimate the parameters of the plant using RLS, 3>- Compute the free response f , 4>- Compute g. parameters and Au using Eqn. , S>- Shift the data ready for the next sample. In order to evaluate the behaviour of the generalized predictive control strategies, four sets of simulation studies were carried out (Chapter 5 >. For each set the purpose of the simulation study, the description of the simulated system, the criterion for selecting the tuning parameters, the set point changes and disturbances are described. From the simulation studies it can be concluded that the generalized predictive control algorithms offer interesting features making them suitable for real -lif e- appl i cati ons. This study presents SI SO and MI MO generalized predictive control algorithms CGPO for the trajectory control of a three link manipulator. The performance of the predictive controller was tested for several reference trajectories and under stochastic and deter mi niştik disturbances. Seperate Joint Control : The problem is to design a predictive controller for each joint so as to make the angular motion of each joint follow a desired path specified by discrete points. It is assumed that interactions between the joints are small. Thus coupling terms in the CARIMA model of the manipulator system are omitted and each joint will be controlled independently of the other. For the system, the input is the torque u; applied to the joint motor, and the output is the velocity V. of the joint. Simulations indicate that the system performs well when the seperate joint control is applied. The main advantage of a seperate Joint control is that it is simple. Moreover, the controller can be implemented using microprocessors since the number of updating system parameters is less. Predictive Controller for Interacting Joi nts CMI MO> : In this control scheme, the dynamic couplings are taken into consideration in the design of multivariable GPC controller. The task here is to determine a predictive control scheme for the manipulator joints such that the motion of the manipulator Joints follow a desired path as closely as possible for this system, the input is the torque u. applied to the Joint motor and the output is a XIIImathematical operations. More over, the parameter values vary from task to task. If the model in is first properly linearized about a nominal trajectory and then discretized by Euler's method» a mult i variable discrete-time model is obtained in the form. y = a + A y + A y + Bu + B u + e... 2 where A. and B., i =1,2 are matrices, ao is the m-di mensi onal vector, and the vector e represents modelling errors. The direct use of is difficult because the calculation of the model parameters in the cofficient matrices is a tedious task. Modivated by the form of , a CARIMA «Controlled Auto-Regressive Integrate Moving Average) model is proposed here to model the motion of a manipulator and to design a controller for the system. Such a model will be determined on the basis of the measured input -output data of a manipulator system. The parameters of the model will be determined so that the best fit of the model to the input -output data will be obtained in the least-squares error sense. As is well known, the parameters in such an assumed model can be estimated on-line using recursive equations. They can be obtained by minimizing the sum of the squared errors. The CARIMA model is assumed to have the same number of inputs and outputs. The CARIMA model will be written in the following general form: y = A y + B(q“1)u... where the m-di mensi onal output vector y and the input vector u have as the ith component the output y. and the input u. of joint i, respectively, and 1=1,2,...,m. The equation error vector e in the CARIMA model is considered to be of the form: e = Ç/A... where A is the differencing operator l-q~ and Ç is an uncorrelated random sequence. The argument q~ is backward shift operator. The matrices A and B are polynomials defined by: A a B = B +B q”*+...+ B q~nb... O %? T% O Long-range predi eti ve control has recei vedThe generalized predictive control algorithm will become: 1>- Measure the plant output and external set -point, 2>- Estimate the parameters of the plant using RLS, 3>- Compute the free response f , 4>- Compute g. parameters and Au using Eqn. , S>- Shift the data ready for the next sample. In order to evaluate the behaviour of the generalized predictive control strategies, four sets of simulation studies were carried out (Chapter 5 >. For each set the purpose of the simulation study, the description of the simulated system, the criterion for selecting the tuning parameters, the set point changes and disturbances are described. From the simulation studies it can be concluded that the generalized predictive control algorithms offer interesting features making them suitable for real -lif e- appl i cati ons. This study presents SI SO and MI MO generalized predictive control algorithms CGPO for the trajectory control of a three link manipulator. The performance of the predictive controller was tested for several reference trajectories and under stochastic and deter mi niştik disturbances. Seperate Joint Control : The problem is to design a predictive controller for each joint so as to make the angular motion of each joint follow a desired path specified by discrete points. It is assumed that interactions between the joints are small. Thus coupling terms in the CARIMA model of the manipulator system are omitted and each joint will be controlled independently of the other. For the system, the input is the torque u; applied to the joint motor, and the output is the velocity V. of the joint. Simulations indicate that the system performs well when the seperate joint control is applied. The main advantage of a seperate Joint control is that it is simple. Moreover, the controller can be implemented using microprocessors since the number of updating system parameters is less. Predictive Controller for Interacting Joi nts CMI MO> : In this control scheme, the dynamic couplings are taken into consideration in the design of multivariable GPC controller. The task here is to determine a predictive control scheme for the manipulator joints such that the motion of the manipulator Joints follow a desired path as closely as possible for this system, the input is the torque u. applied to the Joint motor and the output is a XIII
Benzer Tezler
- 6 serbestlik dereceli robot kolun ters kinematik analizinin yapay zeka yöntemleri ile gerçekleştirilmesi
Performance of inverse kinematics analysis of 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm using artificial intelligence methods
TUĞÇE TURGUT AKSOY
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2024
Mekatronik MühendisliğiManisa Celal Bayar ÜniversitesiMakine ve İmalat Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SERKAN ÇAŞKA
ÖĞR. GÖR. HACER ARIOL TAYMAZ
- Compliance control of collaborating robots
İşbirlikçi robotların uyum kontrolü
MERTCAN KAYA
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2019
Makine Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMakine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ZEKİ YAĞIZ BAYRAKTAROĞLU
- Joint trajectory methods for a manipulator and applications for stanford manipulator
Başlık çevirisi yok
İSMAİL ÖCAL
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
1990
Elektrik ve Elektronik MühendisliğiOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiElektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. EROL KOCAOĞLAN
- Kinematic and dynamic analysis of a curved link robot
Eğri uzuvlara sahip robot kolunun kinematik ve dinamik analizi
ONUR CEM NAMLI
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2005
Makine MühendisliğiMarmara ÜniversitesiMakine Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ.DR. MEHMET ARİF ADLI
- Design and control of a mobile autonomous library robot
Mobil otonom kütüphane robotunun tasarımı ve kontrolü
ANIL AKKIZ
Yüksek Lisans
İngilizce
2019
Mekatronik Mühendisliğiİstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiMekatronik Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı
DOÇ. DR. ERDİNÇ ALTUĞ