İptal davası ve itiraz yolunda Anayasa Mahkemesi'nin yaptığı ilk inceleme
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 37317
- Danışmanlar: PROF.DR. CEM ERTUĞRUL
- Tez Türü: Yüksek Lisans
- Konular: Kamu Yönetimi, Siyasal Bilimler, Public Administration, Political Science
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 1994
- Dil: Türkçe
- Üniversite: Ankara Üniversitesi
- Enstitü: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 148
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
-147- VH- ÖZET (ÎNGÎLİZCE) This thesis dwells on discussions over a legal aspect of the Constitutional Court of the Turkish Republic. The Constitutional Court examines the legislative acts in two steps, namely, the preliminary or admissibility review on the one hand, and the substantital review, on the other. This study aims to examine the problems pertaining to the former review referred to above. However, this research is restricted the issues, emanating both from abstract norm control and concrete norm control. If the action for annulment is abstracted from any particular case, and if the constitutional validity of an legislative act of the parliament may be challenged directly before the Constitutional Court, this kind of appeal is called an abstract norm control. In contrast to annulment actions, described above, if a court, trying a case, finds that the law to be applied is unconstitutional, or if it is convinced of the seriousness of a claim of unconstitutionality, the court consults the Constitutional Court as to the agreement of the said to the constitution itself. In scientific literature, this kind of review is described as the concrete norm control. The“Introduction”of this study takes up, under the light of the Constitutions of 1961 and 1982, the history of constitutional jurisdiction, organisation, composition and competence of the Constitutional Court. The common problems of concrete norm control and abstract norm control in the preliminary review are examined in the“First Chapter”. The“Second Chapter”is devoted to an evaluation of the procedure of appeal and the eligibility of appealing to the Constitutional Court through implementing abstract norm control.-148- The“Third Chapter”explains the procedure of appeal to the Constitutional Court by the use of concrete norm control and also enumerates the conditions allowing a court appeal to the Constitutional Court. In the“Conclusion”, the main subjects dwelled on in the study I summarised. *fiöS&*
Benzer Tezler
- İptal ve itiraz başvuruları bakımından anayasa yargısında ilk inceleme
L'examen de la recevabilité des recours en matière de contentieux constitutionnel normatif
ÖZEN ÜLGEN ADADAĞ
- Türk Anayasa yargısında somut norm denetimi
Concrete review of norm in Turkish Constitution jurisdiction
ABDULLAH ÖMEROĞLU
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2014
Hukukİstanbul Bilgi ÜniversitesiHukuk Ana Bilim Dalı
YRD. DOÇ. DR. LAMİ BERTAN TOKUZLU
- Anayasa yargısında şekil denetimi
Constitutionality review in respect of form in constitutional adjudication
MURAT ARSLAN
- Anayasa yargısı ve Türkiye'deki uygulaması (itiraz yolu açısından)
The constitutional judgement and its implementation (in the sense of appeals)
FAHRİYE ÇİFTCİ EMİRAL