Max Weber's ideal types of patrimonialism, sultanism, and bureaucracy: An assessment of their accuracy and utility in the case of rulership relationships in the Ottoman Empire
Başlık çevirisi mevcut değil.
- Tez No: 400654
- Danışmanlar: DOÇ. DR. STEPHAN KALBERG
- Tez Türü: Doktora
- Konular: Felsefe, Sosyoloji, Philosophy, Sociology
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Belirtilmemiş.
- Yıl: 2005
- Dil: İngilizce
- Üniversite: Boston University
- Enstitü: Yurtdışı Enstitü
- Ana Bilim Dalı: Sosyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
- Bilim Dalı: Belirtilmemiş.
- Sayfa Sayısı: 178
Özet
Özet yok.
Özet (Çeviri)
This study evaluates the usefulness in respect to an empirical case of three ideal types in Max Weber's sociology of rulership (Herrschaft): patrimonialism, sultanism, and bureaucracy. Through an investigation of major features of rulership relationships in the Ottoman Empire (1299-1918), the heuristic utility of Weber's ideal types accurately to conceptualize and define a particular case is assessed. In his analysis of the Ottoman Empire, Weber emphasized that patrimonial, even sultanic, rulership relationships, in which the absolute power of sultans remained unrestrained by juridical limitations, prevailed. This study maintains that the Empire, founded on specific bureaucratic legacies of the Eastern Roman Empire, regulated ruler-ruled relationships through legal statute. The Kaniinndmes proclamations from the mid-fifteenth century were the first statutes to do so; they endowed Ottoman subjects with legal rights and an independent juridical status. In endowing JegaJ rights and juridical status to subjects, these proclamations also erected a rule-governed justice system. However, this“bureaucratization”did not carry over, as some authors have argued, fully into the Ottoman administration. Rather, the Ottoman bureaucracy retained patrimonial features; indeed it did so even in the period of Ottoman modernization (1856-1908). Loyalty to the Ottoman Palace hindered bureaucratization in this arena. Hence, bureaucratic aspects of the Ottoman Empire's juridical system stood in conflict with patrimonial features apparent in the Ottoman rulership bureaucracy. This conflict was pivotal, and defined the Ottoman Empire throughout its long history. Max Weber's three ideal types assist conceptualization of the uniqueness of rulership relationships in Ottoman history throughout the 500-year period under investigation in this dissertation. Moreover, as heuristic developmental models, they have enabied a clear isolation and definition of the particularly Ottoman ? as opposed to the Western ? historical pathway. This conclusion regarding their utility must stand despite Weber's underestimation, as demonstrated here in detail, of the influence upon the Empire of a variety of bureaucratic legacies deriving from the Eastern Roman Empire. These legacies grounded an institutional definition of the state and demarcated legal rights and independent juridical status for Ottoman subjects.
Benzer Tezler
- Dönüşümcü politik liderlik ve işlevsel otorite: Teori ve uygulama
Transformational political leadership and functional authority: Theory and practice
İLKER GÜL
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2018
Siyasal BilimlerAnadolu ÜniversitesiUluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. NEJAT DOĞAN
- Social Hierarchy and the Carnivalesque in Early Modern English Comedy: William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream, Thomas Dekker's The Shoemaker's Holiday and Ben Jonson's Bartholomew Fair
Erken modern İngiliz komedisinde sosyal hiyerarşi ve karnavalesk: William Shakespeare'in Bir Yaz Gecesi Rüyası, Thomas Dekker'ın The Shoemaker's Holiday ve Ben Jonson'un Bartholomew Fair adlı oyunları
ZAINAB ISMAT SAFA ELDEEN ALNAFTCHI
Doktora
İngilizce
2023
İngiliz Dili ve EdebiyatıAnkara ÜniversitesiBatı Dilleri ve Edebiyatları Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. SILA ŞENLEN GÜVENÇ
- Max Weber'in sosyoloji bilimine katkıları
The contributions to the sociology by Max Weber
FATMA HÜRREM SÜNNEY
Yüksek Lisans
Türkçe
2008
SosyolojiGazi ÜniversitesiOrtaöğretim Sosyal Alanlar Öğretmenliği Ana Bilim Dalı
PROF. DR. İBRAHİM ARSLANOĞLU
- Batı'da egemenlik kavramının gelişimi ve eski Türk egemenlik anlayışı
The Development of sovereignty in the west and the thought of sovereignty in ancient Turk
AYBARS PAMİR