Yüreğir ovası köylerinden kente (Adana'ya) göç olayı ve göç eden ailelerin sosyo-ekonomik yapıları
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 23123
- Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. MUSTAFA SOYSAL
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Sosyoloji, Sociology
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1992
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Çukurova Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Tarım Ekonomisi Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 61
Özet
ÖZET 42 Araştırma kapsamına Adana ili, Yüregir Ovasında bulunan îsahacılı, Kadıköy ve Dedepmarı köyleri alınmıştır. Bu köylerden 1940 yılından sonra Adana ' ya göç etmiş toplam 69 denekten anket formu kullanılarak derlenen bilgiler ışığı altında Yüregir ovası köylerinden kente (Adana'ya) göç olayı ve göç eden kişilerin sosyo-ekonomik yapısının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. ülkemizde 1950' li yıllarda belirginleşmeye başlayan kente göç olayı, araştırma alanında 194-0' lı yıllardan itibaren ortaya çıkmıştır. Araştırma alanındaki bu g
Özet (Çeviri)
45 SUMMARY Research includes city of Artana, villages of isahacılı, Kadıköy and“edepmar ' ”, that. is ; n Yüregir plato. I- is aimed to revsal and state the migration from villages in Yüregir P ' ato to city ( Adana j and the socio-eco omic structure cf the imigrating people under the spot of 4 he information.at'aered by using a qijesticnnoire given to 69 subjects whicv have i mi grated to Adana from these villages after 1940. Migration' to city which increased in l'')50's in our country, emerged in the r search field after- 1940' s. This has come up to now lr increasing in 1905' s. While the migration of the owner's c~ some big farm business was in question, in following ye s the migration of families with less fie1. ' 'has increased Th-:; subjects In tV research pointed out to these economica, reasons urn.s ; fir ding a job, establishing a job, incut fie iensy of f ?ld, jro vising their children with a - ob. In other words the repulsive power of the country j ayed an import- a ' role in the migration to city. The migration has appear--' as fami iy migration (66.7%). Most of the emigrants (91.3°&) are still in contact with their villages. The 1. enght of their visit to their own villages changes between 1 and 2 months (76.2%). But most of these visits are because of bayrams or funerals, and they are daily vis4 is. 82.6%, of the subjects stated their reasons for the leogth of theeir visits; they don't have any expectations a.:! proper-ties there. The ones who have the intention to return to their villages could. ' nt find what they expected. The type of family which is studied in the research is“the nucleus family”38.5%). The number of the total members of the studied families is 301. 164 (54.5%) of them are male, 137 (45.5%) of them are female. The46 ovarage family largeness is 4.4. The value is fie low the avarage family largeness of Turkey. In 84.1% families, number of the members is between 3 and 6. In the ages of. the members of the families, 67. 5% of population gathered between the ages of 15-64. The dependent population in the families is 48.3%. The rate of the educaated people among the families is high (92.9%). Among these people. the majority has graduated from elementary school (43.6%;. Nevertheless the rate of the people who is attebding high school or university is 23.6%. The rate of woman in the uneducated population is high (78.9%j There is no divorce among the studied families. The ages of marriage of the subjects vai_y from 15 to 39. The avarage age of marriage is 26. In the studied families, 91 people, who are in the active population, are working effectually. 90 people (98.9%) of the working population are male, 1 person (1.1%) is female. The avarage number of working people in the families is 1.3. Among the working people ; 63 people (69.2%) are shopkeepers and hand craftsmen (mechanics, electricians, barbers, tailors, etc.). Apart from these. IS people (19.8%) are farmers, 10 people (11.0%) are workers and officials. 9 people (9.9%) are in independent businesses. 9 people of working ones have more than one job. All- of them are dealing with agricultural activites in addition to their j obs. 30 families (43.5%) still have fields in the villages. The avarage large nesa of fields is about 138 da. 40.0% of the field owners are renting their.fields. Because they don't have enough tool and ianstrument in order to run their fields. The total largeness of the fields which the families dealing with agricultural businesses have is 6105 da.47 49.7% of these are land fields and 50.3% of these are garden fields. There are no fields which havp been kept resting. In the range ot ı. roriuc-ı- ion, there are watermelon 1,34.7%), wheat (32.1%) and -;orn 14.0%) Among the people \w\ g -:ai-ert to -ity, 35 perils ("0.7%; own a house in their vi'l ;. age:--;..0 poop''-; (^3.5%) own fields. The houses of 24 of the ones who own i house are sti 1 1 usable. Annual income of the 50,;:;;;, of the f ami lie: is below 20 mi 1 1 ion. high.
Benzer Tezler
- Yüreğir ovası Zağarlı köyünde yetiştirilen Kilis sığırlarının ıslahında siyah alaca boğalarından yararlanma olanakları
Başlık çevirisi yok
CENGİZ YENİÇERİ
- Yüreğir ovası Mürsel serisinde sulu pamukta toprak - bitki - su ilişkilerinin araştırılması
Başlık çevirisi yok
DURMUŞ TOĞAÇ
- Yüreğir Ovası'nda seçilen bir alanda pamuk, mısır ve soya fasulyesi ekim alanlarının landsat 5 TM sayısal uyduverileri ile belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma
Research on determination of cotton, corn and soybean planted areas at a selected part of the Yüreğir Plain by using digital satellite data of the landsat 5 TM
SEÇKİN SEFER
- Adana-Yüreğir ovası sulama sahası Yemişli köyü arazi toplulaştırması sonunda oluşacak ortalama parsel büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi
Determination of the of the average parcel greatness after land consolidation at Yemişli village at Adana_Yüreğir plain watering field
AHMET ERDOĞAN
- Adana ili Yüreğir ovasındaki değişik işletme tiplerinde verimlilik analizi
Productivity analysis of different farm types in Yüreğir plain in Adana
NACİYE TOK
