Geri Dön

The economic history of planning

Planlamanın iktisadi tarihi

  1. Tez No: 364449
  2. Yazar: DİLEK ÇETİNDAMAR
  3. Danışmanlar: Belirtilmemiş.
  4. Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
  5. Konular: Ekonomi, İşletme, Economics, Business Administration
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1992
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Ekonomi Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: Belirtilmemiş.

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The aim of the thesis was to introduce the history of planning both as an economic system and as an economic tool. An overall view was presented about different conceptualizations of planning within capitalism and socialism.Since planning has a very crucial role in socialism,main emphasis was given to the planning in socialist economies. In the capi ta) ist system, planning 1S used only in small-scale for setting targets for growth, investment, consumption and so on within a specific private or state owned company.Moreover, planning often functions as a tool for determining general near future trends in such economies. In capitalism planning is considered to be an ordinary economic tool among the others. On the other hand, it was shown that many theoreticians agreed that planning has been the backbone of the socialist economy.It functions as a means of organizing the transfer and the utilization of resources in order to achieve macroeconomic targets. Although planning is widely accepted within socialism. there are different views about the degree and the feasibility of planning and the relationship between planning and market.The discussions between the Austrian school.the Marxists and the market socialists outline these various planning models. As mentioned in the introduction. there is a strong conviction and consensus over the planning issue arguing that planning is no more an alternative economic system.The collapse of the East European Block and the Soviet Union conceived the concrete experience of planning inevitably laid the ground on which such arguments were based.To question the theoretical and historical consistency of the arguments are beyond the scope of this thesis.My main concern was to focus on different theoretical positions on the concept of planning itself.especially on the socialist theory.In addition to a short case study on the Soviet economic history in the 1917-38 period.the Soviet planning model and the indus-· trialization debate were analyzed.

Benzer Tezler

  1. Şanlıurfa ilinin turizm potansiyelinin belirlenmesi ve planlamaya yönelik öneriler

    Determination of the tourism potential of Şanlıurfa province and suggestions for planning

    MEHMET AKBIYIK

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2014

    TurizmAtatürk Üniversitesi

    Coğrafya Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. MEHMET ZAMAN

  2. Türkiye'de İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasında iktisadi politikanın dönüşümü: 1945 - 1950

    The transformation of economic policies in Turkey after the Second World War: 1945 - 1950

    PERİHAN ÜNLÜ SOYLU

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2015

    TarihAnkara Üniversitesi

    Tarih Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. RECEP BOZTEMUR

  3. Çukurova'nın iktisadi tarihi ve önemi

    History of economics and importance of the Çukurova

    HAYRİYE DOĞRUOĞLU

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2021

    EkonomiSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi

    İktisat Ana Bilim Dalı

    DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ SEZGİN ZABUN

  4. Toplumsal değişim ve dönüşüm sürecinde Adana'nın sosyo-ekonomik ve kültürel yapısı (1923-1960)

    The cultural and the socio-economic structure of Adana through the process of social change and transformation (1923-1960)

    ÖZLEM YAKTI

    Doktora

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2014

    Türk İnkılap TarihiAnkara Üniversitesi

    Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. HAKAN UZUN