Geri Dön

International regional integration: A comparative evaluation

Uluslararası bölgesel bütünleşme: Mukayeseli bir değerlendirme

  1. Tez No: 364663
  2. Yazar: ETHEM BARKAN ÖZ
  3. Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. GÜN KUT
  4. Tez Türü: Doktora
  5. Konular: Ekonomi, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Economics, International Relations
  6. Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
  7. Yıl: 1999
  8. Dil: İngilizce
  9. Üniversite: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi
  10. Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  11. Ana Bilim Dalı: Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
  12. Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
  13. Sayfa Sayısı: 517

Özet

Özet yok.

Özet (Çeviri)

The present thesis aims at analysing regionalisation which became, in the last decade, one of the most striking features of international economics and politics. Regionalisation, in its most common use refer to an economic process, mostly promoted by governments, in which barriers to trade and investment are reduced or eliminated within a given region formed by a group of countries, accompanied in certain cases, by further complimentary political arrangements and by a security dimension. Although it is possible to argue about de facto regionalisation, as it is being done for the experience in the Asia-Pacific, regionalisation remain in most cases a question of international negotiations among participating states. Regionalisation is, also perceived as an alternative or a response to the challenge caused by another fashionable issue, globalisation, and accompanying concepts of transnational ism and interdependence. As essentially being an issue of political economy, international economics provided the models for regional economic integration, to state in an ascending order from looser to deeper integration: free trade areas, customs unions, common 'markets and economic and monetary unions. These theoretical models sometimes preceeded or even induced real world experiences. However, these models did not suffice to explain the dynamics of regionalisation which, being an international phenomenon fall essentially under the competence of the international relations. In this latter field, two important theoretical traditions, liberalism and realism compete for providing a better grasp and explanation of these dynamics. Liberal institutionalist theories, focusing mainly on how international institutions foster gains from cooperation where they otherwise might not arise, culminated into neo-functionalism , which is especially constructed upon an interactive analysis of European integration. This theoretical approach, which for long time dominated the field of regional integration, is based on the transcendence of the state, through a process in which all international and transgovernmental factors take place. As its predecessor, functionalism, neo-functionalism presents a progressive and linear view of integration. The principal challenge to the liberal neo-functionalist theory came from the mainstream realist tradition. Realism, in its revised form, commonly called“neo-realism”provided for a different scheme for international cooperation and integration, based on the individual interests of the concerned states and the importance of the issue of“relative gains”for theses latter. This view contends that regional integration does not challenge the autonomy of nation states but that in contrast, state sovereignty is preserved and strengthened through regionalisation. Along with the most significant regional integration experience, that of the European Union, other regional integration schemes that exist today or that failed in the recent past, can provide a sample over which one could test the relevance of both traditions. This meeting with the realities on the ground, should also have been made by scholars belonging to both traditions that, theoretical proposals such as“revised neofunctionalism”and“liberal intergovernmental ism”aiming at establishing bridges between realist and neo-functionalist views came to the ground. The thesis concludes that though these efforts have certain relevance, inclutling for recent experience, in general terms, realist premises continue to be confirmed

Benzer Tezler

  1. Yeni yapılaşma çerçevesinde tarihi çevrenin kentsel kimliği: Beyoğlu örneğinde infill uygulamaları

    The urban identity of the historical environment within the framework of new construction: Infill applications in the case of Beyoğlu

    ESRA SARIKAYA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2022

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ENGİN EYÜP EYUBOĞLU

  2. Multiculturalism, division and planning: Lessons for urban integration and the case of Nicosia

    Çok kültürlülük, bölünme ve planlama: Kentsel bütünleşme için dersler ve Lefkoşa örneği

    GİZEM CANER

    Doktora

    İngilizce

    İngilizce

    2014

    Şehircilik ve Bölge Planlamaİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. FULİN BÖLEN

  3. Afetler politikasında dönüşüm:Türkiye'de iklim değişimine uyum yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi

    Transition in disasters policy: Evaluation of climate change adaptation approaches in Turkey

    İSMAİL KAYA

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Kamu YönetimiÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi

    Doğal Afetlerin Risk Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı

    DOÇ. DR. ALİ TOLGA ÖZDEN

  4. İstanbul tarihi Yarımada'da toptan ticaret alanlarının desantralizasyonu sürecinin ve sonuçlarının kentsel mekan bağlamında değerlendirilmesi; İSTOÇ örneği

    In the context of urban space evaluation of the decentralization process and results of wholesale trade areas in İstanbul historic peninsula; the case of İSTOÇ

    ALİ BAHADIR YELKİN

    Yüksek Lisans

    Türkçe

    Türkçe

    2019

    Mimarlıkİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Kentsel Tasarım Ana Bilim Dalı

    PROF. DR. NURAN ZEREN GÜLERSOY